Suppr超能文献

动力加压钢板或髓内钉治疗肱骨干骨折的内固定:一项前瞻性研究。

Internal fixation of fractures of the shaft of the humerus by dynamic compression plate or intramedullary nail: A prospective study.

作者信息

Raghavendra S, Bhalodiya Haresh P

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, B. J. Medical College and Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.

出版信息

Indian J Orthop. 2007 Jul;41(3):214-8. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.33685.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The indications for surgical management of fractures of the shaft of the humerus are clear, but selecting the right implant for internal fixation of humeral fractures has been a dilemma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-six patients (mean age 40.53 years) with fractures of the shaft of the humerus were followed for 12 to 24 months in a prospective study. Eighteen patients each underwent open reduction and internal fixation with compression plating and ante grade interlock nailing. Clinical and radiographic outcome measures included fracture healing, shoulder and elbow functions, need for additional procedures and any complication such as infection and recovery of radial nerve palsy. The results were analyzed statistically using the SPSS 11.5 software, with parametric and nonparametric tests.

RESULTS

Nine of the fractures treated with compression plating and seven of those treated with interlock nailing achieved union within six months. Though there was no significant difference in union time between the treatment groups, patients operated with interlock nailing underwent more number of secondary bone grafting procedures to obtain union (six against two). There were 12 patients (66.6%) with excellent and good results in the plating group compared to four patients (25%) in the nailing group. Interlock nailing was associated with significant reduction in shoulder function (P=0.03) and in overall results (P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

Though there was no significant difference between plating or nailing in terms of time to union, compression plating is the preferred method in the majority of fractures of the shaft of the humerus with better preservation of joint function and lesser need for secondary bone grafting for union.

摘要

背景

肱骨干骨折手术治疗的适应证明确,但选择合适的内固定植入物一直是个难题。

材料与方法

在一项前瞻性研究中,对36例肱骨干骨折患者(平均年龄40.53岁)进行了12至24个月的随访。18例患者分别接受了切开复位加压钢板内固定和顺行交锁髓内钉内固定。临床和影像学结果指标包括骨折愈合情况、肩肘功能、是否需要额外手术以及任何并发症,如感染和桡神经麻痹的恢复情况。使用SPSS 11.5软件进行统计学分析,采用参数检验和非参数检验。

结果

加压钢板治疗的骨折中有9例、交锁髓内钉治疗的骨折中有7例在6个月内实现了骨愈合。虽然治疗组之间的愈合时间没有显著差异,但接受交锁髓内钉手术的患者为实现骨愈合接受二次植骨手术的次数更多(6次对2次)。钢板固定组有12例患者(66.6%)结果为优或良,而髓内钉固定组为4例患者(25%)。交锁髓内钉与肩部功能显著下降(P = 0.03)和总体结果显著下降(P = 0.02)相关。

结论

虽然钢板固定和髓内钉固定在愈合时间方面没有显著差异,但对于大多数肱骨干骨折,加压钢板是首选方法,它能更好地保留关节功能,实现骨愈合所需的二次植骨需求较少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ce3/2989121/8e0e404b9417/IJOrtho-41-214-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验