Suppr超能文献

托盘胶的干燥时间对聚硅氧烷印模和托盘树脂材料之间足够的拉伸粘结强度的影响。

Drying time of tray adhesive for adequate tensile bond strength between polyvinylsiloxane impression and tray resin material.

机构信息

Graduate student, Ilsan Hospital, Department of Dental Science, The Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Adv Prosthodont. 2009 Jul;1(2):63-7. doi: 10.4047/jap.2009.1.2.63. Epub 2009 Jul 31.

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Use of custom tray and tray adhesive is clinically recommended for elastomeric impression material. However there is not clear mention of drying time of tray adhesive in achieving appropriate bonding strength of tray material and impression material.

PURPOSE

This study is to investigate an appropriate drying time of tray adhesives by evaluating tensile bonding strength between two types of polyvinylsiloxane impression materials and resin tray, according to various drying time intervals of tray adhesives, and with different manufacturing company combination of impression material and tray adhesive.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Adhesives used in this study were Silfix (Dentsply Caulk, Milford, Del, USA) and VPS Tray Adhesive (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) and impression materials were Aquasil Ultra (monophase regular set, Dentsply Caulk, Milford, Del, USA) and Imprint II Garant (regular body, 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany). They were used combinations from the same manufacture and exchanged combinations of the two. The drying time was designed to air dry, 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, 20 minutes, and 25 minutes. Total 240 of test specimens were prepared by auto-polymerizing tray material (Instant Tray Mix, Lang, Wheeling, Il, USA) with 10 specimens in each group. The specimens were placed in the Universal Testing machine (Instron, model 3366, Instron Corp, University avenue, Nowood, MA, USA) to perform the tensile test (cross head speed 5 mm/min). The statistically efficient drying time was evaluated through ANOVA and Scheffe test. All the tests were performed at 95% confidence level.

RESULTS

The results revealed that at least 10 minutes is needed for Silfix-Aquasil, and 15 minutes for VPS Tray Adhesive-Imprint II, to attain an appropriate tensile bonding strength. VPS Tray Adhesive-Imprint II had a superior tensile bonding strength when compared to Silfix-Aquasil over 15 minutes. Silfix-Aquasil had a superior bonding strength to VPS Tray Adhesive-Aquasil, and VPS Tray Adhesive-Imprint II had a superior tensile bonding strength to Silfix-Imprint II at all drying periods.

CONCLUSION

Significant increase in tensile bonding strength with Silfix-Aquasil and VPS Tray adhesive-Imprint II combination until 10 and 15 minutes respectively. Tray adhesive-impression material combination from the same company presented higher tensile bonding strength at all drying time intervals than when using tray adhesive-impression material of different manufactures.

摘要

问题陈述

临床推荐使用定制托盘和托盘胶来进行弹性印模材料的制取。然而,对于托盘胶的干燥时间,目前尚无明确说明,其会影响托盘材料与印模材料之间的粘结强度。

目的

本研究通过评估两种聚硅氧烷印模材料与树脂托盘之间的拉伸粘结强度,旨在探讨不同托盘胶干燥时间间隔下,以及使用同一厂家或不同厂家的印模材料和托盘胶组合时,获得合适的托盘胶粘结强度所需的适当干燥时间。

材料与方法

本研究使用的托盘胶分别为 Silfix(登士柏,米尔福德,德拉瓦,美国)和 VPS Tray Adhesive(3M ESPE,锡夫费尔德,德国),印模材料分别为 Aquasil Ultra(单相常规凝固,登士柏,米尔福德,德拉瓦,美国)和 Imprint II Garant(常规体,3M ESPE,锡夫费尔德,德国)。我们使用同一厂家的产品组合,并交换两种产品的组合。干燥时间设计为空气干燥 5 分钟、10 分钟、15 分钟、20 分钟和 25 分钟。使用自动聚合托盘材料(Instant Tray Mix,Lang,惠灵,伊利诺伊州,美国)制备了总共 240 个测试样本,每组 10 个样本。将样本放置在万能试验机(Instron,型号 3366,Instron 公司,大学大道,新伍德,马萨诸塞州,美国)中进行拉伸测试(十字头速度 5mm/min)。通过方差分析和谢夫测试评估了具有统计学效率的干燥时间。所有测试均在 95%置信水平下进行。

结果

结果表明,Silfix-Aquasil 需要至少 10 分钟,VPS Tray Adhesive-Imprint II 需要 15 分钟,才能达到适当的拉伸粘结强度。与 15 分钟以上的 Silfix-Aquasil 相比,VPS Tray Adhesive-Imprint II 具有更高的拉伸粘结强度。Silfix-Aquasil 在所有干燥时间段的粘结强度均优于 VPS Tray Adhesive-Aquasil,VPS Tray Adhesive-Imprint II 在所有干燥时间段的粘结强度均优于 Silfix-Imprint II。

结论

Silfix-Aquasil 和 VPS Tray Adhesive-Imprint II 组合的拉伸粘结强度均显著增加,分别在 10 分钟和 15 分钟时达到最大值。同一厂家的托盘胶-印模材料组合在所有干燥时间间隔下的拉伸粘结强度均高于使用不同厂家的托盘胶-印模材料组合。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验