Suppr超能文献

[不同外周血干细胞冷冻保存系统的比较]

[Comparison of different cryopreservation systems for peripheral blood stem cells].

作者信息

Huang You-Zhang, Shen Jian-Liang, Yang Ping-Di, Wu Nan-Hai, Tang Xiang-Feng, Gong Li-Zhong, Cen Jian, Wang Li-Xin, Wang Ning, Zheng Pei-Hao

机构信息

Department of Hematology, Navy General Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100037, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Ying Yong Sheng Li Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Feb;24(1):125-8.

Abstract

AIM

To explore proper cryopreservative systems for hematopoietic stem cells.

METHODS

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 20 persons were mixed with different cryopreservative agent, dimethyl suflfoxide (DMSO) or combination of DMSO and hydroxyethyl starch (HES), then cooled in -80 degrees C low temperature refrigerator (Refr) or autocontrolled programmed cryogenic system (PCS), preserved in Refr or in liquid nitrogen. GM-CFU, LTC-IC, CD34+ cells and typeran blue resistance (TBR) were assayed after different period of cryopreservation.

RESULTS

The recovery rates of CFU-GM, LTC-IC, CD34+ cells and TBR in peripheral blood mononuclear cells which were cooled and preserved in Refr with 5% DMSO-6% HES were 82.2% +/- 14.7%, 83.0% +/- 12.2%, 94.2% +/- 4.3% and 97.7% +/- 3.9% respectively, significantly higher than that in Refr with 10% DMSO (P < 0.05). When cells were cryopreservated with the same cryopreservatives, there was no significantly difference of recovery rate in group of Refr and group of Refr with PCS. Meanwhile, there was not significantly difference of recovery rate among all three groups, preserved in Refr ahead of liquid nitrogen, in Refr merely, in liquid nitrogen with PCS within one year (p > 0.05). However, the recovery rate of CFU-GM, LTC- IC, CD34+ cells and TBR decreased dramatically if cells were cooled and preserved in Refr for two years. After cells were thawed, the cell activity declined gradually at room temperature if the cryopreservatives were not removed or diluted. The cell activity of 10% DMSO group was affected more than that of 5% DMSO-6% HES group.

CONCLUSION

5% DMSO-6% HES is better than 10% DMSO as cryopreservatives for hematopoietic stem cells. Refr cryopreservation is a simple and effective method if cells would be cryopreserved for less than one year. If cells would be cryopreserved for more than one year, liquid nitrogen cryopreservation should be recommended. The cryopreservatives should be diluted or removed immediately after cells were thawed.

摘要

目的

探索适用于造血干细胞的冷冻保存体系。

方法

将20名健康人的外周血单个核细胞分别与不同的冷冻保护剂,即二甲基亚砜(DMSO)或DMSO与羟乙基淀粉(HES)的组合混合,然后在-80℃低温冰箱或自控程序降温系统中进行降温,之后保存在低温冰箱或液氮中。在不同的冷冻保存时间段后,检测粒-巨噬细胞集落形成单位(GM-CFU)、长期培养起始细胞(LTC-IC)、CD34+细胞及台盼蓝拒染率(TBR)。

结果

用5%DMSO-6%HES在低温冰箱中降温保存的外周血单个核细胞,其GM-CFU、LTC-IC、CD34+细胞及TBR的回收率分别为82.2%±14.7%、83.0%±12.2%、94.2%±4.3%及97.7%±3.9%,显著高于用10%DMSO在低温冰箱中保存的细胞(P<0.05)。当用相同的冷冻保护剂时,低温冰箱组和自控程序降温系统低温冰箱组的细胞回收率无显著差异。同时,在低温冰箱中预存后再置于液氮中、仅在低温冰箱中保存、在液氮中用自控程序降温系统保存这三组,在1年内细胞回收率无显著差异(P>0.05)。然而,如果细胞在低温冰箱中保存两年,GM-CFU、LTC-IC、CD34+细胞及TBR的回收率会显著下降。细胞解冻后,如果不除去或稀释冷冻保护剂,细胞活性在室温下会逐渐下降。10%DMSO组细胞活性受影响比5%DMSO-6%HES组更大。

结论

作为造血干细胞的冷冻保护剂,5%DMSO-6%HES优于10%DMSO。如果细胞冷冻保存时间少于1年,低温冰箱冷冻保存是一种简单有效的方法。如果细胞冷冻保存时间超过1年,建议采用液氮冷冻保存。细胞解冻后应立即稀释或除去冷冻保护剂。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验