Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
J Trauma Stress. 2010 Dec;23(6):734-43. doi: 10.1002/jts.20576. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
The Critical Incident History Questionnaire indexes cumulative exposure to traumatic incidents in police by examining incident frequency and rated severity. In over 700 officers, event severity was negatively correlated (r(s) = -.61) with frequency of exposure. Cumulative exposure indices that varied emphasis on frequency and severity-using both nomothetic and idiographic methods-all showed satisfactory psychometric properties and similar correlates. All indices were only modestly related to posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Ratings of incident severity were not influenced by whether officers had ever experienced the incident. Because no index summarizing cumulative exposure to trauma had superior validity, our findings suggest that precision is not increased if frequency is weighted by severity.
《关键事件历史问卷》通过检查事件频率和评级严重程度,为警察记录累积的创伤性事件暴露情况。在 700 多名警察中,事件严重程度与暴露频率呈负相关(r(s)=-.61)。使用计量方法和个体方法的累积暴露指数均具有令人满意的心理测量特性和相似的相关性。所有指数与创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状仅有适度的相关性。事件严重程度的评定不受警察是否经历过该事件的影响。由于没有一个指数可以很好地总结创伤性事件的累积暴露情况,因此我们的研究结果表明,如果用严重程度加权频率,则不会提高精度。