Suppr超能文献

癫痫发作频率估计在时间、方法和观察者之间的一致性。

Consistency of seizure frequency estimates across time, methods, and observers.

作者信息

Glueckauf R L, Girvin J P, Braun J R, Bochen J L

机构信息

Purdue School of Science, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN 46205-2810.

出版信息

Health Psychol. 1990;9(4):427-34. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.9.4.427.

Abstract

Assessed the consistency of seizure frequency reports across observers, time, and methods. Thirty-two persons with intractable, partial seizures and 17 observers participated in a two-phase assessment procedure. During the first phase, subjects and observers provided retrospective seizure frequency estimates for two consecutive 30-day intervals. During the second phase, subjects and observers completed a daily seizure diary for 30 days. Patients' and observers' retrospective estimates were highly stable over a 2-month period. Substantial consistency was also found between two different recording methods (recall vs. diary) for subjects with epilepsy. In contrast, the observers' retrospective estimates were only moderately correlated with their prospective diary counts. Agreement between subjects' and observers' retrospective reports was also high. However, no significant association was found between their diary counts. Contrary to expectation, seizure frequency reports of patients with partial epilepsy showed moderately high consistency across time and between patient and observer pairs.

摘要

评估了不同观察者、不同时间以及不同方法下癫痫发作频率报告的一致性。32名患有难治性部分性癫痫的患者和17名观察者参与了一个两阶段评估程序。在第一阶段,受试者和观察者对两个连续的30天间隔提供回顾性癫痫发作频率估计。在第二阶段,受试者和观察者完成了为期30天的每日癫痫发作日记。患者和观察者的回顾性估计在2个月期间高度稳定。对于癫痫患者,两种不同记录方法(回忆法与日记法)之间也发现了高度一致性。相比之下,观察者的回顾性估计与他们前瞻性日记记录数之间仅呈中度相关。受试者和观察者回顾性报告之间的一致性也很高。然而,他们的日记记录数之间未发现显著关联。与预期相反,部分性癫痫患者的癫痫发作频率报告在不同时间以及患者与观察者之间显示出中度高度一致性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验