Peninsula Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Jan;29(1):1-15. doi: 10.2165/11584230-000000000-00000.
Economic evaluations of health technologies typically assume constant real drug prices and model only the cohort of patients currently eligible for treatment. It has recently been suggested that, in the UK, we should assume that real drug prices decrease at 4% per annum and, in New Zealand, that real drug prices decrease at 2% per annum and at patent expiry the drug price falls. It has also recently been suggested that we should model multiple future incident cohorts. In this article, the cost effectiveness of drugs is modelled based on these ideas. Algebraic expressions are developed to capture all costs and benefits over the entire life cycle of a new drug. The lifetime of a new drug in the UK, a key model parameter, is estimated as 33 years, based on the historical lifetime of drugs in England over the last 27 years. Under the proposed methodology, cost effectiveness is calculated for seven new drugs recently appraised in the UK. Cost effectiveness as assessed in the future is also estimated. Whilst the article is framed in mathematics, the findings and recommendations are also explained in non-mathematical language. The 'life-cycle correction factor' is introduced, which is used to convert estimates of cost effectiveness as traditionally calculated into estimates under the proposed methodology. Under the proposed methodology, all seven drugs appear far more cost effective in the UK than published. For example, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio decreases by 46%, from £61, 900 to £33, 500 per QALY, for cinacalcet versus best supportive care for end-stage renal disease, and by 45%, from £31,100 to £17,000 per QALY, for imatinib versus interferon-α for chronic myeloid leukaemia. Assuming real drug prices decrease over time, the chance that a drug is publicly funded increases over time, and is greater when modelling multiple cohorts than with a single cohort. Using the methodology (compared with traditional methodology) all drugs in the UK and New Zealand are predicted to be more cost effective. It is suggested that the willingness-to-pay threshold should be reduced in the UK and New Zealand. The ranking of cost effectiveness will change with drugs assessed as relatively more cost effective and medical devices and surgical procedures relatively less cost effective than previously thought. The methodology is very simple to implement. It is suggested that the model should be parameterized for other countries.
经济评估健康技术通常假定实际药物价格不变,并仅对当前符合治疗条件的患者队列进行建模。最近有人建议,在英国,我们应该假设实际药物价格每年下降 4%,在新西兰,实际药物价格每年下降 2%,并且在专利到期时,药物价格下降。最近也有人建议我们应该对多个未来事件队列进行建模。本文基于这些想法对药物的成本效益进行建模。开发了代数表达式来捕获新药整个生命周期内的所有成本和收益。根据过去 27 年英国药物的历史寿命,估计新药在英国的寿命为 33 年,这是模型的一个关键参数。根据提出的方法,对最近在英国进行评估的七种新药进行了成本效益分析。还估计了未来的成本效益。虽然本文以数学为框架,但也以非数学语言解释了研究结果和建议。引入了“生命周期修正因子”,用于将传统计算方法估算的成本效益转换为提出的方法下的估算。根据提出的方法,在英国,所有七种药物都比已发表的药物更具成本效益。例如,对于终末期肾病的西那卡塞与最佳支持治疗相比,增量成本效益比从传统方法的 61900 英镑/质量调整生命年降至 33500 英镑/质量调整生命年,下降了 46%;对于慢性髓性白血病的伊马替尼与干扰素-α相比,增量成本效益比从 31100 英镑/质量调整生命年降至 17000 英镑/质量调整生命年,下降了 45%。随着时间的推移,假设实际药物价格下降,药物获得公共资金的机会随着时间的推移而增加,并且在对多个队列进行建模时比单个队列更大。与传统方法相比,使用该方法,英国和新西兰的所有药物都被预测为更具成本效益。建议英国和新西兰降低支付意愿阈值。与之前相比,评估为相对更具成本效益的药物、医疗器械和手术程序的相对成本效益将发生变化。该方法非常简单,可以实施。建议为其他国家对模型进行参数化。