• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

规范信念认为,攻击性是自恋剥削和网络欺凌的中介。

Normative beliefs about aggression as a mediator of narcissistic exploitativeness and cyberbullying.

机构信息

Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2011 Sep;26(13):2619-34. doi: 10.1177/0886260510388286. Epub 2010 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1177/0886260510388286
PMID:21156699
Abstract

The current study examined normative beliefs about aggression as a mediator between narcissistic exploitativeness and cyberbullying using two Asian adolescent samples from Singapore and Malaysia. Narcissistic exploitativeness was significantly and positively associated with cyberbullying and normative beliefs about aggression and normative beliefs about aggression were significantly and positively associated with cyberbullying. Normative beliefs about aggression were a significant partial mediator in both samples; these beliefs about aggression served as one possible mechanism of action by which narcissistic exploitativeness could exert its influence on cyberbullying. Findings extended previous empirical research by showing that such beliefs can be the mechanism of action not only in offline but also in online contexts and across cultures. Cyberbullying prevention and intervention efforts should include modification of norms and beliefs supportive of the legitimacy and acceptability of cyberbullying.

摘要

本研究使用来自新加坡和马来西亚的两个亚洲青少年样本,考察了攻击性的规范信念在自恋剥削与网络欺凌之间的中介作用。自恋剥削与网络欺凌和攻击性的规范信念显著正相关,而攻击性的规范信念与网络欺凌显著正相关。在两个样本中,攻击性的规范信念都是一个显著的部分中介变量;这些关于攻击性的信念是自恋剥削对网络欺凌产生影响的一个可能的作用机制。研究结果扩展了以往的实证研究,表明这些信念不仅可以在线下,也可以在线上以及跨文化环境中成为作用机制。网络欺凌的预防和干预工作应包括修改规范和信念,以减少对网络欺凌的合法性和可接受性的支持。

相似文献

1
Normative beliefs about aggression as a mediator of narcissistic exploitativeness and cyberbullying.规范信念认为,攻击性是自恋剥削和网络欺凌的中介。
J Interpers Violence. 2011 Sep;26(13):2619-34. doi: 10.1177/0886260510388286. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
2
Bystanders' responses to offline bullying and cyberbullying: The role of empathy and normative beliefs about aggression.旁观者对线下欺凌和网络欺凌的反应:同理心和关于攻击行为的规范信念的作用。
Scand J Psychol. 2016 Apr;57(2):169-76. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12277.
3
Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils.网络欺凌:其本质及对中学生的影响。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;49(4):376-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x.
4
Cyberbullying: another main type of bullying?网络欺凌:另一种主要的欺凌类型?
Scand J Psychol. 2008 Apr;49(2):147-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00611.x.
5
Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide.欺凌、网络欺凌与自杀。
Arch Suicide Res. 2010;14(3):206-21. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2010.494133.
6
Cornered: an approach to school bullying and cyberbullying, and forensic implications.被逼入绝境:一种处理校园欺凌和网络欺凌的方法,以及法医学上的影响。
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2011 Jul;20(3):447-65. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2011.03.004.
7
Gender bias in the measurement of peer victimization: an application of item response theory.同伴侵害测量中的性别偏见:项目反应理论的应用。
Aggress Behav. 2013 Sep-Oct;39(5):370-80. doi: 10.1002/ab.21486. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
8
Cyberbullying and adolescent mental health.网络欺凌与青少年心理健康。
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2012;24(1):27-35. doi: 10.1515/ijamh.2012.005. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
9
Cyberbullying and self-esteem.网络欺凌与自尊。
J Sch Health. 2010 Dec;80(12):614-21; quiz 622-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2010.00548.x.
10
Relationship between boys' normative beliefs about aggression and their physical, verbal, and indirect aggressive behaviors.男孩关于攻击行为的规范信念与其身体攻击、言语攻击和间接攻击行为之间的关系。
Adolescence. 2009 Autumn;44(175):635-50.

引用本文的文献

1
Cyberbullying and its protective and risk factors among Polish adolescents.波兰青少年中的网络欺凌及其保护因素和风险因素。
Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2022 Jan 24;10(3):190-204. doi: 10.5114/cipp.2021.111404. eCollection 2022.
2
The relationship between the Dark Triad and bullying among Chinese adolescents: the role of social exclusion and sense of control.黑暗人格三合一与中国青少年欺凌行为之间的关系:社会排斥和控制感的作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 10;14:1173860. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1173860. eCollection 2023.
3
Cyberbullying as a Learned Behavior: Theoretical and Applied Implications.
网络欺凌作为一种习得行为:理论与应用启示
Children (Basel). 2023 Feb 8;10(2):325. doi: 10.3390/children10020325.
4
How beliefs and unpleasant emotions direct cyberbullying intentions.信念和不良情绪如何引导网络欺凌意图。
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 8;8(12):e12163. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12163. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Bullying-Related Tweets: a Qualitative Examination of Perpetrators, Targets, and Helpers.与欺凌相关的推文:对欺凌者、受欺凌者及帮助者的定性研究
Int J Bullying Prev. 2022;4(1):6-22. doi: 10.1007/s42380-021-00098-3. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
6
Dark personality traits and cyber aggression in adolescents: A moderated mediation analysis of belief in virtuous humanity and self-control.青少年的黑暗人格特质与网络攻击行为:对善良人性信念和自我控制的调节中介分析
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020 Dec;119:105565. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105565. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
7
Socioeconomic Effects in Cyberbullying: Global Research Trends in the Educational Context.网络欺凌的社会经济影响:教育背景下的全球研究趋势。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 18;17(12):4369. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124369.
8
Normative beliefs about cyberbullying: comparisons of Israeli and U.S. youth.关于网络欺凌的规范性信念:以色列和美国青少年的比较。
Heliyon. 2019 Dec 18;5(12):e03048. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03048. eCollection 2019 Dec.
9
The Relationship Between the Dark Triad and Internet Adaptation Among Adolescents in China: Internet Use Preference as a Mediator.中国青少年黑暗三性格与网络适应的关系:以网络使用偏好为中介变量
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 30;10:2023. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02023. eCollection 2019.
10
Cyberbullying and emotional distress in adolescents: the importance of family, peers and school.青少年中的网络欺凌与情绪困扰:家庭、同伴和学校的重要性
Heliyon. 2019 Jun 28;5(6):e01992. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01992. eCollection 2019 Jun.