• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工制品和生物体的个体性。

The individuality of artifacts and organisms.

机构信息

University of Texas at El Paso, Dept. of Philosophy, University of Texas, El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA.

出版信息

Hist Philos Life Sci. 2010;32(2-3):233-46.

PMID:21162369
Abstract

Is there any genuine difference between organisms and artifacts? Where and how would we identify such a difference? This paper argues the difference involves the character of their individuality. Unlike an organism, an artifact's individuality is (for the most part) determined by the function that the designer selected in the artifact's production rather than the functional interdependence of its parts. In both cases, individuality is a historical property and in both cases the parts may be functionally interdependent to some extent. However, for artifacts, this interdependence is not what makes it the individual that it is. Instead, the interdependence of its parts is in the service of the functions for which the spear was designed. No such additional purpose or function exists for an organism.

摘要

生物体和人工制品之间是否存在真正的区别?我们在哪里以及如何识别这种区别?本文认为,这种区别涉及到它们个体性的特征。与生物体不同,人工制品的个体性(在大多数情况下)是由设计者在制品生产中选择的功能决定的,而不是由其部件的功能相互依存决定的。在这两种情况下,个体性都是历史属性,而且在这两种情况下,部件在某种程度上可能是功能相互依存的。然而,对于人工制品来说,这种相互依存并不是使它成为个体的原因。相反,其部件的相互依存是为了满足设计长矛的功能。生物体不存在这样的额外目的或功能。

相似文献

1
The individuality of artifacts and organisms.人工制品和生物体的个体性。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2010;32(2-3):233-46.
2
Do organisms have an ontological status?生物是否具有本体论地位?
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2010;32(2-3):195-231.
3
What is an "organism"? On the occurrence of a new term and its conceptual transformations 1680-1850.什么是“生物体”?一个新术语的出现及其在 1680 年至 1850 年间的概念转变。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2010;32(2-3):155-94.
4
What makes genetically modified organisms so distasteful?是什么让转基因生物如此令人反感?
Trends Biotechnol. 2001 Oct;19(10):424-7. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7799(01)01767-X.
5
The great biologic problem: vitalism, materialism, and the philosophy of organism.重大生物学问题:活力论、唯物论与机体哲学
N Y State J Med. 1986 Feb;86(2):81-8.
6
The concept of organism: historical philosophical, scientific perspectives.有机体的概念:历史的哲学、科学视角。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2010;32(2-3):147-54.
7
[Life science and philosophy in the l7th and l8th centuries. "Metaphysics of the Embryo. Science of Life and Philosophy from Malpighi to Spallanzani (1672-1793)". By Walter Bernardi. Essay review].
Hist Philos Life Sci. 1987;9(2):327-32.
8
Dialectics in the evolution of human understanding with regard to advancing knowledge of the function of the nervous system.
Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc Fac Med. 1985;112:139-55.
9
The organism as ontological go-between: hybridity, boundaries and degrees of reality in its conceptual history.作为本体论中介的有机体:其概念史中的混杂性、边界与现实程度
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2014 Dec;48 Pt B:151-61. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
10
Becoming organisms: the organisation of development and the development of organisation.成为生物体:发育的组织和组织的发育。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2010;32(2-3):289-315.