• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于诊断相关分组(DRG)的全支付方前瞻性支付系统(PPS):对创伤护理报销的财务影响及损失最小化方法。

An all-payor prospective payment system (PPS) based on diagnosis-related-groups (DRG): financial impact on reimbursement for trauma care and approaches to minimizing loss.

作者信息

Joy S A, Yurt R W

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Cornell University Medical College, New York, NY.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1990 Jul;30(7):866-73. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199007000-00017.

DOI:10.1097/00005373-199007000-00017
PMID:2116534
Abstract

To assess the financial impact of the new all-payor prospective payment system (PPS), data for 430 patients admitted to a Level I Trauma Center were compared to all hospital discharges (n = 35,309). Trauma patients had a LOS of 13.1 days, average Trauma Score of 15, and operating loss for trauma patients totalled $1,310,625. Trauma as compared to all patients showed a greater variance in LOS (6.3 vs. 2.0 days), a higher case mix index (CMI) (1.93 vs. 1.40), and a greater loss per case (-$3,404 vs. -$979), respectively. The trauma group DRG weights correlated with revenue (r = 0.89; p less than 0.0001); however, there was no relation to profit/loss. Review of trauma patients' records revealed inaccurate coding. Corrections led to an increase in reimbursement of $132,000. Five DRGs were added in 1989 for multiple significant trauma (MST). Using the 1989 grouper, 30 patients were reassigned, with an increase in reimbursement of $250,000. Although these strategies reduce operating deficit by 29%, reimbursement for trauma care must be addressed further.

摘要

为评估新的全付费方前瞻性支付系统(PPS)的财务影响,将一家一级创伤中心收治的430例患者的数据与所有医院出院患者(n = 35,309)的数据进行了比较。创伤患者的住院时间为13.1天,平均创伤评分为15分,创伤患者的运营亏损总计1,310,625美元。与所有患者相比,创伤患者的住院时间差异更大(6.3天对2.0天),病例组合指数(CMI)更高(1.93对1.40),每例亏损更大(-3,404美元对-979美元)。创伤组的诊断相关分组(DRG)权重与收入相关(r = 0.89;p小于0.0001);然而,与利润/亏损无关。对创伤患者记录的审查发现编码不准确。更正导致报销增加了132,000美元。1989年增加了五个用于多发性严重创伤(MST)的DRG。使用1989年的分组器,重新分配了30例患者,报销增加了250,000美元。尽管这些策略使运营赤字减少了29%,但创伤护理的报销问题仍需进一步解决。

相似文献

1
An all-payor prospective payment system (PPS) based on diagnosis-related-groups (DRG): financial impact on reimbursement for trauma care and approaches to minimizing loss.基于诊断相关分组(DRG)的全支付方前瞻性支付系统(PPS):对创伤护理报销的财务影响及损失最小化方法。
J Trauma. 1990 Jul;30(7):866-73. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199007000-00017.
2
DRG reimbursement for trauma: the demise of the trauma center (the use of ISS grouping as an early predictor of total hospital cost).创伤的诊断相关分组(DRG)报销:创伤中心的衰落(使用损伤严重度评分(ISS)分组作为医院总成本的早期预测指标)
J Trauma. 1988 Jul;28(7):939-46.
3
The relationship between hospital per diem billing and DRG reimbursement for urban trauma patients.城市创伤患者的医院每日计费与诊断相关分组(DRG)报销之间的关系。
J Med Syst. 1995 Oct;19(5):375-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02260826.
4
Multiple significant trauma diagnosis related groups: analysis and national projections based on the first year in an all-payor prospective payment system.多重严重创伤诊断相关分组:基于全支付方前瞻性支付系统第一年数据的分析及全国预测
J Trauma. 1992 Mar;32(3):328-34; discussion 334-5.
5
Trauma case mix and hospital payment: the potential for refining DRGs.创伤病例组合与医院支付:完善诊断相关分组的潜力。
Health Serv Res. 1991 Apr;26(1):5-26.
6
DRG prospective, "all payor systems," financial risk, and hospital cost in pulmonary medicine non CC stratified DRGs.肺科非复杂并发症分层诊断相关分组中的诊断相关分组前瞻性、“所有支付方系统”、财务风险和医院成本
Chest. 1988 Oct;94(4):855-61. doi: 10.1378/chest.94.4.855.
7
Paying a premium: how patient complexity affects costs and profit margins.支付溢价:患者复杂性如何影响成本和利润率。
Ann Surg. 1999 Jun;229(6):807-11; discussion 811-4. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199906000-00007.
8
The impact of prospective reimbursement on trauma centers. An alternative payment plan.
Arch Surg. 1986 Apr;121(4):479-83. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400040117019.
9
Trauma care reimbursement: comparison of DRGs to an injury severity-based payment system.创伤护理报销:疾病诊断相关分组(DRGs)与基于损伤严重程度的支付系统的比较。
J Trauma. 1991 Feb;31(2):210-6.
10
The effect of the new trauma DRGs on reimbursement.新创伤诊断相关分组对报销的影响。
J Trauma. 1992 Oct;33(4):495-502; discussion 502-3. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199210000-00002.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic evaluation of inpatient medication reconciliation with a subtraction strategy.采用减法策略对住院患者用药核对进行的经济学评估。
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Jun 21;15(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00649-0.
2
Challenges and Adverse Outcomes of Implementing Reimbursement Mechanisms Based on the Diagnosis-Related Group Classification System: A systematic review.基于诊断相关分组分类系统实施报销机制的挑战与不良后果:一项系统综述
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2020 Aug;20(3):e260-e270. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2020.20.03.004. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
3
The relationship between hospital per diem billing and DRG reimbursement for urban trauma patients.
城市创伤患者的医院每日计费与诊断相关分组(DRG)报销之间的关系。
J Med Syst. 1995 Oct;19(5):375-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02260826.
4
The relationship between hospital per diem billing and DRG reimbursement for urban trauma patients.城市创伤患者的医院每日计费与诊断相关分组(DRG)报销之间的关系。
J Med Syst. 1995 Aug;19(4):353-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02257265.
5
[What can the hospital deliver? What must the hospital deliver?].[医院能提供什么?医院必须提供什么?]
Unfallchirurgie. 1995 Aug;21(4):204-18. doi: 10.1007/BF02588701.
6
[Documentation and ADP in trauma surgery--a status report].
Unfallchirurgie. 1991 Oct;17(5):297-302. doi: 10.1007/BF02588411.