Lian Hui-bo, Guo Hong-qian, Gan Wei-dong, Li Xiao-gong, Yan Xiang, Zhang Shi-wei, Qu Feng, Yao Lin-fang, Zhang Gu-tian
Department of Urology, Medical College of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China.
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Jun 1;48(11):834-7.
To compare the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic cryoablation (LCA) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Between April 2005 and March 2009, 47 patients were treated with minimally invasive nephron sparing surgery (LPN or LCA) for RCC. The LCA group included 18 selected primary RCC cases (14 men and 4 women, mean age 63 years). There were 6 tumors located in the left, 11 located in the right and 1 located bilaterally. The maximum diameter of tumors was 1.5 - 5.0 cm (mean: 2.9 cm). The LPN group included 29 renal tumors patients (19 men and 10 women, mean age 61 years). The maximum diameter of tumors in this group was 2.0 - 4.5 cm (mean: 2.8 cm). Changes of hemoglobin (Hb), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum creatinine (SCr) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) after operations were compared between LCA group and LPN group. The operative time, average intra-operative bleeding volume, postoperative hospital stay and incidence of postoperative complications of the 2 groups were analyzed and compared.
The 2 surgical procedures were both successful. There was no significant change of Hb, ESR, SCr and GFR after operations in LCA group and LPN group (P > 0.05). The operative time was (94 ± 29) min and (146 ± 45) min in LCA group and LPN group, respectively. The average estimated blood loss was (37 ± 20) ml and (274 ± 69) ml. The postoperative hospital stay was (4 ± 2) d and (10 ± 2) d. These differences between the 2 groups were significant (P < 0.01). No laparoscopic operative complications were noted in LCA group. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1, 3, and 6 months identified the punched-out, nonenhancing, spontaneously resorbing, renal cryolesion. LCA group had completed a minimum follow-up of 6 months (mean 16, range 6 to 21 months). No evidence of local or port-site recurrence was found, and no patient developed metastatic disease. 3 - 36 months' (mean 20 months) follow-up showed no recurrence of tumors or metastatic disease in LPN group.
LCA for RCC is an accurate and effective intervention with a relatively low incidence of complications, and is superior to LPN in operative time, intraoperative bleeding volume and postoperative recovery.
比较腹腔镜冷冻消融术(LCA)与腹腔镜部分肾切除术(LPN)治疗肾细胞癌(RCC)的临床疗效。
2005年4月至2009年3月期间,47例患者接受了微创保肾手术(LPN或LCA)治疗RCC。LCA组包括18例经选择的原发性RCC病例(14例男性和4例女性,平均年龄63岁)。其中6个肿瘤位于左侧,11个位于右侧,1个为双侧。肿瘤最大直径为1.5 - 5.0 cm(平均:2.9 cm)。LPN组包括29例肾肿瘤患者(19例男性和10例女性,平均年龄61岁)。该组肿瘤最大直径为2.0 - 4.5 cm(平均:2.8 cm)。比较LCA组和LPN组术后血红蛋白(Hb)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)、血清肌酐(SCr)和肾小球滤过率(GFR)的变化。分析并比较两组的手术时间、平均术中出血量、术后住院时间及术后并发症发生率。
两种手术均成功。LCA组和LPN组术后Hb、ESR、SCr和GFR均无显著变化(P > 0.05)。LCA组和LPN组的手术时间分别为(94 ± 29)分钟和(146 ± 45)分钟。平均估计失血量分别为(37 ± 20)毫升和(274 ± 69)毫升。术后住院时间分别为(4 ± 2)天和(10 ± 2)天。两组之间的这些差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。LCA组未发现腹腔镜手术并发症。术后1、3和6个月的随访磁共振成像(MRI)显示了肾冷冻损伤灶呈凹陷状、无强化、可自发吸收。LCA组至少随访了6个月(平均16个月,范围6至21个月)。未发现局部或穿刺部位复发的证据,也没有患者发生转移性疾病。LPN组3 - 36个月(平均20个月)的随访显示无肿瘤复发或转移性疾病。
LCA治疗RCC是一种准确有效的干预措施,并发症发生率相对较低,在手术时间、术中出血量及术后恢复方面优于LPN。