Department of Stroke Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan.
J Neuroimaging. 2012 Jan;22(1):80-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2010.00518.x. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
There have been some reports on right-to-left shunt as a cause of cryptogenic stroke. Although contrast transcranial Doppler (c-TCD) can detect RLS, an insufficient temporal window has occasionally restricted its applicability. Thus, we compared the rates of detecting RLS among temporal windows for the middle cerebral arteries (MCAs) and the orbital window for the internal carotid artery (ICA) on c-TCD.
We used c-TCD to detect RLS in patients with suspected ischemic stroke. We enrolled patients who had both sufficient bilateral temporal windows for MCAs and a right orbital window for ICA and performed c-TCD using all three windows simultaneously.
We enrolled 106 consecutive patients and identified microembolic signals (MES) in 30 (28%) of them. Among these 30 patients, 15 had MES from all 3 windows. When these 30 patients were defined as being positive for RLS, the rates of detection were 67%, 73%, and 80% from the right temporal, left temporal, and right orbital windows, respectively (P= .795).
The right orbital window as well as the temporal window for c-TCD could detect RLS. Insonation from the orbital window should be useful for patients who lack temporal windows.
已有一些关于右向左分流是隐源性卒中的原因的报告。尽管对比经颅多普勒(c-TCD)可以检测到 RLS,但由于时间窗口不足,其应用偶尔受到限制。因此,我们比较了 c-TCD 中检测大脑中动脉(MCA)和颈内动脉(ICA)眶窗的时间窗口之间 RLS 的检测率。
我们使用 c-TCD 检测疑似缺血性卒中患者的 RLS。我们招募了双侧 MCA 有足够颞窗且右侧 ICA 有眶窗的患者,并同时使用所有三个窗口进行 c-TCD。
我们纳入了 106 例连续患者,其中 30 例(28%)发现微栓子信号(MES)。在这 30 例患者中,有 15 例来自所有 3 个窗口的 MES。当这 30 例患者被定义为 RLS 阳性时,右颞窗、左颞窗和右眶窗的检测率分别为 67%、73%和 80%(P=.795)。
c-TCD 的眶窗和颞窗都可以检测到 RLS。对于缺乏颞窗的患者,眶窗的探查应该是有用的。