• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用灵活迭代囚徒困境来测量与社交焦虑相关的人际约束。

Measuring social anxiety related interpersonal constraint with the flexible iterated prisoner's dilemma.

机构信息

Washington University in St Louis, 1 St Louis, MO 63130, USA.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2011 Apr;25(3):427-36. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.11.006. Epub 2010 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.11.006
PMID:21145203
Abstract

Data from self-report and observational studies make it clear that problematic social anxiety confers interpersonal constraint that may contribute to the interpersonal dysfunction reported by individuals with social anxiety disorder. Direct observation of interpersonal behavior in established relationships is rare and difficult to obtain for practical reasons. We tested a flexible iterated prisoner's dilemma computer task to examine whether it might capture interpersonal constraint related to social anxiety. Our first study suggested that, at least for men, the task directly captures social anxiety's constraint on responses to friendly giving. Our second study more strongly supported the assertion that the task directly assesses interpersonal constraint. The data support a model in which social anxiety directly confers trait-like tendencies toward interpersonal constraint and indirectly constrains behavior in specific interactions. These studies provide further evidence that constrained responses to positive social behaviors are characteristic of people with problematic social anxiety and may be particularly important to dysfunctions in the close relationships of these individuals.

摘要

来自自我报告和观察性研究的数据清楚地表明,有问题的社交焦虑会导致人际约束,这可能导致社交焦虑障碍患者报告的人际功能障碍。出于实际原因,对既定关系中的人际行为进行直接观察是罕见且难以实现的。我们测试了一个灵活的迭代囚徒困境计算机任务,以检验它是否可以捕捉与社交焦虑相关的人际约束。我们的第一项研究表明,至少对于男性来说,该任务直接捕捉到社交焦虑对友好给予反应的约束。我们的第二项研究更有力地支持了这样一种观点,即该任务直接评估人际约束。这些数据支持这样一种模式,即社交焦虑直接赋予人际约束的特质倾向,并间接地限制特定互动中的行为。这些研究进一步证明,对积极社交行为的受限反应是有问题的社交焦虑人群的特征,并且可能对这些人亲密关系中的功能障碍特别重要。

相似文献

1
Measuring social anxiety related interpersonal constraint with the flexible iterated prisoner's dilemma.用灵活迭代囚徒困境来测量与社交焦虑相关的人际约束。
J Anxiety Disord. 2011 Apr;25(3):427-36. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.11.006. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
2
Interpersonal constraint conferred by generalized social anxiety disorder is evident on a behavioral economics task.广泛性社交焦虑障碍导致的人际约束在行为经济学任务中表现明显。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2013 Feb;122(1):39-44. doi: 10.1037/a0030975. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
3
Social anxiety and discomfort with friendly giving.社交焦虑与对友好给予的不适。
J Anxiety Disord. 2011 Apr;25(3):326-34. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.10.005. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
4
The behavioral economics of social anxiety disorder reveal a robust effect for interpersonal traits.社交焦虑障碍的行为经济学揭示了人际特质的强大影响。
Behav Res Ther. 2017 Aug;95:139-147. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
5
Social Skills and Social Acceptance in Children with Anxiety Disorders.焦虑障碍儿童的社交技能和社交接纳。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2015;44(5):826-38. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2014.895938. Epub 2014 May 12.
6
Virtual social interactions in social anxiety--the impact of sex, gaze, and interpersonal distance.社交焦虑中的虚拟社交互动——性别、注视和人际距离的影响。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2010 Oct;13(5):547-54. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0432. Epub 2010 Apr 3.
7
Impact of rumination versus distraction on anxiety and maladaptive self-beliefs in socially anxious individuals.反刍与分心对社交焦虑个体焦虑和不良自我信念的影响。
Behav Res Ther. 2009 Oct;47(10):861-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.06.014. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
8
Is the delay discounting paradigm useful in understanding social anxiety?延迟折扣范式在理解社交焦虑方面是否有用?
Behav Res Ther. 2007 Apr;45(4):729-35. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2006.06.007. Epub 2006 Aug 7.
9
Does social anxiety predict rumination and co-rumination among adolescents?社交焦虑是否能预测青少年的反刍和共同反刍?
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2012;41(1):86-91. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2012.632346.
10
Social anxiety as a basis for friendship selection and socialization in adolescents' social networks.社交焦虑是青少年社交网络中友谊选择和社交的基础。
J Pers. 2011 Jun;79(3):499-525. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00682.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Peer pressure: Conformity outweighs reciprocity in social anxiety.同伴压力:在社交焦虑中,从众心理超过互惠心理。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Mar 25:1-8. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03021-1.
2
Factors of influence in prisoner's dilemma task: a review of medical literature.囚徒困境任务中的影响因素:医学文献综述
PeerJ. 2022 Jan 28;10:e12829. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12829. eCollection 2022.
3
An experimental investigation of peer rejection and social anxiety on alcohol and cannabis use willingness: Accounting for social contexts and use cues in the laboratory.
同伴拒绝和社交焦虑对酒精和大麻使用意愿的实验研究:在实验室中考虑社会环境和使用线索。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2021 Dec;35(8):887-894. doi: 10.1037/adb0000711. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
4
An evolutionary perspective on paranoia.关于偏执狂的进化视角。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Feb;3(2):114-121. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0495-0. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
5
The behavioral economics of social anxiety disorder reveal a robust effect for interpersonal traits.社交焦虑障碍的行为经济学揭示了人际特质的强大影响。
Behav Res Ther. 2017 Aug;95:139-147. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
6
Clarifying the Behavioral Economics of Social Anxiety Disorder: Effects of Interpersonal Problems and Symptom Severity on Generosity.阐明社交焦虑障碍的行为经济学:人际问题和症状严重程度对慷慨程度的影响。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2016 Jan;4(1):107-121. doi: 10.1177/2167702615578128. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
7
Interpersonal constraint conferred by generalized social anxiety disorder is evident on a behavioral economics task.广泛性社交焦虑障碍导致的人际约束在行为经济学任务中表现明显。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2013 Feb;122(1):39-44. doi: 10.1037/a0030975. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
8
Testing the effects of social anxiety disorder on friendship quality across gender and ethnicity.测试社交焦虑障碍对跨性别和种族的友谊质量的影响。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2012;41(2):130-9. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2012.661451. Epub 2012 Mar 19.