University of Kent, Keynes College, Canterbury CT27NP, UK.
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;22(1):49-53. doi: 10.1177/0956797610392925. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
Scholars have proposed a conceptual structure for the self-critical moral emotions of guilt and shame and the other-critical emotions of anger and disgust. In this model, guilt is linked with anger and shame with disgust. This relationship may express itself in asymmetrical social cuing between emotions: In a social context, other people's angry facial expressions may communicate that the target should feel guilty, and other people's disgusted facial expressions may communicate that the target should feel ashamed. We conducted two experiments, one in the United Kingdom and the other in Spain, in which participants were shown pictures of faces expressing either anger or disgust. Participants rated the degree to which the faces would make them feel guilt or shame in a casual social encounter, and they answered questions about inferences concerning the emotional expressions. In both studies, angry expressions led to greater guilt and less shame than did disgusted expressions. This relationship was explained better by the type of norm violation inferred than by whether the violation was thought to involve the target's action or personality versus the target's character.
学者们提出了一个关于自我批评的道德情感(内疚和羞耻)和他人批评的情感(愤怒和厌恶)的概念结构。在这个模型中,内疚与愤怒有关,羞耻与厌恶有关。这种关系可能表现在情感之间的非对称社会提示中:在社会背景下,他人愤怒的面部表情可能传达出目标应该感到内疚,而他人厌恶的面部表情可能传达出目标应该感到羞耻。我们进行了两项实验,一项在英国,另一项在西班牙,参与者观看了表达愤怒或厌恶的面孔的图片。参与者评价了在随意的社交场合中这些面孔会让他们感到内疚或羞耻的程度,并回答了关于情感表达推断的问题。在两项研究中,愤怒的表情比厌恶的表情更能引起内疚感,而引起的羞耻感则较少。这种关系可以通过推断出的违规类型来更好地解释,而不是通过违规是被认为涉及目标的行为或个性还是目标的性格来解释。