• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Patient involvement and information preferences on hospital quality: results of an empirical analysis].

作者信息

Simon A

机构信息

Studiengang BWL-Gesundheitswirtschaft, Fakultät Wirtschaft, Duale Hochschule Baden-Württemberg, Heilbronner Strasse 7, Stuttgart, Germany.

出版信息

Unfallchirurg. 2011 Jan;114(1):73-8. doi: 10.1007/s00113-010-1882-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00113-010-1882-9
PMID:21136034
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In order to be able to make a differentiated choice between healthcare providers, people require information regarding quality. An understanding of patient needs and preferences is crucial in providing helpful information regarding hospital quality.

METHODS

This study investigated patient involvement in, and preferences for, information on hospital quality using a choice-based experiment based on best-worst scaling in a questionnaire. A total of 276 respondents participated including hospital patients and healthy persons (response rate 71%). The work was conducted in 2008.

RESULTS

The analysis showed a high involvement in information regarding hospital quality. In the measurement of information preferences (35 items/quality indicators), patients rated indicators of structure quality as the most important attributes. Information about process quality was moderately relevant from the patients' point of view. Objective results of outcome quality were more important for patients than subjective quality indicators.

CONCLUSION

Both the assessment of patient involvement in hospital quality information and the measurement of patient preferences in order to rank patient perception provide important insights into information needs of patients. The findings can subsequently be used for tailoring patient information services regarding hospital quality.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Patient involvement and information preferences on hospital quality: results of an empirical analysis].
Unfallchirurg. 2011 Jan;114(1):73-8. doi: 10.1007/s00113-010-1882-9.
2
[On the comprehensibility of German hospital quality reports: systematic evaluation and need for action].[关于德国医院质量报告的可理解性:系统评估与行动需求]
Gesundheitswesen. 2009 Jan;71(1):3-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1086010. Epub 2009 Jan 27.
3
[Patient participation in the Cochrane Collaboration: how can patients/consumers actively participate in a worldwide Cochrane Review Group?].[患者参与Cochrane协作网:患者/消费者如何积极参与全球范围内的Cochrane系统评价小组?]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2005;99(6):373-5.
4
Multiple physician recommendations for prostate cancer treatment: a Pandora's box for patients?多位医生对前列腺癌治疗的建议:对患者来说是潘多拉魔盒吗?
Can J Urol. 2010 Oct;17(5):5346-54.
5
Choosing a hospital for surgery: the importance of information on quality of care.选择手术医院:关注医疗质量信息的重要性。
Med Decis Making. 2010 Sep-Oct;30(5):544-55. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09357474. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
6
"They do what they think is the best for me." Frail elderly patients' preferences for participation in their care during hospitalization.“他们做了他们认为对我最好的事情。”虚弱的老年住院患者对参与自身照护的偏好。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Aug;80(2):233-40. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.026. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
7
Creating value-focused healthcare delivery systems: Part three--Core competencies.创建以价值为导向的医疗服务体系:第三部分——核心竞争力。
J Oncol Manag. 1997 Nov-Dec;6(6):16-23.
8
Veterans' decision-making preferences and perceived involvement in care for chronic heart failure.退伍军人对慢性心力衰竭护理的决策偏好及感知参与度
Heart Lung. 2008 Nov-Dec;37(6):440-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
9
Using the patient as messenger, novel approach delivers clinical and financial gains.以患者为信使,新方法带来临床和经济效益。
Dis Manag Advis. 2005 Aug;11(8):93-5, 85.
10
Architectural approach for quality and safety aware healthcare social networks.面向质量与安全感知型医疗社交网络的架构方法。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;180:793-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The elicitation of patient preferences for hip replacement surgery: a discrete choice experiment.髋关节置换手术患者偏好的诱导:一项离散选择实验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 18;25(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12393-6.
2
The relationship between personality traits of cancer patients and their preferences when receiving bad news.癌症患者的人格特质与其收到坏消息时的偏好之间的关系。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Mar;30(3):2299-2306. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06630-x. Epub 2021 Oct 31.
3
Hospital choice in Germany from the patient's perspective: a cross-sectional study.
从患者角度看德国的医院选择:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 13;17(1):720. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2712-3.
4
Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview.使用最佳-最差标度法对健康与医疗保健偏好的实验测量:综述
Health Econ Rev. 2016 Dec;6(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13561-015-0079-x. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
5
[Costs and benefits of quality management].质量管理的成本与效益
Urologe A. 2014 Jan;53(1):15-20. doi: 10.1007/s00120-013-3359-2.