Kellner Alexander W A
Setor de Paleovertebrados, Museu Nacional/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
An Acad Bras Cienc. 2010 Dec;82(4):1063-84. doi: 10.1590/s0001-37652010000400025.
Considered one of the best known flying reptiles, Pteranodon has been subject to several reviews in the last century. Found exclusively in the Upper Cretaceous Niobrara Formation and Pierre Shale Group 11 species have been attributed to this genus (excluding the ones presently regarded as representing Nyctosaurus). While reviewers agree that this number is inflated, there is disagreement on how many species can be identified. The last review recognized only two species (Pteranodon longiceps and Pteranodon sternbergi) both being sexually dimorphic. Based on several cranial features, some specimens previously referred to the genus Pteranodon are re-evaluated leading to the recognition of the following species, two of which new that are described here: Pteranodon longiceps, Geosternbergia sternbergi, Geosternbergia maiseyi sp. nov., and Dawndraco kanzai gen. et sp. nov. They differ mainly by features such as the direction and extension of the frontal crest, the angle and extension of the posterior process of the premaxillae, the shape and extension of the lower temporal fenestra and the length and proportion of the rostrum. The procedures to recognize a pterosaur species are also discussed here, and must take into account primarily morphology, in conjunction with stratigraphic and geographic data. Although well aware that changes in morphology not always reflect taxonomy, the lack of stratigraphic data and the limited number of specimens that can be confidently assigned to one species hampers our understanding on the morphological variations as a function of ontogeny, individual variation and sexual dimorphism. Although the present study has not eliminated the possibility to recognize such differences, caution is needed before models are generalized for pterosaurs.
无齿翼龙被认为是最著名的飞行爬行动物之一,在上个世纪受到了多次审视。它仅发现于上白垩统尼奥布拉拉组和皮埃尔页岩组,有11个物种被归为该属(不包括目前被认为代表夜翼龙的物种)。虽然评论家们一致认为这个数字被夸大了,但对于能够识别出多少物种存在分歧。最近一次审视只认可了两个物种(长头无齿翼龙和斯特恩伯格无齿翼龙),二者都具有两性异形特征。基于几个颅骨特征,对一些先前被归为无齿翼龙属的标本进行了重新评估,从而识别出了以下物种,其中两个是新描述的物种:长头无齿翼龙、斯特恩伯格吉奥斯翼龙、梅氏吉奥斯翼龙新种和神风盗龙新属新种。它们的主要区别在于诸如额嵴的方向和延伸、前上颌骨后突的角度和延伸、下颞孔的形状和延伸以及吻部的长度和比例等特征。这里还讨论了识别翼龙物种的程序,该程序必须主要考虑形态学,并结合地层和地理数据。尽管深知形态变化并不总是反映分类学,但地层数据的缺乏以及能够可靠地归为一个物种的标本数量有限,妨碍了我们对作为个体发育、个体变异和两性异形函数的形态变化的理解。虽然本研究并未排除识别此类差异的可能性,但在对翼龙进行模型推广之前仍需谨慎。