Clinical Neurological Sciences and Psychological Services, London Health Sciences Centre, Ontario.
Can J Neurol Sci. 2011 Jan;38(1):88-97.
In order to characterize the nature and extent of neuropsychological dysfunction in primary lateral sclerosis (PLS), we studied prospectively cognitive, emotional, and behavioral functioning in PLS, and compared performances to functioning in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
Eighteen patients with PLS and 13 patients with ALS completed a neuropsychological test battery assessing both cognitive skills and emotional/behavioral functioning.
Both PLS and ALS groups scored broadly within normal limits (mean T-scores greater than 40) on all cognitive measures and no significant between-group differences were found with the exception of one variable. However, when examined on a case by case basis, the data revealed considerable heterogeneity amongst patients in both groups. Overall, 39% of PLS patients and 31% of ALS patients were considered cognitively impaired. Ahigher than expected frequency of abnormal scores was noted for several tests of executive function in both groups, and a majority of PLS patients also exhibited abnormal behavioural symptoms. There was no relationship in PLS or ALS groups between cognitive functioning and disease duration, current site of disease, site of onset, functional status, and respiratory variables. Comparison between the PLS and ALS groups indicated virtually no differences in cognitive test scores and overall emotional/behavioural symptoms.
We observed deficits in cognition and behaviour in a significant proportion of PLS patients which were comparable to those observed in ALS cases. Although deficits were not in the range of frontotemporal dementia, both ALS and PLS cases demonstrated deficits most prominently on tests of executive functioning.
为了描述原发性侧索硬化症(PLS)患者神经心理学功能障碍的性质和程度,我们前瞻性地研究了 PLS 患者的认知、情感和行为功能,并将其与肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者的功能进行了比较。
18 名 PLS 患者和 13 名 ALS 患者完成了一项神经心理学测试,评估认知技能和情感/行为功能。
PLS 和 ALS 组在所有认知测试中均广泛得分正常范围(平均 T 分数大于 40),除了一个变量外,两组之间没有显著差异。然而,通过逐个病例检查,发现两组患者的数据存在相当大的异质性。总的来说,39%的 PLS 患者和 31%的 ALS 患者被认为存在认知障碍。两组患者的多项执行功能测试均出现高于预期的异常评分频率,大多数 PLS 患者也表现出异常行为症状。在 PLS 或 ALS 组中,认知功能与疾病持续时间、当前疾病部位、发病部位、功能状态和呼吸变量之间均无相关性。PLS 组和 ALS 组之间的认知测试评分和总体情绪/行为症状几乎没有差异。
我们观察到相当一部分 PLS 患者存在认知和行为缺陷,与 ALS 患者观察到的缺陷相当。尽管缺陷不在额颞叶痴呆的范围内,但 ALS 和 PLS 病例在执行功能测试上的缺陷最为明显。