Khorsand A, Gyöngyösi M, Sochor H, Maurer G, Karanikas G, Dudczak R, Schuster E, Porenta G, Graf S
Aliasghar Khorsand, PhD., Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Nuklearmedizin. 2011;50(1):9-14. doi: 10.3413/nukmed-0350-10-09. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
We compared and delineated possible differences of model-based analysis of ECG-gated SPECT using (⁹⁹m)Tc-sestamibi (Tc-SPECT) with ECG-gated ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET (FDG-PET) for determination of end-diastolic (EDV) and end-systolic (ESV) cardiac volumes, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and myocardial mass (LVMM).
PATIENTS, METHODS: 24 patients (21 men; age: 54±12years) with coronary artery disease underwent Tc-SPECT and FDG-PET imaging for evaluation of myocardial perfusion and viability. By using model-based analysis EDV, ESV, LVEF and LVMM were calculated from short axis images of both Tc-SPECT and FDG-PET.
Left ventricular volumes by Tc-SPECT and FDG-PET were 176±60 ml and 181±59 ml for EDV, and 97±44 ml and 103±45 ml for ESV respectively, LVEF was 47±8% by Tc-SPECT and 45±9% by FDG-PET. The LVMM was 214±40 g (Tc-SPECT) and 202±43 g (FDG-PET) (all p = NS, paired t-test). A significant correlation was observed between Tc-SPECT and FDG-PET imaging for calculation of EDV (r = 0.93), ESV (r = 0.93), LVEF (r = 0.83) and LVMM (r = 0.72).
ECG-gated Tc-SPECT and FDG-PET using two tracers with different characteristics (perfusion versus metabolism) showed close agreement concerning measurements of left ventricular volumes, contractile function and myocardial mass by using a model-based analysis.
我们比较并描述了使用(⁹⁹m)锝-甲氧基异丁基异腈(Tc-SPECT)的心电图门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描(ECG-gated SPECT)与心电图门控¹⁸F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)在基于模型分析时,用于测定舒张末期(EDV)和收缩末期(ESV)心脏容积、左心室射血分数(LVEF)和心肌质量(LVMM)的可能差异。
患者、方法:24例(21例男性;年龄:54±12岁)冠状动脉疾病患者接受了Tc-SPECT和FDG-PET成像,以评估心肌灌注和存活情况。通过基于模型的分析,从Tc-SPECT和FDG-PET的短轴图像计算EDV、ESV、LVEF和LVMM。
Tc-SPECT和FDG-PET测得的左心室容积,EDV分别为176±60 ml和181±59 ml,ESV分别为97±44 ml和103±45 ml,LVEF通过Tc-SPECT测得为47±8%,通过FDG-PET测得为45±9%。LVMM为214±40 g(Tc-SPECT)和202±43 g(FDG-PET)(所有p=无显著性差异,配对t检验)。在计算EDV(r=0.93)、ESV(r=0.93)、LVEF(r=0.83)和LVMM(r=0.72)时,观察到Tc-SPECT和FDG-PET成像之间存在显著相关性。
使用具有不同特性(灌注与代谢)的两种示踪剂的心电图门控Tc-SPECT和FDG-PET,通过基于模型的分析,在左心室容积、收缩功能和心肌质量的测量方面显示出密切的一致性。