• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在医学重症监护病房中使用全患者精细化诊断相关组(APR-DRG)死亡风险评分作为严重程度调整指标。

Use of the All Patient Refined-Diagnosis Related Group (APR-DRG) Risk of Mortality Score as a Severity Adjustor in the Medical ICU.

作者信息

Baram Daniel, Daroowalla Feroza, Garcia Ruel, Zhang Guangxiang, Chen John J, Healy Erin, Riaz Syed Ali, Richman Paul

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine.

出版信息

Clin Med Circ Respirat Pulm Med. 2008 Apr 18;2:19-25. doi: 10.4137/ccrpm.s544.

DOI:10.4137/ccrpm.s544
PMID:21157518
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2990229/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of APR-DRG (All Patient Refined-Diagnosis Related Group) Risk of Mortality (ROM) score as a mortality risk adjustor in the intensive care unit (ICU).

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of hospital mortality.

SETTING

Medical ICU in a university hospital located in metropolitan New York.

PATIENTS

1213 patients admitted between February 2004 and March 2006.

MAIN RESULTS

Mortality rate correlated significantly with increasing APR-DRG ROM scores (p < 0.0001). Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that, after adjusting for patient age and disease group, APR-DRG ROM was significantly associated with mortality risk in patients, with a one unit increase in APR-DRG ROM associated with a 3-fold increase in mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

APR-DRG ROM correlates closely with ICU mortality. Already available for many hospitalized patients around the world, it may provide a readily available means for severity-adjustment when physiologic scoring is not available.

摘要

目的

评估急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APR - DRG)死亡风险(ROM)评分作为重症监护病房(ICU)死亡风险校正指标的性能。

设计

对医院死亡率进行回顾性分析。

地点

位于纽约大都市的一所大学医院的内科重症监护病房。

患者

2004年2月至2006年3月期间收治的1213例患者。

主要结果

死亡率与APR - DRG ROM评分升高显著相关(p < 0.0001)。多因素逻辑回归分析表明,在调整患者年龄和疾病组后,APR - DRG ROM与患者死亡风险显著相关,APR - DRG ROM每增加一个单位,死亡风险增加3倍。

结论

APR - DRG ROM与ICU死亡率密切相关。全球许多住院患者都已使用该评分系统,在无法进行生理评分时,它可能提供一种现成的病情严重程度校正方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be98/2990229/6619efad1c6b/ccrpm-2008-019f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be98/2990229/6619efad1c6b/ccrpm-2008-019f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be98/2990229/6619efad1c6b/ccrpm-2008-019f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of the All Patient Refined-Diagnosis Related Group (APR-DRG) Risk of Mortality Score as a Severity Adjustor in the Medical ICU.在医学重症监护病房中使用全患者精细化诊断相关组(APR-DRG)死亡风险评分作为严重程度调整指标。
Clin Med Circ Respirat Pulm Med. 2008 Apr 18;2:19-25. doi: 10.4137/ccrpm.s544.
2
Association of the All-Patient Refined Diagnosis-Related Groups Severity of Illness and Risk of Mortality Classification with Outcomes.全患者精细化诊断相关分组疾病严重程度及死亡风险分类与结局的关联
South Med J. 2021 Oct;114(10):668-674. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001306.
3
Validation of the All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Group (APR-DRG) Risk of Mortality and Severity of Illness Modifiers as a Measure of Perioperative Risk.验证全患者精细化诊断相关分组(APR-DRG)死亡率风险和疾病严重程度调整因子作为围手术期风险的衡量标准。
J Med Syst. 2018 Mar 22;42(5):81. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-0936-3.
4
Predictive validity of the All Patients Refined Diagnosis Related Group modifiers for costs and outcomes from intracranial hemorrhage.全患者精细化诊断相关组调整因子对颅内出血的成本和结果的预测效度。
J Neurosurg. 2023 Mar 31;139(4):1061-1069. doi: 10.3171/2023.2.JNS222255. Print 2023 Oct 1.
5
All Patient Refined-Diagnosis Related Groups' (APR-DRGs) Severity of Illness and Risk of Mortality as predictors of in-hospital mortality.所有患者精细化诊断相关分组(APR-DRGs)的疾病严重程度和死亡率风险作为院内死亡率的预测因素。
J Med Syst. 2022 May 6;46(6):37. doi: 10.1007/s10916-022-01805-3.
6
Severity of illness and risk of mortality in Mayo Clinic's virtual hybrid advanced care at home program: a retrospective cohort study.梅奥诊所虚拟混合高级居家照护计划的疾病严重程度和死亡风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 27;23(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09333-7.
7
[Quality of data or quality of care? Comparison of diverse standarization methods by clinical severity, based on the discharge form, in the analysis of hospital mortality].[数据质量还是医疗质量?在基于出院表格分析医院死亡率时,按临床严重程度比较不同的标准化方法]
Epidemiol Prev. 1999 Oct-Dec;23(4):286-93.
8
The ICD-9-based illness severity score: a new model that outperforms both DRG and APR-DRG as predictors of survival and resource utilization.基于国际疾病分类第九版(ICD-9)的疾病严重程度评分:一种优于诊断相关分组(DRG)和全病种预付费制度(APR-DRG)的预测生存和资源利用的新模型。
J Trauma. 1998 Oct;45(4):791-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199810000-00032.
9
The association of inpatient blood utilization and diagnosis-related group weight: implications for risk-adjusted benchmarking.住院患者血液利用与诊断相关组权重的关联:对风险调整基准测试的影响。
Transfusion. 2019 Jul;59(7):2316-2323. doi: 10.1111/trf.15343. Epub 2019 May 20.
10
The trauma registry compared to All Patient Refined Diagnosis Groups (APR-DRG).与所有患者精细诊断分组(APR-DRG)相比的创伤登记。
Injury. 2017 May;48(5):1063-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.12.026. Epub 2016 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of hospital-level continuous kidney replacement therapy use and mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury.医院层面连续性肾脏替代治疗的使用与急性肾损伤重症患者死亡率的关联
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-07993-z.
2
Assessing the impact of perioperative allogenic blood transfusion in spinal surgery: a comprehensive systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis.评估围手术期异体输血在脊柱手术中的影响:一项全面的系统评价、荟萃分析和元回归分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Apr 26;48(1):389. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03509-x.
3
DRGKB: a knowledgebase of worldwide diagnosis-related groups' practices for comparison, evaluation and knowledge-guided application.

本文引用的文献

1
Critical care performance measurement: the time has come for all.重症监护绩效评估:对所有人来说时机已到。
Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1538-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000216184.53553.DC.
2
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)IV:当今危重症患者的医院死亡率评估
Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1297-310. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215112.84523.F0.
3
Improving the ICU: part 1.改善重症监护病房:第一部分。
DRGKB:一个用于比较、评估和知识引导应用的全球诊断相关分组实践知识库。
Database (Oxford). 2024 Jun 6;2024. doi: 10.1093/database/baae046.
4
Disparities in Outcomes of Hospitalizations Due to Multiple Myeloma: A Nationwide Comparison.多发性骨髓瘤住院治疗结果的差异:一项全国性比较。
Cureus. 2023 Oct 19;15(10):e47319. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47319. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography in patients with liver transplant.肝移植患者内镜逆行胰胆管造影的结果
Clin Exp Hepatol. 2022 Sep;8(3):226-232. doi: 10.5114/ceh.2022.119246. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
6
Trends and Factors Associated With Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A National Perspective.呼吸机相关性肺炎的相关趋势及因素:全国视角
Cureus. 2022 Mar 29;14(3):e23634. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23634. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Pregnancy-Related Acute Kidney Injury.妊娠相关急性肾损伤的种族和民族差异。
Kidney360. 2020 Feb 12;1(3):169-178. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000102019. eCollection 2020 Mar 26.
8
Epidemiology and Outcomes of Hospitalizations Due to Hepatocellular Carcinoma.肝细胞癌住院治疗的流行病学与结局
Cureus. 2021 Dec 1;13(12):e20089. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20089. eCollection 2021 Dec.
9
Demographics and Risk Factors of Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension Readmissions.小儿肺动脉高压再入院的人口统计学和风险因素
Cureus. 2021 Oct 23;13(10):e18994. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18994. eCollection 2021 Oct.
10
Utilization Trends and Predictors of Non-invasive and Invasive Ventilation During Hospitalization Due to Community-Acquired Pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎住院期间无创和有创通气的使用趋势及预测因素
Cureus. 2021 Sep 14;13(9):e17954. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17954. eCollection 2021 Sep.
Chest. 2005 Jun;127(6):2151-64. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.6.2151.
4
Variation in outcomes in Veterans Affairs intensive care units with a computerized severity measure.使用计算机化严重程度测量法时退伍军人事务部重症监护病房的结果差异。
Crit Care Med. 2005 May;33(5):930-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000162497.86229.e9.
5
Scoring systems: is a fix needed?评分系统:是否需要修正?
Crit Care Med. 2005 Apr;33(4):894-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000159725.75514.11.
6
Adverse effect on a referral intensive care unit's performance of accepting patients transferred from another intensive care unit.对转诊重症监护病房接收从另一个重症监护病房转来的患者的表现产生的不利影响。
Crit Care Med. 2005 Apr;33(4):705-10. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000158518.32730.c5.
7
Evaluating the performance of an institution using an intensive care unit benchmark.使用重症监护病房基准评估机构的绩效。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2005 Feb;80(2):174-80. doi: 10.4065/80.2.174.
8
Prognostication and intensive care unit outcome: the evolving role of scoring systems.预后评估与重症监护病房结局:评分系统不断演变的作用。
Clin Chest Med. 2003 Dec;24(4):751-62. doi: 10.1016/s0272-5231(03)00094-7.
9
Training in data definitions improves quality of intensive care data.数据定义方面的培训可提高重症监护数据的质量。
Crit Care. 2003 Apr;7(2):179-84. doi: 10.1186/cc1886. Epub 2003 Feb 18.
10
External validation of the SAPS II, APACHE II and APACHE III prognostic models in South England: a multicentre study.英国南部SAPS II、APACHE II和APACHE III预后模型的外部验证:一项多中心研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Feb;29(2):249-56. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1607-9. Epub 2003 Jan 18.