BHF Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Am Heart J. 2011 Jan;161(1):210-219.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.10.019.
Food and Drug Administration guidance now proposes that cardiovascular safety of new diabetes medicines be demonstrated. Consequently, trials should include a sufficient number of individuals with diabetes who are at high cardiovascular risk. We aimed to examine the impact of the presence of baseline cardiovascular disease and proteinuria, as binary criteria, on cardiovascular event rates in diabetes trials and to examine whether predicted primary end-point event rates are achieved.
we searched Medline and EMBASE English language records (January 1998-June 2010) for randomized controlled trials of antiplatelet, lipid-lowering, antihypertensive, and glucose-lowering agents with >1,000 diabetic subjects reporting at least one of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Weighted mean event rates (events/1,000 patient-years) were calculated. Data from published power calculations were also compared with achieved event rates.
twenty-nine trials met inclusion criteria. Weighted mean event rates in diabetic subjects with and those without baseline cardiovascular disease were, respectively, 28.9 and 10.0 for all-cause death, 16.7 and 3.6 for cardiovascular death, 23.1 and 5.2 for myocardial infarction, and 12.1 and 5.4 for stroke. Event rates in diabetic subjects with and those without proteinuria were, respectively, 39.9 and 6.3 for all-cause death and 18.7 and 1.2 for cardiovascular death. Nine of 11 relevant trials achieved primary end-point event rates clearly lower than predicted.
trials including diabetic subjects without cardiovascular disease or proteinuria generate few events and require substantial participant numbers to achieve adequate power. However, the presence of coexisting cardiovascular disease or proteinuria increases event rates multiple-fold. Such data should aid investigators designing diabetes end-point trials.
美国食品和药物管理局的指导原则现在提出,新的糖尿病药物的心血管安全性需要得到证明。因此,临床试验应该纳入足够数量的处于高心血管风险的糖尿病患者。我们旨在研究基线时存在心血管疾病和蛋白尿这两个二分法标准对糖尿病试验中心血管事件发生率的影响,并检验预测的主要终点事件发生率是否得到了实现。
我们检索了 Medline 和 EMBASE 英语文献记录(1998 年 1 月至 2010 年 6 月),纳入了超过 1000 例糖尿病患者的随机对照试验,这些患者报告了全因死亡、心血管死亡、心肌梗死和卒中等所有终点事件中的至少一种。计算了加权平均事件发生率(每 1000 例患者-年的事件数)。还比较了发表的功效计算数据与实际事件发生率。
29 项试验符合纳入标准。有基线心血管疾病和无基线心血管疾病的糖尿病患者的全因死亡、心血管死亡、心肌梗死和卒中等所有终点事件的加权平均发生率分别为 28.9 和 10.0、16.7 和 3.6、23.1 和 5.2、12.1 和 5.4。有蛋白尿和无蛋白尿的糖尿病患者的全因死亡和心血管死亡的加权平均发生率分别为 39.9 和 6.3、18.7 和 1.2。11 项相关试验中有 9 项实际的主要终点事件发生率明显低于预测值。
纳入无心血管疾病或蛋白尿的糖尿病患者的试验很少发生事件,需要大量的参与者数量才能达到足够的功效。然而,同时存在心血管疾病或蛋白尿会使事件发生率增加数倍。这些数据应该有助于研究人员设计糖尿病终点试验。