Suppr超能文献

随机对照试验中的经济评估。

Economic assessments in randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Bulpitt C J, Fletcher A E

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London, England.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 1990 Aug 6;153(S1):S16-9. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1990.tb136984.x.

Abstract

When comparing costs and benefits of different medical strategies, cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis and cost-benefit analysis may be used. Both direct and indirect costs and benefits must be considered. Integrating survival with a measure of quality of life such as a health status index permits calculation of quality of life adjusted years of survival (QALYS). In any trial where it is expected that a more expensive treatment is the most effective, a full economic assessment should be made. Examples are provided from the use of verapamil and propranolol in hypertension, naftidrofuryl in stroke and auranofin in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

摘要

在比较不同医疗策略的成本和效益时,可以使用成本效益分析、成本效用分析和成本效益分析。必须同时考虑直接和间接成本及效益。将生存情况与生活质量指标(如健康状况指数)相结合,可计算出生活质量调整生存年数(QALYs)。在任何预计更昂贵的治疗方法最有效的试验中,都应进行全面的经济评估。文中给出了使用维拉帕米和普萘洛尔治疗高血压、萘呋胺治疗中风以及金诺芬治疗类风湿关节炎的实例。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验