Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Feb;23(1):60-7. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzq073. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
To evaluate the patients' opinion on the usefulness of the electronic medical card (EMC) and continuity-of-care report in enhancing quality of care, and to assess the effects of the patient-entered data on the quality of data in the electronic medical record (EMR).
A structured survey assessed patients' opinion on the usefulness of the EMC and continuity-of-care report. The accuracy of EMR data involved comparing the patient-entered data in the continuity-of-care report with the healthcare-provider-entered data in the EMR. The analysis assessed whether the EMR information was consistent with the patient-entered data. A data completeness evaluation compared data entries in the EMR collected before and after the use of continuity-of-care record application.
One hundred and thirty-three patients used the application, of which 76% who had actually used the EMC and continuity-of-care report to seek medical care and/or update EMR information were surveyed. Age was associated with the reported usefulness of the documents. Few users (16%) printed the continuity-of-care reports to take to their healthcare providers for data updates and fewer (9%) to correct errors in the EMR. Overall, 68% of patients found the documents to be useful.
Patients reported that the EMC and continuity-of-care report were useful in enhancing quality of care. They were able to identify missing or erroneous data in the EMR data, making them an important source of quality control for their information in the healthcare-provider-maintained EMR.
评估患者对电子病历(EMC)和连续护理报告在提高医疗质量方面的实用性的看法,并评估患者输入数据对电子病历(EMR)数据质量的影响。
一项结构调查评估了患者对 EMC 和连续护理报告的实用性的看法。EMR 数据的准确性通过将连续护理报告中的患者输入数据与 EMR 中医疗保健提供者输入的数据进行比较来评估。分析评估了 EMR 信息是否与患者输入的数据一致。数据完整性评估比较了使用连续护理记录应用程序前后 EMR 中的数据条目。
有 133 名患者使用了该应用程序,其中 76%的实际使用过 EMC 和连续护理报告来就医和/或更新 EMR 信息的患者接受了调查。年龄与文档的实用性报告有关。少数用户(16%)打印了连续护理报告,以便将其带给医疗保健提供者进行数据更新,而较少的用户(9%)则更正 EMR 中的错误。总体而言,68%的患者认为这些文件有用。
患者报告称,EMC 和连续护理报告有助于提高医疗质量。他们能够识别 EMR 数据中缺失或错误的数据,使其成为医疗保健提供者维护的 EMR 中他们信息质量控制的重要来源。