Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michael G. de Groote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Med Sci Monit. 2011 Jan;17(1):RA12-7. doi: 10.12659/msm.881321.
Obtaining and critically appraising evidence is clearly not enough to make better decisions in clinical care. The evidence should be linked to the clinician's expertise, the patient's individual circumstances (including values and preferences), and clinical context and settings. We propose critical thinking and decision-making as the tools for making that link. Critical thinking is also called for in medical research and medical writing, especially where pre-canned methodologies are not enough. It is also involved in our exchanges of ideas at floor rounds, grand rounds and case discussions; our communications with patients and lay stakeholders in health care; and our writing of research papers, grant applications and grant reviews. Critical thinking is a learned process which benefits from teaching and guided practice like any discipline in health sciences. Training in critical thinking should be a part or a pre-requisite of the medical curriculum.
获取和批判性地评价证据显然不足以帮助我们在临床护理中做出更好的决策。证据应与临床医生的专业知识、患者的个体情况(包括价值观和偏好)以及临床背景和环境联系起来。我们提出批判性思维和决策作为建立这种联系的工具。批判性思维在医学研究和医学写作中也是必要的,特别是在预先设定的方法不够充分的情况下。它还涉及到我们在病房查房、大查房和病例讨论中的思想交流;我们与患者和医疗保健中的非专业利益相关者的沟通;以及我们撰写研究论文、资助申请和资助审查。批判性思维是一个学习过程,像健康科学中的任何学科一样,它受益于教学和指导实践。批判性思维培训应该是医学课程的一部分或前提条件。