Stathis Anastasios, Hotte Sebastien J, Chen Eric X, Hirte Holger W, Oza Amit M, Moretto Patricia, Webster Sheila, Laughlin Anne, Stayner Lee-Anne, McGill Shauna, Wang Lisa, Zhang Wen-Jiang, Espinoza-Delgado Igor, Holleran Julianne L, Egorin Merrill J, Siu Lillian L
Princess Margaret Hospital Phase I Consortium, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 May 20;27(15S).
This phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of the combination of decitabine with vorinostat. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors or non-Hodgkin's lymphomas were eligible. Sequential and concurrent schedules were studied. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were studied in 9 different dose levels (6 sequential and 3 concurrent). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) on the sequential schedule was decitabine 10 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-5 and vorinostat 200 mg three times a day on days 6-12. The MTD on the concurrent schedule was decitabine 10 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-5 with vorinostat 200 mg twice a day on days 3-9. However, the sequential schedule of decitabine 10 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-5 and vorinostat 200 mg twice a day on days 6-12 was more deliverable than both MTDs with fewer delays on repeated dosing and it represents the recommended phase II (RP2D) dose of this combination. Dose-limiting toxicities during the first cycle consisted of myelosuppression, constitutional and gastrointestinal symptoms and occurred in 12/42 (29%) patients evaluable for toxicity. The most common ≥ grade 3 adverse events were neutropenia (49% of patients), thrombocytopenia (16%), fatigue (16%), lymphopenia (14%), and febrile neutropenia (7%). Disease stabilization for ≥ 4 cycles was observed in 11/38 (29%) evaluable patients. CONCLUSION: The combination of decitabine with vorinostat is tolerable on both concurrent schedules in previously treated patients with advanced solid tumors or non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. The sequential schedule was easier to deliver. The combination showed activity with prolonged disease stabilization in different tumor types.
本I期研究评估了地西他滨与伏立诺他联合用药的安全性、耐受性、药代动力学及初步疗效。
入选患有晚期实体瘤或非霍奇金淋巴瘤的患者。研究了序贯给药和同步给药方案。
43例患者在9个不同剂量水平下接受研究(6个序贯剂量水平和3个同步剂量水平)。序贯给药方案的最大耐受剂量(MTD)为第1 - 5天给予地西他滨10mg/m²/天,第6 - 12天给予伏立诺他200mg,每日3次。同步给药方案的MTD为第1 - 5天给予地西他滨10mg/m²/天,第3 - 9天给予伏立诺他200mg,每日2次。然而,第1 - 5天给予地西他滨10mg/m²/天,第6 - 12天给予伏立诺他200mg,每日2次的序贯给药方案比两种MTD方案更易于实施,重复给药时延迟更少,它代表了该联合用药方案的推荐II期剂量(RP2D)。第一个周期的剂量限制性毒性包括骨髓抑制、全身症状和胃肠道症状,并发生在12/42(29%)可评估毒性的患者中。最常见的≥3级不良事件为中性粒细胞减少(49%的患者)、血小板减少(16%)、疲劳(16%)、淋巴细胞减少(14%)和发热性中性粒细胞减少(7%)。在11/38(29%)可评估患者中观察到疾病稳定≥4个周期。
对于先前接受治疗的晚期实体瘤或非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者,地西他滨与伏立诺他联合用药的两种同步给药方案均可耐受。序贯给药方案更易于实施。该联合用药方案在不同肿瘤类型中显示出具有延长疾病稳定期的活性。