• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Exposure to gun violence among the population of Chicago community violence interventionists.芝加哥社区暴力干预人员群体中的枪支暴力暴露。
Sci Adv. 2022 Dec 23;8(51):eabq7027. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abq7027.
2
The experience of secondary traumatic stress among community violence interventionists in Chicago.芝加哥社区暴力干预者的二次创伤压力体验。
Prev Med. 2022 Dec;165(Pt A):107186. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107186. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
3
Neighborhood Gun Violence and Birth Outcomes in Chicago.芝加哥的邻里枪支暴力与出生结局
Matern Child Health J. 2019 Sep;23(9):1251-1259. doi: 10.1007/s10995-019-02765-w.
4
How does gun violence affect Americans' trust in each other?枪支暴力如何影响美国人对彼此的信任?
Soc Sci Res. 2020 Sep;91:102449. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102449. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
5
Reducing gunshot victimization in high-risk social networks through direct and spillover effects.通过直接和溢出效应降低高危社交网络中的枪击受害率。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Nov;3(11):1164-1170. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0688-1. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
6
Post-Discharge Needs of Victims of Gun Violence in Chicago: A Qualitative Study.芝加哥枪支暴力受害者出院后的需求:一项定性研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Jan;34(1):135-155. doi: 10.1177/0886260516669545. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
7
Implementing Checklists to Improve Police Responses to Co-Victims of Gun Violence.实施清单制以改善警察对枪支暴力共同受害者的反应。
J Law Med Ethics. 2020 Dec;48(4_suppl):39-46. doi: 10.1177/1073110520979400.
8
An Academic-Community Partnership to Address Gun Violence in the Roseland Neighborhood of Chicago.学术-社区伙伴关系应对芝加哥罗塞兰社区的枪支暴力。
Fam Community Health. 2024;47(2):141-150. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0000000000000392.
9
Evaluating the impact of a street outreach intervention on participant involvement in gun violence.评估街头外展干预对参与者涉枪暴力参与的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Nov 14;120(46):e2300327120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2300327120. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
10
Street Culture and Gun Violence: Exploring the Reputation-Victimization Paradox.街头文化与枪支暴力:探索声誉-受害悖论。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jan;36(1-2):552-578. doi: 10.1177/0886260517730028. Epub 2017 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining CVI: A Critical Review of Current Conceptualizations and Their Implications for Policy, Research and Practice.定义慢性静脉疾病:对当前概念及其对政策、研究和实践的影响的批判性综述
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251366146. doi: 10.1177/00469580251366146. Epub 2025 Aug 14.
2
Burdens of interpersonal violence in adolescents and young adults.青少年和青年人际暴力的负担。
Pediatr Res. 2025 May 13. doi: 10.1038/s41390-025-04114-w.
3
Racial/Ethnic disparities in exposure to neighborhood violence and lung cancer risk in Chicago.在芝加哥,种族/民族差异与接触邻里暴力和肺癌风险。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Jan;340:116448. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116448. Epub 2023 Nov 26.
4
Resilience-Informed Community Violence Prevention and Community Organizing Strategies for Implementation: Protocol for a Hybrid Type 1 Implementation-Effectiveness Trial.基于恢复力的社区暴力预防与实施的社区组织策略:1型混合实施-效果试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 7;12:e50444. doi: 10.2196/50444.
5
Evaluating the impact of a street outreach intervention on participant involvement in gun violence.评估街头外展干预对参与者涉枪暴力参与的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Nov 14;120(46):e2300327120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2300327120. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
6
Gang intervention during COVID-19: A qualitative study of multidisciplinary teams and street outreach in Denver.新冠疫情期间的帮派干预:对丹佛多学科团队及街头外展服务的定性研究
J Crim Justice. 2023 Jan-Feb;84:102030. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2023.102030. Epub 2023 Jan 12.

本文引用的文献

1
The Co-Occurrence of Illegal Gun Carrying and Gun Violence Exposure: Evidence for Practitioners From Young People Adjudicated for Serious Involvement in Crime.非法携带枪支和枪支暴力暴露的共同发生:来自因严重犯罪而被判决的年轻人的证据。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Dec 1;190(12):2544-2551. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab188.
2
Using synthetic control methodology to estimate effects of a intervention in Baltimore, Maryland.采用合成控制法估计马里兰州巴尔的摩市干预措施的效果。
Inj Prev. 2022 Feb;28(1):61-67. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2020-044056. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
3
The impact of exposure to gun violence fatality on mental health outcomes in four urban U.S. settings.枪支暴力致死事件对四个美国城市环境下心理健康结果的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Feb;246:112587. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112587. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
4
Changes in patterns of mortality rates and years of life lost due to firearms in the United States, 1999 to 2016: A joinpoint analysis.1999 年至 2016 年美国因枪支导致的死亡率和生命损失年数变化趋势:联合分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 22;14(11):e0225223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225223. eCollection 2019.
5
Cross-sectional study of loss of life expectancy at different ages related to firearm deaths among black and white Americans.美国黑人和白人因枪支死亡导致不同年龄段预期寿命损失的横断面研究。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2019 Apr;24(2):55-58. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111103. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
6
Violence and Vigilance: The Acute Effects of Community Violent Crime on Sleep and Cortisol.暴力与警惕:社区暴力犯罪对睡眠和皮质醇的急性影响。
Child Dev. 2018 Jul;89(4):e323-e331. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12889. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
7
Cumulative exposure to work-related traumatic events and current post-traumatic stress disorder in New York City's first responders.纽约市急救人员与工作相关的创伤性事件的累积暴露及当前的创伤后应激障碍
Compr Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;74:134-143. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.12.003. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
8
Modeling Contagion Through Social Networks to Explain and Predict Gunshot Violence in Chicago, 2006 to 2014.通过社交网络建模传染病,以解释和预测 2006 年至 2014 年芝加哥的枪击暴力事件。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Mar 1;177(3):326-333. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8245.
9
Study retention as bias reduction in a hard-to-reach population.将研究保留率作为减少难以接触人群偏倚的方法。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 17;113(20):5477-85. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604138113. Epub 2016 May 9.
10
Cure violence: a public health model to reduce gun violence.治愈暴力:减少枪支暴力的公共卫生模型。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:39-53. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122509. Epub 2015 Jan 7.

芝加哥社区暴力干预人员群体中的枪支暴力暴露。

Exposure to gun violence among the population of Chicago community violence interventionists.

机构信息

School of Criminal Justice, University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY.

Chicago CRED (Creating Real Economic Destiny), Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Sci Adv. 2022 Dec 23;8(51):eabq7027. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abq7027.

DOI:10.1126/sciadv.abq7027
PMID:36563162
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9788757/
Abstract

Gun violence is a leading cause of premature death and a driver of racial disparities in life expectancy in the United States. Community-based interventions are the foremost policy strategy for reducing gun violence without exacerbating harm associated with criminal justice approaches. However, little is known about the interventionist workforce. In 2021, we used a researcher-guided survey to obtain a near-census of Chicago violence interventionists ( = 181, 93% response rate). Workers were mostly male (84%) and Black (80.9%), with a mean age of 43.6 years. Interventionists commonly experienced work-related exposure to violence and direct victimization. A total of 59.4% witnessed someone being shot at, whereas 32.4% witnessed a victim struck by gunfire. During work hours, 19.6% were shot at, while 2.2% were nonfatally shot. Single-year rates of gun violence victimization exceeded those of Chicago police. Results suggest that investment in community violence intervention should prioritize improving worker safety and reducing violence exposure while developing support for vulnerable frontline practitioners.

摘要

枪支暴力是导致美国过早死亡和预期寿命存在种族差异的主要原因。基于社区的干预措施是减少枪支暴力的首要政策策略,不会加剧刑事司法手段带来的伤害。然而,人们对干预人员的了解甚少。2021 年,我们使用研究人员指导的调查方法对芝加哥的暴力干预者进行了近乎普查(n=181,响应率为 93%)。工作人员大多为男性(84%)和黑人(80.9%),平均年龄为 43.6 岁。干预人员通常会在工作中接触到暴力和直接受害。共有 59.4%的人目睹过有人被枪击,而 32.4%的人目睹过受害者被枪击。在工作时间内,19.6%的人被枪击,而 2.2%的人没有被枪击致死。暴力受害者的单年发生率超过了芝加哥警方。结果表明,对社区暴力干预的投资应优先考虑提高工人的安全和减少暴力暴露,同时为脆弱的一线从业人员提供支持。