• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较适形和调强放射治疗技术治疗盆腔肿瘤。急性毒性分析。

Comparison of conformal and intensity modulated radiation therapy techniques for treatment of pelvic tumors. Analysis of acute toxicity.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Av, Albert Einstein, 627, São Paulo-SP-05651-901-Brazil.

出版信息

Radiat Oncol. 2010 Dec 14;5:117. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-117.

DOI:10.1186/1748-717X-5-117
PMID:21156076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3009969/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This retrospective analysis reports on the comparative outcome of acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities between conformal radiation therapy (CRT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques in the treatment of patients with pelvic tumors.

METHODS

From January 2002 to December 2008, 69 patients with pelvic tumors underwent whole pelvic CRT and 65 underwent whole pelvic IMRT to treat pelvic lymph nodes and primary tumor regions. Total dose to the whole pelvis ranged from 50 to 50.4 Gy in 25 to 28 daily fractions. Chemotherapy (CT) regimen, when employed, was based upon primary tumor. Acute GI and GU toxicities were graded by RTOG/EORTC acute radiation morbidity criteria.

RESULTS

Absence of GI symptoms during radiotherapy (grade 0) was more frequently observed in the IMRT group (43.1% versus 8.7; p < 0.001) and medication for diarrhea (Grade 2) was more frequently used in the CRT group (65.2% versus 38.5%; p = 0.002). Acute GI grade 1 and 3 side effects incidence was similar in both groups (18.5% versus 18.8%; p = 0.95 and 0% versus 7.2%; p = 0.058, respectively). Incidence of GU toxicity was similar in both groups (grade 0: 61.5% versus 66.6%, p = 0.54; grade 1: 20% versus 8.7%, p = 0.06; grade 2: 18.5% versus 23.5%, p = 0.50 and grade 3: 0% versus 1.5%, p > 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

This comparative case series shows less grade 2 acute GI toxicity in patients treated with whole pelvic IMRT in comparison with those treated with CRT. Incidence of acute GU toxicity was similar in both groups.

摘要

背景

本回顾性分析报告比较了盆腔肿瘤患者接受适形放疗(CRT)和调强放疗(IMRT)技术治疗时急性胃肠道(GI)和泌尿生殖系统(GU)毒性的结果。

方法

2002 年 1 月至 2008 年 12 月,69 例盆腔肿瘤患者接受全盆腔 CRT,65 例接受全盆腔 IMRT,以治疗盆腔淋巴结和原发肿瘤区域。全盆腔总剂量为 50 至 50.4Gy,分 25 至 28 次每日分割。化疗(CT)方案根据原发肿瘤而定。急性 GI 和 GU 毒性采用 RTOG/EORTC 急性放射损伤标准分级。

结果

IMRT 组中(43.1%比 8.7%;p < 0.001)放疗期间胃肠道症状(0 级)的发生率更高,而 CRT 组中腹泻药物治疗(2 级)的使用率更高(65.2%比 38.5%;p = 0.002)。两组急性 GI 1 级和 3 级副作用发生率相似(18.5%比 18.8%;p = 0.95 和 0%比 7.2%;p = 0.058)。两组 GU 毒性发生率相似(0 级:61.5%比 66.6%,p = 0.54;1 级:20%比 8.7%,p = 0.06;2 级:18.5%比 23.5%,p = 0.50;3 级:0%比 1.5%,p > 0.99)。

结论

本病例系列比较研究表明,接受全盆腔 IMRT 治疗的患者急性 2 级 GI 毒性低于接受 CRT 治疗的患者。两组急性 GU 毒性发生率相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6e/3009969/ce34ecb5ee8f/1748-717X-5-117-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6e/3009969/ce34ecb5ee8f/1748-717X-5-117-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6e/3009969/ce34ecb5ee8f/1748-717X-5-117-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of conformal and intensity modulated radiation therapy techniques for treatment of pelvic tumors. Analysis of acute toxicity.比较适形和调强放射治疗技术治疗盆腔肿瘤。急性毒性分析。
Radiat Oncol. 2010 Dec 14;5:117. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-117.
2
Whole pelvic radiotherapy for prostate cancer using 3D conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy.使用三维适形放疗和调强放疗对前列腺癌进行全盆腔放疗。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Nov 1;63(3):765-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.02.050.
3
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy reduces toxicity with similar biochemical control compared with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A randomized clinical trial.调强放射治疗与三维适形放射治疗相比,在前列腺癌的生化控制效果相似的情况下,可降低毒性:一项随机临床试验。
Cancer. 2016 Jul 1;122(13):2004-11. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29983. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
4
Low Toxicity in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Treated With Abdominal and Pelvic Radiation Therapy.腹部和盆腔放射治疗的炎症性肠病患者的低毒性
Am J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec;38(6):564-9. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000010.
5
Reduced acute bowel toxicity in patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for rectal cancer.调强放疗治疗直肠癌患者的急性肠道毒性降低。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Apr 1;82(5):1981-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.051. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
6
Improved toxicity profile following high-dose postprostatectomy salvage radiation therapy with intensity-modulated radiation therapy.高强度聚焦超声治疗子宫肌瘤的疗效及安全性:一项多中心、随机对照临床试验
Eur Urol. 2011 Dec;60(6):1142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.08.006. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
7
Incidence of late rectal and urinary toxicities after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌三维适形放疗和调强放疗后晚期直肠和泌尿系统毒性反应的发生率
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Mar 15;70(4):1124-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.11.044.
8
National Population-Based Study Comparing Treatment-Related Toxicity in Men Who Received Intensity Modulated Versus 3-Dimensional Conformal Radical Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer.一项基于全国人口的研究,比较接受调强放疗与三维适形根治性放疗的前列腺癌男性患者的治疗相关毒性。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Dec 1;99(5):1253-1260. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.07.040. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
9
[A randomized study of intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus three dimensional conformal radiation therapy for pelvic radiation in patients of post-operative treatment with gynecologic malignant tumor].[调强放射治疗与三维适形放射治疗用于妇科恶性肿瘤术后盆腔放疗的随机研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Mar 25;52(3):168-174. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.03.006.
10
Late Side Effects After Image Guided Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Compared to 3D-Conformal Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results From 2 Prospective Cohorts.与三维适形放射治疗相比,影像引导调强放射治疗后前列腺癌的晚期副作用:两项前瞻性队列研究结果
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Jun 1;95(2):680-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.01.031. Epub 2016 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With Nedaplatin Versus Cisplatin in Patients With Stage IIB-IVA Cervical Cancer: A Randomized Phase III Trial.奈达铂与顺铂同步放化疗治疗IIB-IVA期宫颈癌患者的随机III期试验
Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 2;11:798617. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.798617. eCollection 2021.
2
Rectal Dose Is the Other Dosimetric Factor in Addition to Small Bowel for Prediction of Acute Diarrhea during Postoperative Whole-Pelvic Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in Gynecologic Patients.在妇科患者术后全盆腔调强放疗期间,直肠剂量是除小肠之外用于预测急性腹泻的另一个剂量学因素。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jan 28;13(3):497. doi: 10.3390/cancers13030497.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Preoperative helical tomotherapy and megavoltage computed tomography for rectal cancer: impact on the irradiated volume of small bowel.术前螺旋断层放疗和兆伏级计算机断层扫描用于直肠癌:对小肠照射体积的影响
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Aug 1;74(5):1476-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.017. Epub 2009 Feb 21.
2
The normal tissue sparing obtained with simultaneous treatment of pelvic lymph nodes and bladder using intensity-modulated radiotherapy.使用调强放疗同时治疗盆腔淋巴结和膀胱时所获得的正常组织保护。
Acta Oncol. 2009;48(2):238-44. doi: 10.1080/02841860802251575.
3
Dosimetric comparison of bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional techniques for treatment of cervical cancer.
Treatment Outcome of the Combination Therapy of High-dose rate Intracavitary Brachytherapy and Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy With Central-shielding for Cervical Cancer.
高剂量率腔内近距离放疗联合中央屏蔽调强放疗治疗宫颈癌的疗效观察。
In Vivo. 2020 Nov-Dec;34(6):3387-3398. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12177.
4
Optimal dose limitation strategy for bone marrow sparing in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of cervical cancer.宫颈癌调强放疗中骨髓保护的最佳剂量限制策略。
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Aug 5;14(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1324-y.
5
Does initial 45Gy of pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy reduce late complications in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer? A cohort control study using definitive chemoradiotherapy with high-dose rate brachytherapy.初始 45Gy 盆腔调强放疗是否降低局部晚期宫颈癌患者的晚期并发症?采用高剂量率近距离放疗的根治性放化疗的队列对照研究。
Radiol Oncol. 2013 May 21;47(2):176-84. doi: 10.2478/raon-2013-0011. Print 2013 Jun.
6
Pelvic Ewing sarcomas. Three-dimensional conformal vs. intensity-modulated radiotherapy.骨盆尤文肉瘤。三维适形与调强放疗比较。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2013 Apr;189(4):308-14. doi: 10.1007/s00066-012-0304-z. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
骨髓保护调强放疗与传统技术治疗宫颈癌的剂量学比较
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Aug 1;71(5):1504-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.046.
4
Preoperative capecitabine and accelerated intensity-modulated radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a phase II trial.术前卡培他滨与加速调强放疗用于局部晚期直肠癌:一项II期试验
Am J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jun;31(3):264-70. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318161dbd3.
5
Evidence behind use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a systematic review of comparative clinical studies.调强放射治疗应用的证据:比较临床研究的系统评价
Lancet Oncol. 2008 Apr;9(4):367-75. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70098-6.
6
Acute toxicity of postoperative IMRT and chemotherapy for endometrial cancer.子宫内膜癌术后调强放射治疗与化疗的急性毒性
Radiat Med. 2007 Nov;25(9):439-45. doi: 10.1007/s11604-007-0163-1. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
7
Optimal organ-sparing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) regimen for the treatment of locally advanced anal canal carcinoma: a comparison of conventional and IMRT plans.用于治疗局部晚期肛管癌的最佳保留器官调强放射治疗(IMRT)方案:传统方案与IMRT方案的比较
Radiat Oncol. 2007 Nov 15;2:41. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-2-41.
8
Clinical outcome in posthysterectomy cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent Cisplatin and intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy: comparison with conventional radiotherapy.顺铂同步联合调强适形盆腔放疗治疗子宫切除术后宫颈癌患者的临床疗效:与传统放疗的比较
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Apr 1;67(5):1438-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.11.005.
9
Potential advantages of intensity-modulated radiation therapy in gynecologic malignancies.调强放射治疗在妇科恶性肿瘤中的潜在优势。
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2006 Jul;16(3):144-51. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2006.05.001.
10
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for gynecologic cancers: pitfalls, hazards, and cautions to be considered.妇科癌症的调强放射治疗:需要考虑的陷阱、风险及注意事项。
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2006 Jul;16(3):138-43. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2006.02.002.