Suppr超能文献

使用欧洲胸外科协会(ESTS)数据库评估医疗注册数据质量的任务无关指标。

Task-independent metrics to assess the data quality of medical registries using the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) Database.

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Ancona, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Jul;40(1):91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.11.004. Epub 2010 Dec 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The quality of data collected into a database is of paramount importance in every analysis. No standardized methods are available to quantify the quality of data in medical registries. Expanding the work done in other fields, we aimed at developing a methodological approach to measure the quality of a thoracic surgical database, by using the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) Database.

METHODS

A selection of anonymized data collected in the ESTS Database from 2007 to 2009 was tested using appropriate data quality metrics: completeness, correctness, consistency and believability. Particularly, the believability value is obtained as a result of a min-max operation based on the evaluation of completeness, correctness and consistency. Completeness measures the number of missing values in each checked column of the database, and it is calculated as number of variables registered/number of variables expected. Correctness reflects the number of data units in error referring to a set of clearly defined criteria (number of correct data/number of all data counted) and consistency is calculated by verifying the number of data in conflict in the same recorded patient (number of consistent checks/total number of checks). The threshold selected to indicate good quality was 0.8.

RESULTS

A total of 49363 values were reviewed to obtain the quality indicators. The results of the data quality assessment for the analyzed section of the ESTS Database are all above the predefined threshold: completeness is 0.85, correctness 0.99 and consistency 0.98. The believability score of data in the database is 0.85.

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to apply task-independent metrics to measure the quality within the ESTS Database. This study may represent a template to be applied in the medical/surgical field to test the quality of data in clinical registries. Only registries with a high quality of data can be reliably used for scientific, managerial and credentialing purposes.

摘要

目的

在每项分析中,纳入数据库的数据质量都至关重要。目前尚无标准化方法可用于量化医学注册数据库的数据质量。本研究旨在扩展其他领域的工作,旨在通过使用欧洲胸外科医师学会(ESTS)数据库,开发一种衡量胸外科数据库质量的方法。

方法

使用适当的数据质量指标测试 2007 年至 2009 年 ESTS 数据库中收集的部分匿名数据:完整性、正确性、一致性和可信度。特别是,可信度值是基于对完整性、正确性和一致性的评估进行的 min-max 操作的结果。完整性衡量数据库中每个检查列的缺失值数量,其计算方法为已注册变量数/预期变量数。正确性反映了参照一组明确定义的标准存在错误的数据单元数量(正确数据数量/计数的所有数据数量),而一致性则通过验证同一记录患者中存在冲突的数据数量进行计算(一致检查数量/总检查数量)。选择 0.8 作为表示高质量的阈值。

结果

为获得质量指标,共审查了 49363 个值。ESTS 数据库分析部分的数据质量评估结果均高于预定义阈值:完整性为 0.85,正确性为 0.99,一致性为 0.98。数据库中数据的可信度评分为 0.85。

结论

我们能够应用独立于任务的指标来衡量 ESTS 数据库中的质量。本研究可能为医疗/外科领域提供一个模板,用于测试临床注册数据库中的数据质量。只有具有高质量数据的注册才能可靠地用于科学、管理和认证目的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验