Gribaudo G, Gariglio M, Cavallo G, Landolfo S
Institute of Microbiology, Medical School, University of Torino, Italy.
Eur J Immunol. 1990 Jun;20(6):1243-9. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830200608.
We have examined the mechanisms by which interferon (IFN)-gamma and IFN-alpha regulate the expression of 2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthetase (2-5A synthetase) and class I major histocompatibility complex antigens in murine T cells and in cell types of other histological origin. When treated with IFN-alpha both fibroblasts and T cell lines displayed a marked increase of the 2-5A synthetase activity and of the corresponding mRNA. The augmentation of the enzyme activity in T cells was induced by IFN-alpha at the transcriptional level, as determined by nuclear run-on analysis. In contrast IFN-gamma was capable of increasing 2-5A synthetase activity only in fibroblasts, but not in T cells. Nuclear run-on assays revealed that the 2-5A synthetase gene in T cells is not transcriptionally activated by IFN-gamma. After IFN-alpha and -gamma treatment we also observed a significant increase in class I gene expression in fibroblasts and T cell lines as measured both on the cell surface and by cytoplasmic RNA accumulation. In the case of the T cell line, DO1110, the observed increase in the steady-state levels of class I transcripts was a consequence of a high rate of H-2 gene transcription as demonstrated by run-on analysis. However, the molecular mechanisms involved in this IFN-dependent H-2 gene transcriptional activation are different between IFN-alpha and IFN-gamma. When the T cell lines DO1110, L12-R4 and EL4 were transfected with a plasmid containing a reporter gene (chloramphenicol acetyltransferase) under the control of a regulatory IFN-responsive DNA element of 237 bp or 1.4 kb, IFN-alpha was able to activate the transcription of these constructs. In contrast, IFN-gamma did not recognize the IFN-responsive element which, by itself, activated transcription of the reporter gene in response to IFN-gamma in other cellular types of non-T cell origin. Therefore, in the T cell lines examined, IFN-gamma increases the H-2 gene expression by acting on DNA elements located upstream of the regulatory segment used in this study or downstream of the cap site. This suggests a possible cell specificity in the activation of an IFN-responsive element, that in turn may regulate the IFN-inducible gene expression in a cell-specific fashion. Thus, the differential biological activities of IFN-gamma on T cells could be generated by a differential gene activation at the transcriptional level.
我们研究了干扰素(IFN)-γ和IFN-α调节小鼠T细胞及其他组织学来源细胞类型中2'-5'-寡腺苷酸合成酶(2-5A合成酶)和I类主要组织相容性复合体抗原表达的机制。用IFN-α处理时,成纤维细胞和T细胞系的2-5A合成酶活性及相应mRNA均显著增加。通过核转录分析确定,T细胞中酶活性的增强是由IFN-α在转录水平诱导的。相比之下,IFN-γ仅能增加成纤维细胞中的2-5A合成酶活性,而不能增加T细胞中的活性。核转录分析显示,T细胞中的2-5A合成酶基因不会被IFN-γ转录激活。用IFN-α和-γ处理后,我们还观察到成纤维细胞和T细胞系中I类基因表达显著增加,这通过细胞表面检测和细胞质RNA积累来衡量。对于T细胞系DO1110,观察到的I类转录本稳态水平增加是H-2基因高转录率的结果,转录分析证明了这一点。然而,IFN-α和IFN-γ在这种IFN依赖性H-2基因转录激活中涉及的分子机制不同。当T细胞系DO1110、L12-R4和EL4用含有报告基因(氯霉素乙酰转移酶)的质粒转染,该质粒受237 bp或1.4 kb的调节性IFN反应性DNA元件控制时,IFN-α能够激活这些构建体的转录。相比之下,IFN-γ不识别该IFN反应元件,而该元件本身在其他非T细胞来源的细胞类型中可响应IFN-γ激活报告基因的转录。因此,在所检测的T细胞系中,IFN-γ通过作用于本研究中使用的调节区段上游或帽位点下游的DNA元件来增加H-2基因表达。这表明在激活IFN反应元件时可能存在细胞特异性,进而可能以细胞特异性方式调节IFN诱导基因的表达。因此,IFN-γ对T细胞的不同生物学活性可能是由转录水平上的不同基因激活产生的。