Gadomski Anne M, Brower Melissa
Research Institute, Bassett Medical Center, 1 Atwell Road, Cooperstown, New York, USA, 13326.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Dec 8(12):CD001266. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001266.pub2.
Bronchiolitis is an acute, viral lower respiratory tract infection affecting infants and often treated with bronchodilators.
To assess the effects of bronchodilators on clinical outcomes in infants with acute bronchiolitis.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 1) which contains the Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialized Register, MEDLINE (1966 to March week 2 2010) and EMBASE (2003 to March 2010).
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bronchodilators (other than epinephrine) with placebo for bronchiolitis.
Two authors assessed trial quality and extracted data. Unpublished data were obtained from trial authors.
We included 28 trials (1912 infants) with bronchiolitis. In 10 inpatient and 10 outpatient studies, oxygen saturation did not improve with bronchodilators (mean difference (MD) -0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.96 to 0.05, n = 1182). Outpatient bronchodilator treatment did not reduce the rate of hospitalization (12% in bronchodilator group versus 16% in placebo, odds ratio (OR) 0.78, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.29, n = 650). Inpatient bronchodilator treatment did not reduce the duration of hospitalization (MD 0.06, 95% CI -0.27 to 0.39, n = 349). In seven inpatient and eight outpatient studies, average clinical score decreased slightly with bronchodilators (standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.37, 95% CI -0.62 to -0.13, n = 1006).Oximetry and clinical score outcomes showed significant heterogeneity. Including only studies at low risk of bias significantly reduced heterogeneity measures for oximetry (I(2) statistic = 17%) and average clinical score (I(2) statistic = 26%), while having little impact on the overall effect size of oximetry (MD -0.38, 95% CI -0.75 to 0.00, P = 0.05) and average clinical score (SMD -0.26, 95% CI -0.44 to -0.08, P = 0.005).Effect estimates for outpatients were slightly larger than for inpatients for oximetry (outpatients MD -0.57, 95% CI -1.13 to 0.00 versus inpatients MD -0.29, 95% CI -1.10 to 0.51) and average clinical score (outpatients SMD -0.49, 95% CI -0.86 to -0.11 versus inpatients SMD -0.20, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.03). Adverse effects included tachycardia and tremors.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Bronchodilators do not improve oxygen saturation, do not reduce hospital admission after outpatient treatment, do not shorten the duration of hospitalization and do not reduce the time to resolution of illness at home. The small improvements in clinical scores for outpatients must be weighed against the costs and adverse effects of bronchodilators.
细支气管炎是一种影响婴儿的急性病毒性下呼吸道感染,通常使用支气管扩张剂进行治疗。
评估支气管扩张剂对急性细支气管炎婴儿临床结局的影响。
我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(《Cochrane图书馆》2010年第1期),其中包含急性呼吸道感染组的专业注册库、MEDLINE(1966年至2010年3月第2周)和EMBASE(2003年至2010年3月)。
比较支气管扩张剂(肾上腺素除外)与安慰剂治疗细支气管炎的随机对照试验(RCT)。
两位作者评估试验质量并提取数据。未发表的数据从试验作者处获得。
我们纳入了28项关于细支气管炎的试验(1912名婴儿)。在10项住院研究和10项门诊研究中,支气管扩张剂未改善氧饱和度(平均差(MD)-0.45,95%置信区间(CI)-0.96至0.05,n = 1182)。门诊支气管扩张剂治疗未降低住院率(支气管扩张剂组为12%,安慰剂组为16%,比值比(OR)0.78,95%CI 0.47至1.29,n = 650)。住院支气管扩张剂治疗未缩短住院时间(MD 0.06,95%CI -0.27至0.39,n = 349)。在7项住院研究和8项门诊研究中,支气管扩张剂使平均临床评分略有下降(标准化平均差(SMD)-0.37,95%CI -0.62至-0.13,n = 1006)。血氧测定和临床评分结果显示出显著的异质性。仅纳入偏倚风险低的研究显著降低了血氧测定(I²统计量 = 17%)和平均临床评分(I²统计量 = 26%)的异质性指标,而对血氧测定(MD -0.38,95%CI -0.75至0.00,P = 0.05)和平均临床评分(SMD -0.26,95%CI -0.44至-0.08,P = 0.005)的总体效应大小影响不大。门诊患者的血氧测定(门诊患者MD -0.57, 95%CI -1.13至0.00,住院患者MD -0.29, 95%CI -1.10至0.51)和平均临床评分(门诊患者SMD -0.49, 95%CI -0.8