University of Michigan, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ann Arbor, 48108, USA.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Jan;90(1):47-54. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182017269.
The aims of this study were to develop and validate an instrument measuring attitudes toward providing health care to patients with disability, to compare the attitudes of preclinical and clinical medical students, and to examine whether sex, a background in disability, or career interest in physical medicine and rehabilitation affect medical student attitudes toward working with patients with disability.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted in an academic medical center with participants that included preclinical (n = 63) and clinical medical (n = 58) students, physical medicine and rehabilitation residents (n = 18), and internal medicine residents (n = 10). A 17-item Disability Attitudes in Health Care scale was developed based on existing, validated geriatrics attitudes scales. Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons Form O scale was used for correlation testing. Background demographic data collected from medical student respondents included sex, previous personal or work experience with disability, and career interest in physical medicine and rehabilitation.
The new scale demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach α = 0.74) and criterion validity (correlation coefficient = 0.54 with the Attitude Towards Disabled Persons scale). Attitudes were no different between preclinical and clinical medical students. Male medical students had more negative attitudes than female students did (P = 0.03). Students with a higher level of career interest in physical medicine and rehabilitation scored higher than less interested students did (P = 0.015).
The new Disability Attitudes in Health Care scale developed in this study shows good internal consistency and criterion validity. Attitudes toward caring for patients with disability seem to be unrelated to the standard medical education curriculum or previous experience with disability. Specific educational experiences may be designed to engender more positive attitudes toward providing health care to this patient population.
本研究旨在开发和验证一种衡量对残疾患者提供医疗保健态度的工具,比较临床医学专业医学生和临床前医学生的态度,并探讨性别、残疾背景或对物理医学与康复的职业兴趣是否会影响医学生对与残疾患者合作的态度。
在一所学术医学中心进行了横断面调查,参与者包括临床前(n = 63)和临床医学生(n = 58)、物理医学与康复住院医师(n = 18)和内科住院医师(n = 10)。根据现有的、经过验证的老年病学态度量表,开发了一个 17 项的医疗保健中的残疾态度量表。使用残疾人士态度量表 O 型进行相关测试。从医学生受访者中收集的背景人口统计学数据包括性别、以前的个人或工作残疾经历以及对物理医学与康复的职业兴趣。
新量表表现出较高的信度(Cronbach α = 0.74)和标准效度(与残疾人士态度量表的相关系数为 0.54)。临床前和临床医学生的态度没有差异。男性医学生的态度比女性学生更为消极(P = 0.03)。对物理医学与康复职业兴趣较高的学生比兴趣较低的学生得分更高(P = 0.015)。
本研究中开发的新的医疗保健中的残疾态度量表显示出较好的内部一致性和标准效度。对残疾患者护理的态度似乎与标准的医学教育课程或以前的残疾经历无关。可能需要设计特定的教育经验来培养对这一患者群体提供医疗保健的更积极态度。