Defending my "rethinking" of Roe.
作者信息
Manninen Bertha Alvarez
机构信息
Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85069, USA.
出版信息
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Dec;10(12):W3-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.530911.
PMID:21161830
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Defending my "rethinking" of Roe.为我对罗诉韦德案的“重新思考”辩护。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Dec;10(12):W3-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.530911.
2
Rethinking Roe v. Wade: defending the abortion right in the face of contemporary opposition.重新思考罗诉韦德案：面对当代的反对，捍卫堕胎权。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Dec;10(12):33-46. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.528508.
3
Fetuses are neither violinists nor violators.胎儿既不是小提琴家也不是侵犯者。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Dec;10(12):53-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.528513.
4
Abortion: rights, responsibilities, obligations.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Dec;10(12):63-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.530914.
5
A supportive yet critical response to "Rethinking Roe v. Wade: defending the abortion right in the face of contemporary opposition".对《重新思考罗诉韦德案：在当代反对声中捍卫堕胎权》的一种支持但批判性的回应。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Dec;10(12):61-3. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.528527.
6
Abortion and moral arguments from analogy.堕胎与基于类比的道德论证。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Dec;10(12):59-61. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.530909.
7
Manninen's defense of abortion rights is unsuccessful.曼宁宁对堕胎权利的辩护是不成功的。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Dec;10(12):56-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.528516.
8
Let's rethink Roe v. Wade--and overturn it.让我们重新审视罗诉韦德案，并推翻它。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Dec;10(12):65-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.528528.
9
Abortion, secular dogma, and the sacrament of sex: another failed attempt to impose moral idiosyncrasies through the ruse of argument.堕胎、世俗教条与性的圣礼：又一次试图通过诡辩来强加道德特质的失败尝试。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Dec;10(12):51-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.530915.
10
The unacknowledged consensus on abortion.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Dec;10(12):57-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.528523.
Zotero 插件