Suppr超能文献

对比研究:牙本质粘结系统的粘结强度与微渗漏

Comparative study: bond strength and microleakage with dentin bond systems.

作者信息

Tsai Y H, Swartz M L, Phillips R W, Moore B K

出版信息

Oper Dent. 1990 Mar-Apr;15(2):53-60.

PMID:2115676
Abstract

Four commercial bond agent-composite systems were tested with respect to the strength of the bond to bovine dentin and their ability to seal class 5 erosion lesions without cavity preparation. At seven days there was no significant difference in the bond strengths of the four bonding agents, Scotchbond, Gluma, Tenure, and Scotchbond 2. Restorations placed with Gluma had significantly less leakage than those placed with other bond agents. At 90 days the bond strength of Tenure was reduced and was significantly less than that of the other systems, while Gluma and Scotchbond 2 restorations exhibited significantly less leakage than Scotchbond and Tenure. There was an inverse correlation (r2 = .5460) between bond strength and marginal leakage of class 5 restorations.

摘要

针对四种商用粘结剂 - 复合材料系统,测试了它们与牛牙本质的粘结强度以及在不制备洞型的情况下封闭5类侵蚀性病变的能力。七天时,四种粘结剂Scotchbond、Gluma、Tenure和Scotchbond 2的粘结强度没有显著差异。使用Gluma进行的修复体渗漏明显少于使用其他粘结剂的修复体。90天时,Tenure的粘结强度降低,且显著低于其他系统,而Gluma和Scotchbond 2修复体的渗漏明显少于Scotchbond和Tenure。5类修复体的粘结强度与边缘渗漏之间存在负相关(r2 = 0.5460)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验