Suppr超能文献

利培酮口服液与标准片剂治疗精神分裂症患者的急性发作。

Risperidone oral solution versus standard tablets for the acute treatment of patients with schizophrenia.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.

出版信息

Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Mar 30;35(2):537-40. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.12.010. Epub 2010 Dec 17.

Abstract

The time required to attain the maximum plasma level of risperidone (RIS) is shorter for RIS oral solution (OS) than for RIS standard tablets (ST), although both forms have equal bioavailability. The objective of this study was to clarify whether RIS-OS shows a faster onset of efficacy and lower adverse events than RIS-ST. The two forms of risperidone were compared with respect to effectiveness including a speed of response, efficacy and tolerability. An open-label, 24-week, multicentre, randomized, flexible-dose study comparing the RIS-OS (mean dose, 3.7 mg; N=44) to the RIS-ST (mean dose, 3.7 mg; N=37) in acutely ill patients with schizophrenia showed no differences. Outcome measures included psychopathology, tolerability (extrapyramidal symptoms and serum prolactin), and Drug Attitude Inventory. This study was conducted between October 2006 and October 2008. Both RIS-OS- and RIS-ST-treated patients showed statistically significant reductions from the baseline in the mean scores of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)-total and PANSS-excite component, with no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups. The accumulated treatment response ratio was similar between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptom Scale score or serum prolactin increase between the treatment groups, but RIS-OS appeared to induce less serum prolactin increase than RIS-ST in drug-naïve female patients. Because there is no theoretical reason why this should be so, these results will require confirmation from a double-blind study in a larger sample. No significant difference was observed in the subjective drug attitude between the two groups. The original hypothesis that RIS-OS shows an earlier onset of efficacy or less adverse events than RIS-ST was not supported in this study. Subsequent studies should carefully establish the differences among various forms of antipsychotic drugs.

摘要

利培酮口服液(RIS-OS)达到最大血浆水平的时间短于利培酮标准片(RIS-ST),尽管两者具有同等的生物利用度。本研究的目的是阐明 RIS-OS 是否比 RIS-ST 更快起效,不良反应更低。比较了两种利培酮制剂的疗效,包括起效速度、疗效和耐受性。一项开放性、24 周、多中心、随机、灵活剂量研究比较了急性精神分裂症患者的 RIS-OS(平均剂量 3.7mg;N=44)和 RIS-ST(平均剂量 3.7mg;N=37),结果无差异。结果测量包括精神病学、耐受性(锥体外系症状和血清催乳素)和药物态度量表。这项研究于 2006 年 10 月至 2008 年 10 月进行。RIS-OS 和 RIS-ST 治疗的患者的阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)总分和 PANSS 兴奋成分的平均评分均从基线显著降低,治疗组之间无统计学差异。累积治疗反应率在两组之间相似。两组间药物诱导的锥体外系症状量表评分或血清催乳素增加无显著差异,但在未经药物治疗的女性患者中,RIS-OS 引起的血清催乳素增加似乎低于 RIS-ST。由于没有理论上的理由认为这是应该的,这些结果需要在更大的样本量的双盲研究中得到证实。两组间的主观药物态度无显著差异。本研究未支持 RIS-OS 比 RIS-ST 更早起效或不良反应更少的原始假设。随后的研究应仔细确定各种抗精神病药物之间的差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验