School of Environmental and Public Affairs, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
Risk Anal. 2011 Nov;31(11):1718-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01705.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
This article reports results from a three-year panel study of a nonrandom sample of 76 South Carolina citizens, recruited from a variety of walks of life, and their impressions of emerging nanotechnology. This discussion focuses on material from depth interviews conducted alongside a baseline opinion and awareness inventory at the beginning of the study, the most intensive data-gathering phase. These results are placed in the context of data from three additional surveys conducted at about equal intervals over the three years, plus exit interviews from 21 of the 34 individuals who completed the entire study. The results give insight into popular thinking about technology but little indication of strong emerging concerns, a trajectory of amplification of those concerns, or opinion polarization over time, despite some awareness of risks and potential ethical dimensions. Nanotechnology may stand out more as an example of risk attenuation than of risk amplification, consistent with most results from national surveys.
本文报告了一项为期三年的小组研究结果,该研究对南卡罗来纳州的 76 名非随机样本公民进行了研究,这些公民来自各行各业,他们对新兴纳米技术的看法。本讨论重点介绍了在研究开始时(即最密集的数据收集阶段)进行的基线意见和意识调查的同时进行的深度访谈的材料。这些结果与在这三年中每隔一段时间进行的另外三项调查的数据以及 34 名完成整个研究的人中的 21 人进行的离职访谈结合在一起。这些结果让我们深入了解了公众对技术的看法,但几乎没有表明存在强烈的新出现的问题、这些问题的放大轨迹,或者随着时间的推移意见的两极分化,尽管人们对风险和潜在的道德方面有一定的认识。纳米技术可能更像是风险减弱的一个例子,而不是风险放大的例子,这与全国性调查的大多数结果一致。