• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[关节镜下肩袖重建:修复技术的现状]

[Arthroscopic rotator cuff construction : Current state of refixation techniques].

作者信息

Nebelung W, Reichwein F

机构信息

Marienkrankenhaus Düsseldorf-Kaiserswerth, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.

出版信息

Orthopade. 2011 Jan;40(1):13-6, 18-20. doi: 10.1007/s00132-010-1674-5.

DOI:10.1007/s00132-010-1674-5
PMID:21174077
Abstract

The treatment of rotator cuff tears is affected by numerous factors. In addition to the patient's age, quality of blood supply, age and size of the tear and fatty infiltration, the refixation technique is important to ensure successful treatment. In recent years a trend towards arthroscopic operation techniques has been observed due to new developments in the field.The most important principles of arthroscopic refixation techniques currently used are presented. Special attention is paid to the type of suture, suture anchors and anchor arrangements used. Biomechanics and footprint coverage of double row constructions are superior to single row but clinical results do not show any clear advantages. If feasible, double row rotator cuff repair with lateral suture bridging seems to represent presently a useful technique with a superior rate of tendon healing.

摘要

肩袖撕裂的治疗受多种因素影响。除了患者的年龄、血供质量、撕裂的年龄和大小以及脂肪浸润外,固定技术对于确保治疗成功也很重要。近年来,由于该领域的新发展,出现了一种向关节镜手术技术发展的趋势。本文介绍了目前使用的关节镜固定技术的最重要原则。特别关注所使用的缝线类型、缝线锚钉和锚钉排列。双排结构的生物力学和足迹覆盖优于单排,但临床结果并未显示出明显优势。如果可行,外侧缝线桥接的双排肩袖修复目前似乎是一种有用的技术,肌腱愈合率更高。

相似文献

1
[Arthroscopic rotator cuff construction : Current state of refixation techniques].[关节镜下肩袖重建:修复技术的现状]
Orthopade. 2011 Jan;40(1):13-6, 18-20. doi: 10.1007/s00132-010-1674-5.
2
A laboratory comparison of a new arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair to a double row transosseous equivalent rotator cuff repair using suture anchors.一项使用缝线锚钉将新型关节镜下经骨肩袖修复术与双排经骨等效肩袖修复术进行的实验室对比研究。
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2013;71(2):128-31.
3
Clinical Outcomes of Modified Mason-Allen Single-Row Repair for Bursal-Sided Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: Comparison With the Double-Row Suture-Bridge Technique.改良梅森-艾伦单排修复术治疗滑囊侧部分厚度肩袖撕裂的临床结果:与双排缝线桥技术的比较
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1976-82. doi: 10.1177/0363546515587718. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
4
[Massive tears of rotator cuff - comparison of mini-open and arthroscopic techniques. Part 1. Mini-open technique].[肩袖巨大撕裂——小切口与关节镜技术的比较。第1部分。小切口技术]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2006 Dec;73(6):387-93.
5
Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row technique for repairing rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.关节镜下单排与双排技术修复肩袖撕裂:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2014 Nov;6(4):300-12. doi: 10.1111/os.12139.
6
Evaluation of footprint contact area and pressure using a triple-row modification of the suture-bridge technique for rotator cuff repair.采用三排缝线桥技术改良法评估肩袖修复的足印接触面积和压力。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Oct;21(10):1406-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.10.027. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
7
Evaluation of residual rotator cuff defects after in vivo single- versus double-row rotator cuff repairs.体内单排与双排肩袖修复术后残余肩袖缺损的评估
Arthroscopy. 2006 Oct;22(10):1070-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.05.007.
8
Does the literature support double-row suture anchor fixation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A systematic review comparing double-row and single-row suture anchor configuration.文献支持关节镜下肩袖修复的双排缝线锚钉固定吗?比较双排和单排缝线锚钉固定方式的系统评价。
Arthroscopy. 2009 Nov;25(11):1319-28. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.02.005. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
9
"Transosseous-equivalent" rotator cuff repair technique.“经骨等效”肩袖修复技术
Arthroscopy. 2006 Dec;22(12):1360.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.07.017.
10
Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: double-row versus suture-bridge technique.关节镜下肩袖修复后修复完整性和功能结果:双排与缝线桥技术。
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):294-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546511425657. Epub 2011 Nov 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Single versus double-row repair of the rotator cuff: does double-row repair with improved anatomical and biomechanical characteristics lead to better clinical outcome?单排与双排修复肩袖:双排修复具有改善的解剖学和生物力学特性是否会带来更好的临床结果?
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Dec;18(12):1718-29. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1245-7. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
2
Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs over time.经关节镜的肩袖修复术后随时间的生物力学评估。
Arthroscopy. 2010 May;26(5):592-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.02.009.
3
Which method of rotator cuff repair leads to the highest rate of structural healing? A systematic review.
哪种肩袖修复方法的结构愈合率最高?系统评价。
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Apr;38(4):835-41. doi: 10.1177/0363546509359679.
4
Does the literature support double-row suture anchor fixation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A systematic review comparing double-row and single-row suture anchor configuration.文献支持关节镜下肩袖修复的双排缝线锚钉固定吗?比较双排和单排缝线锚钉固定方式的系统评价。
Arthroscopy. 2009 Nov;25(11):1319-28. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.02.005. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
5
A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing arthroscopic single- and double-row rotator cuff repair: magnetic resonance imaging and early clinical evaluation.一项比较关节镜下单排和双排肩袖修复术的前瞻性随机临床试验:磁共振成像及早期临床评估
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Apr;37(4):674-82. doi: 10.1177/0363546508328115. Epub 2009 Feb 9.
6
A novel transosseous button technique for rotator cuff repair.一种用于肩袖修复的新型经骨纽扣技术。
Arthroscopy. 2008 Sep;24(9):1074-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.02.014. Epub 2008 Apr 21.
7
Suture anchor materials, eyelets, and designs: update 2008.缝线锚钉材料、小孔及设计:2008年更新
Arthroscopy. 2008 Aug;24(8):859-67. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.03.006. Epub 2008 May 9.
8
The effect of dynamic external rotation comparing 2 footprint-restoring rotator cuff repair techniques.比较两种恢复足迹的肩袖修复技术时动态外旋的效果。
Am J Sports Med. 2008 May;36(5):893-900. doi: 10.1177/0363546507313092. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
9
Biomechanical evaluation of rotator cuff repairs in a sheep model: suture anchors using arthroscopic Mason-Allen stitches compared with transosseous sutures using traditional modified Mason-Allen stitches.绵羊模型中肩袖修复的生物力学评估:使用关节镜下梅森-艾伦缝合法的缝合锚钉与使用传统改良梅森-艾伦缝合法的经骨缝线的比较。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2008 Mar;23(3):291-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.10.010. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
10
Equivalent clinical results of arthroscopic single-row and double-row suture anchor repair for rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial.关节镜下单排与双排缝线锚钉修复肩袖撕裂的等效临床结果:一项随机对照试验
Am J Sports Med. 2007 Aug;35(8):1254-60. doi: 10.1177/0363546507302218. Epub 2007 Jun 6.