Priest Susanna, Greenhalgh Ted, Kramer Victoria
J Nanopart Res. 2010 Jan;12(1):11-20. doi: 10.1007/s11051-009-9789-5. Epub 2009 Nov 5.
This article presents early results from an opinion formation study based on a 76-member panel of U.S. citizens, with comparison data from a group of 177 nanotechnology experts. While initially similar to the expert group in terms of their perceptions of the risks, benefits, and need for regulation characterizing several forms of nanotechnology, the first follow-up survey indicates that the panel is beginning to diverge from the experts, particularly with respect to perceptions of the levels of various "societal" risks that nanotechnology might present. The data suggest that responding to public concerns may involve more than attention to physical risks in areas such as health and environment; concerns about other forms of risk actually appear more salient.
本文展示了一项基于76名美国公民组成的小组的舆论形成研究的早期结果,并与一组177名纳米技术专家的比较数据进行了对比。虽然最初在对几种纳米技术形式的风险、益处和监管需求的认知方面,该小组与专家小组相似,但第一次跟踪调查表明,该小组开始与专家产生分歧,特别是在对纳米技术可能带来的各种“社会”风险水平的认知方面。数据表明,回应公众关切可能涉及的不仅仅是关注健康和环境等领域的物理风险;对其他形式风险的担忧实际上显得更为突出。