• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发Q方法以探究员工对护理教育中技术使用的看法。

Developing Q-methodology to explore staff views toward the use of technology in nurse education.

作者信息

Petit dit Dariel Odessa, Wharrad Heather, Windle Richard

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Physiotherapy, University of Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Nurse Res. 2010;18(1):58-71. doi: 10.7748/nr2010.10.18.1.58.c8048.

DOI:10.7748/nr2010.10.18.1.58.c8048
PMID:21138086
Abstract

Technology in education is moving quickly in terms of the hardware and software applications available, but also due to the expectations of an increasingly digitally competent student population. Academics have to rethink their pedagogy in relation to these changes. Nurse educators, in particular, must face the challenge of effectively integrating technology into what is essentially a hands-on, people-centred profession. To date, the factors most commonly cited as barriers to the adoption of e-learning by academics have focused on explicit and tangible ('hard') issues. Less frequently mentioned are the implicit and tacit ('soft') factors which are harder to identify. This article describes a pilot study using Q-methodology to explore the limitations of commonly used research methods in identifying how these hard and soft issues are prioritised by individuals, through the voices of nurse educators.

摘要

教育技术在可用的硬件和软件应用方面发展迅速,同时也因为学生群体对数字技术的能力要求日益提高。学者们必须重新思考与这些变化相关的教学方法。尤其是护理教育工作者,必须面对将技术有效融入本质上是实践性、以人为主的职业中的挑战。迄今为止,被学者们最常提及的阻碍采用电子学习的因素集中在明确和有形的(“硬”)问题上。较少被提及的是那些难以识别的隐性和默会的(“软”)因素。本文描述了一项使用Q方法的试点研究,旨在通过护理教育工作者的声音,探索常用研究方法在确定个体如何对这些硬问题和软问题进行优先级排序方面的局限性。

相似文献

1
Developing Q-methodology to explore staff views toward the use of technology in nurse education.开发Q方法以探究员工对护理教育中技术使用的看法。
Nurse Res. 2010;18(1):58-71. doi: 10.7748/nr2010.10.18.1.58.c8048.
2
Q-methodology: an alternative approach to research in nurse education.Q 方法论:护理教育研究的一种替代方法。
Nurse Educ Today. 2008 Nov;28(8):917-25. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.05.010. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
3
The incidence of technological stress among baccalaureate nurse educators using technology during course preparation and delivery.在课程准备和授课过程中使用技术的护理学学士学位教育工作者中技术压力的发生率。
Nurse Educ Today. 2009 Jan;29(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.06.008. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
4
Capturing the moment. Interview by Ruth Williams.捕捉瞬间。露丝·威廉姆斯访谈。
Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2007 Sep;14(5):10-2.
5
Use of Q-methodology to identify nursing faculty viewpoints of a collaborative BScN program experience.运用Q方法确定护理教师对护理学学士合作项目经历的观点。
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2007;20(3):67-85. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2007.19290.
6
Exploring student response systems in nursing education.探索护理教育中的学生应答系统。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2008 Sep-Oct;26(5):265-70; quiz 271-2. doi: 10.1097/01.NCN.0000304840.36960.b5.
7
Overcoming challenges to collaboration: nurse educators' experiences in curriculum change.克服合作挑战:课程变革中护理教育者的经验。
J Nurs Educ. 2011 Jan;50(1):27-33. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20101029-04. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
8
Engaging millennial learners: Effectiveness of personal response system technology with nursing students in small and large classrooms.吸引千禧一代学习者:个人响应系统技术在小教室和大教室中对护理学生的有效性。
J Nurs Educ. 2010 May;49(5):272-5. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20091217-07.
9
An evaluation of the role of the clinical education facilitator.临床教育促进者角色的评估
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Feb;15(2):135-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01275.x.
10
Faculty concerns about requiring laptops in the classroom.教师对在课堂上要求使用笔记本电脑的担忧。
Nurse Educ. 2008 Jul-Aug;33(4):151-4. doi: 10.1097/01.NNE.0000312197.74191.8d.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspectives of the Elderly with Mild Cognitive Impairment Living Alone on Participating in a Dementia Prevention Program: A Q Methodology Study.独居轻度认知障碍老年人参与预防痴呆症计划的观点:一项 Q 方法学研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 22;17(21):7712. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217712.
2
New partnerships among single older adults: a Q methodology study.单身老年人之间的新伙伴关系:一种 Q 方法研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Mar 6;19(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1091-5.
3
Medical student attitudes toward kidney physiology and nephrology: a qualitative study.
医学生对肾脏生理学和肾脏病学的态度:一项定性研究。
Ren Fail. 2016 Nov;38(10):1683-1693. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2016.1230459. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
4
Exploring student preferences with a Q-sort: the development of an individualized renal physiology curriculum.运用Q分类法探索学生偏好:个性化肾脏生理学课程的开发
Adv Physiol Educ. 2015 Sep;39(3):149-57. doi: 10.1152/advan.00028.2015.