• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于治疗细支气管炎的支气管扩张剂。

Bronchodilators for bronchiolitis.

作者信息

Gadomski Anne M, Brower Melissa

机构信息

Research Institute, Bassett Medical Center, 1 Atwell Road, Cooperstown, New York, USA, 13326.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Dec 8(12):CD001266. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001266.pub2.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD001266.pub2
PMID:21154348
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bronchiolitis is an acute, viral lower respiratory tract infection affecting infants and often treated with bronchodilators.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of bronchodilators on clinical outcomes in infants with acute bronchiolitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 1) which contains the Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialized Register, MEDLINE (1966 to March week 2 2010) and EMBASE (2003 to March 2010).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bronchodilators (other than epinephrine) with placebo for bronchiolitis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors assessed trial quality and extracted data. Unpublished data were obtained from trial authors.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 28 trials (1912 infants) with bronchiolitis. In 10 inpatient and 10 outpatient studies, oxygen saturation did not improve with bronchodilators (mean difference (MD) -0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.96 to 0.05, n = 1182). Outpatient bronchodilator treatment did not reduce the rate of hospitalization (12% in bronchodilator group versus 16% in placebo, odds ratio (OR) 0.78, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.29, n = 650). Inpatient bronchodilator treatment did not reduce the duration of hospitalization (MD 0.06, 95% CI -0.27 to 0.39, n = 349). In seven inpatient and eight outpatient studies, average clinical score decreased slightly with bronchodilators (standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.37, 95% CI -0.62 to -0.13, n = 1006).Oximetry and clinical score outcomes showed significant heterogeneity. Including only studies at low risk of bias significantly reduced heterogeneity measures for oximetry (I(2) statistic = 17%) and average clinical score (I(2) statistic = 26%), while having little impact on the overall effect size of oximetry (MD -0.38, 95% CI -0.75 to 0.00, P = 0.05) and average clinical score (SMD -0.26, 95% CI -0.44 to -0.08, P = 0.005).Effect estimates for outpatients were slightly larger than for inpatients for oximetry (outpatients MD -0.57, 95% CI -1.13 to 0.00 versus inpatients MD -0.29, 95% CI -1.10 to 0.51) and average clinical score (outpatients SMD -0.49, 95% CI -0.86 to -0.11 versus inpatients SMD -0.20, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.03). Adverse effects included tachycardia and tremors.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Bronchodilators do not improve oxygen saturation, do not reduce hospital admission after outpatient treatment, do not shorten the duration of hospitalization and do not reduce the time to resolution of illness at home. The small improvements in clinical scores for outpatients must be weighed against the costs and adverse effects of bronchodilators.

摘要

背景

细支气管炎是一种影响婴儿的急性病毒性下呼吸道感染,通常使用支气管扩张剂进行治疗。

目的

评估支气管扩张剂对急性细支气管炎婴儿临床结局的影响。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(《Cochrane图书馆》2010年第1期),其中包含急性呼吸道感染组的专业注册库、MEDLINE(1966年至2010年3月第2周)和EMBASE(2003年至2010年3月)。

选择标准

比较支气管扩张剂(肾上腺素除外)与安慰剂治疗细支气管炎的随机对照试验(RCT)。

数据收集与分析

两位作者评估试验质量并提取数据。未发表的数据从试验作者处获得。

主要结果

我们纳入了28项关于细支气管炎的试验(1912名婴儿)。在10项住院研究和10项门诊研究中,支气管扩张剂未改善氧饱和度(平均差(MD)-0.45,95%置信区间(CI)-0.96至0.05,n = 1182)。门诊支气管扩张剂治疗未降低住院率(支气管扩张剂组为12%,安慰剂组为16%,比值比(OR)0.78,95%CI 0.47至1.29,n = 650)。住院支气管扩张剂治疗未缩短住院时间(MD 0.06,95%CI -0.27至0.39,n = 349)。在7项住院研究和8项门诊研究中,支气管扩张剂使平均临床评分略有下降(标准化平均差(SMD)-0.37,95%CI -0.62至-0.13,n = 1006)。血氧测定和临床评分结果显示出显著的异质性。仅纳入偏倚风险低的研究显著降低了血氧测定(I²统计量 = 17%)和平均临床评分(I²统计量 = 26%)的异质性指标,而对血氧测定(MD -0.38,95%CI -0.75至0.00,P = 0.05)和平均临床评分(SMD -0.26,95%CI -0.44至-0.08,P = 0.005)的总体效应大小影响不大。门诊患者的血氧测定(门诊患者MD -0.57, 95%CI -1.13至0.00,住院患者MD -0.29, 95%CI -1.10至0.51)和平均临床评分(门诊患者SMD -0.49, 95%CI -0.8

相似文献

1
Bronchodilators for bronchiolitis.用于治疗细支气管炎的支气管扩张剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Dec 8(12):CD001266. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001266.pub2.
2
Bronchodilators for bronchiolitis.用于治疗细支气管炎的支气管扩张剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19(3):CD001266. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001266.pub2.
3
Bronchodilators for bronchiolitis.用于治疗细支气管炎的支气管扩张剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 17;2014(6):CD001266. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001266.pub4.
4
Epinephrine for bronchiolitis.用于治疗细支气管炎的肾上腺素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD003123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003123.pub2.
5
Epinephrine for bronchiolitis.用于治疗细支气管炎的肾上腺素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jun 15(6):CD003123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003123.pub3.
6
Bronchodilators for the prevention and treatment of chronic lung disease in preterm infants.用于预防和治疗早产儿慢性肺病的支气管扩张剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 14;12(12):CD003214. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003214.pub3.
7
Long-acting inhaled bronchodilators for cystic fibrosis.用于囊性纤维化的长效吸入型支气管扩张剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 19;12(12):CD012102. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012102.pub2.
8
Nebulised hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants.雾化高渗盐溶液用于婴儿急性细支气管炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 21;12(12):CD006458. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006458.pub4.
9
Heliox for croup in children.氦氧混合气治疗儿童喉炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 16;8(8):CD006822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006822.pub6.
10
Short-acting inhaled bronchodilators for cystic fibrosis.短效吸入性支气管扩张剂在囊性纤维化中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 24;6(6):CD013666. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013666.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
High-flow nasal cannula therapy for infants with bronchiolitis.高流量鼻导管治疗小儿毛细支气管炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 20;3(3):CD009609. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009609.pub3.
2
Pneumococcal Meningitis Induces Hearing Loss and Cochlear Ossification Modulated by Chemokine Receptors CX3CR1 and CCR2.肺炎球菌性脑膜炎诱导趋化因子受体 CX3CR1 和 CCR2 调节的听力损失和耳蜗骨化。
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2024 Apr;25(2):179-199. doi: 10.1007/s10162-024-00935-4. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
3
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Bronchiolitis in Infancy: The Acute Hospitalization Cost.
婴儿期呼吸道合胞病毒细支气管炎:急性住院费用
Front Pediatr. 2021 Jan 18;8:594898. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.594898. eCollection 2020.
4
Multicenter Study of Albuterol Use Among Infants Hospitalized with Bronchiolitis.多中心研究沙丁胺醇在毛细支气管炎住院婴儿中的应用。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 May;19(3):475-483. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.3.35837. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
5
Intermittent versus continuous oxygen saturation monitoring for infants hospitalised with bronchiolitis: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.毛细支气管炎住院婴儿间歇性与持续性血氧饱和度监测:一项实用随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 20;8(4):e022707. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022707.
6
Reducing unnecessary chest X-rays, antibiotics and bronchodilators through implementation of the NICE bronchiolitis guideline.通过实施 NICE 毛细支气管炎指南减少不必要的胸部 X 光、抗生素和支气管扩张剂的使用。
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Jan;177(1):47-51. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-3034-5. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
7
Management of acute viral bronchiolitis in children: Evidence beyond guidelines.儿童急性病毒性细支气管炎的管理:指南之外的证据
Sudan J Paediatr. 2012;12(1):40-8.
8
Epinephrine Improves the Efficacy of Nebulized Hypertonic Saline in Moderate Bronchiolitis: A Randomised Clinical Trial.肾上腺素提高雾化高渗盐水治疗中度细支气管炎的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 17;10(11):e0142847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142847. eCollection 2015.
9
[Drug prescriptions study in the outpatient setting: assessment of off-label uses in children].[门诊环境下的药物处方研究:儿童超说明书用药评估]
Aten Primaria. 2015 Jun-Jul;47(6):344-50. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
10
Inter-society consensus document on treatment and prevention of bronchiolitis in newborns and infants.《新生儿和婴儿毛细支气管炎治疗和预防的国际共识文件》。
Ital J Pediatr. 2014 Oct 24;40:65. doi: 10.1186/1824-7288-40-65.