Department of Neuroradiology, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Neurosurgery. 2011 Mar;68(3):641-7; discussion 647-8. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820773cf.
Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) can be sporadic or inherited, the latter characterized by multiple lesions. Novel imaging sequences have increased the sensitivity of detecting multiple CCMs.
To compare T2-weighted gradient echo (T2*GRE) and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) sequences in familial and sporadic CCM to assess their respective sensitivity.
This prospective study included 23 consecutive cases grouped as multifocal/familial CCMs (n=14), solitary/clustered sporadic CCMs with developmental venous anomaly (n=8), and postirradiation CCMs (n=1). Brain magnetic resonance imaging included T2*GRE and SWI sequences. Two radiologists independently counted the number of lesions on each sequence. The difference in the number of lesions on both sequences was compared, and interobserver agreement was evaluated.
In multifocal/familial cases, a mean of 34.7 lesions were detected on T2GRE and 66.9 on SWI (P=.001). The difference of lesion prevalence with the 2 techniques was significant (P=.006), with strong interobserver correlation for the T2GRE sequence (P<.001) and SWI sequence (P<.001). Patients with solitary/clustered sporadic CCMs, including those associated with venous anomaly, had no difference in lesion prevalence in the 2 sequences.
SWI is more sensitive than T2GRE in detecting CCM in multifocal/familial CCMs. Among cases classified as solitary/clustered with conventional imaging, including those associated with venous anomaly, the SWI did not impart additional sensitivity or reveal occult lesions not evident on T2GRE sequence. No case was changed from the solitary/clustered to the multifocal clinical category because of SWI.
脑海绵状血管畸形(CCM)可为散发性或遗传性,后者以多发病变为特征。新的成像序列提高了检测多发病变 CCM 的敏感性。
比较 T2 加权梯度回波(T2*GRE)和磁敏感加权成像(SWI)序列在家族性和散发性 CCM 中的应用,以评估它们各自的敏感性。
本前瞻性研究纳入 23 例连续病例,分为多灶性/家族性 CCM(n=14)、伴发育性静脉异常的单发/簇状散发性 CCM(n=8)和放射性后 CCM(n=1)。脑磁共振成像包括 T2*GRE 和 SWI 序列。两位放射科医生独立计数每个序列的病变数量。比较两种序列上病变数量的差异,并评估观察者间的一致性。
在多灶性/家族性病例中,T2GRE 上平均检测到 34.7 个病变,SWI 上平均检测到 66.9 个病变(P=.001)。两种技术检测到的病变患病率存在差异(P=.006),T2GRE 序列(P<.001)和 SWI 序列(P<.001)的观察者间相关性均较强。伴有静脉异常的单发/簇状散发性 CCM 患者,两种序列上的病变患病率无差异。
SWI 在检测多发病变家族性 CCM 中的敏感性优于 T2GRE。在包括伴有静脉异常的单发/簇状病例中,SWI 并未增加敏感性或显示 T2GRE 序列上未显示的隐匿性病变。由于 SWI,没有病例从单发/簇状改变为多发病变的临床类别。