University of Cambridge, Faculty of Economics, Cambridge, CB3 9DD, United Kingdom.
J Neurosci. 2010 Dec 15;30(50):17063-7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4879-10.2010.
Although many functional imaging studies have reported frontal activity associated with "cognitive control" tasks, little is understood about factors underlying individual differences in performance. Here we compared the behavior and brain structure of healthy controls with fighter pilots, an expert group trained to make precision choices at speed in the presence of conflicting cues. Two different behavioral paradigms--Eriksen Flanker and change of plan tasks--were used to assess the influence of distractors and the ability to update ongoing action plans. Fighter pilots demonstrated superior cognitive control as indexed by accuracy and postconflict adaptation on the Flanker task, but also showed increased sensitivity to irrelevant, distracting choices. By contrast, when pilots were examined on their ability to inhibit a current action plan in favor of an alternative response, their performance was no better than the control group. Diffusion weighted imaging revealed differences in white matter radial diffusivity between pilots and controls not only in the right dorsomedial frontal region but also in the right parietal lobe. Moreover, analysis of individual differences in reaction time costs for conflict trials on the Flanker task demonstrated significant correlations with radial diffusivity at these locations, but in different directions. Postconflict adaptation effects, however, were confined to the dorsomedial frontal locus. The findings demonstrate that in humans expert cognitive control may surprisingly be mediated by enhanced response gain to both relevant and irrelevant stimuli, and is accompanied by structural alterations in the white matter of the frontal and parietal lobe.
尽管许多功能成像研究报告了与“认知控制”任务相关的额区活动,但对于表现个体差异的潜在因素知之甚少。在这里,我们比较了健康对照组和战斗机飞行员的行为和大脑结构,后者是一组经过训练,能够在存在冲突线索的情况下快速做出精确选择的专家群体。使用了两种不同的行为范式——Eriksen Flanker 和计划改变任务,以评估分心物的影响和更新正在进行的行动计划的能力。战斗机飞行员在 Flanker 任务中的准确性和冲突后适应方面表现出更好的认知控制,但也表现出对不相关的、分散注意力的选择的更高敏感性。相比之下,当飞行员在抑制当前行动计划以支持替代反应的能力上进行检查时,他们的表现并不优于对照组。弥散张量成像显示,飞行员和对照组之间的白质放射状弥散度存在差异,不仅在右侧背内侧额区,而且在右侧顶叶。此外,对 Flanker 任务中冲突试验反应时成本的个体差异进行分析,显示与这些位置的放射状弥散度存在显著相关性,但方向不同。冲突后适应效应仅限于背内侧额区。研究结果表明,在人类中,专家认知控制可能出乎意料地通过增强对相关和不相关刺激的反应增益来介导,并且伴随着额叶和顶叶白质的结构改变。