• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结肠癌切除术后淋巴结评估的变化:患者、外科医生、病理学家还是医院?

Variation in lymph node assessment after colon cancer resection: patient, surgeon, pathologist, or hospital?

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Mar;15(3):471-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1410-9. Epub 2010 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1007/s11605-010-1410-9
PMID:21174232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3568530/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of ≥ 12 lymph nodes after colon cancer resection has been adopted as a hospital quality measure, but compliance varies considerably. We sought to quantify relative proportions of the variation in lymph node assessment after colon cancer resection occurring at the patient, surgeon, pathologist, and hospital levels.

METHODS

The 1998-2005 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database was used to identify 27,101 patients aged 65 years and older with Medicare parts A and B coverage undergoing colon cancer resection. Multilevel logistic regression was used to model lymph node evaluation as a binary variable (≥ 12 versus <12) while explicitly accounting for clustering of outcomes.

RESULTS

Patients were treated by 4,180 distinct surgeons and 2,656 distinct pathologists at 1,113 distinct hospitals. The overall rate of 12-lymph node (12-LN) evaluation was 48%, with a median of 11 nodes examined per patient, and 33% demonstrated lymph node metastasis on pathological examination. Demographic and tumor-related characteristics such as age, gender, tumor grade, and location each demonstrated significant effects on rate of 12-LN assessment (all P < 0.05). The majority of the variation in 12-LN assessment was related to non-modifiable patient-specific factors (79%). After accounting for all explanatory variables in the full model, 8.2% of the residual provider-level variation was attributable to the surgeon, 19% to the pathologist, and 73% to the hospital.

CONCLUSION

Compliance with the 12-LN standard is poor. Variation between hospitals is larger than that between pathologists or surgeons. However, patient-to-patient variation is the largest determinant of 12-LN evaluation.

摘要

背景

结肠癌切除术后评估≥12 个淋巴结已被采纳为医院质量指标,但符合率差异很大。我们旨在量化结肠癌切除术后淋巴结评估的变化在患者、外科医生、病理学家和医院水平上的相对比例。

方法

使用 1998-2005 年监测、流行病学和最终结果-医疗保险数据库,确定了 27,101 名年龄在 65 岁及以上、有医疗保险 A 部分和 B 部分覆盖的患者,他们接受了结肠癌切除术。多水平逻辑回归用于对淋巴结评估作为二元变量(≥12 与<12)进行建模,同时明确考虑了结果的聚类。

结果

患者由 4,180 名不同的外科医生和 2,656 名不同的病理学家在 1,113 家不同的医院进行治疗。12 个淋巴结(12-LN)评估的总体率为 48%,中位数为每位患者检查 11 个淋巴结,33%的患者在病理检查中显示淋巴结转移。年龄、性别、肿瘤分级和肿瘤位置等人口统计学和肿瘤相关特征均对 12-LN 评估率有显著影响(均 P<0.05)。12-LN 评估的大部分差异与不可改变的患者特定因素有关(79%)。在全模型中考虑所有解释变量后,外科医生的 8.2%、病理学家的 19%和医院的 73%的剩余提供者水平差异归因于该因素。

结论

12-LN 标准的依从性很差。医院之间的差异大于病理学家或外科医生之间的差异。然而,患者之间的差异是 12-LN 评估的最大决定因素。

相似文献

1
Variation in lymph node assessment after colon cancer resection: patient, surgeon, pathologist, or hospital?结肠癌切除术后淋巴结评估的变化:患者、外科医生、病理学家还是医院?
J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Mar;15(3):471-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1410-9. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
2
Surgeon-, pathologist-, and hospital-level variation in suboptimal lymph node examination after colectomy: Compartmentalizing quality improvement strategies.结肠切除术后次优淋巴结检查在外科医生、病理学家和医院层面的差异:划分质量改进策略。
Surgery. 2017 May;161(5):1299-1306. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.029. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
3
Lymph node evaluation as a colon cancer quality measure: a national hospital report card.作为结肠癌质量指标的淋巴结评估:一份全国医院报告卡
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Sep 17;100(18):1310-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn293. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
4
Hospital lymph node examination rates and survival after resection for colon cancer.医院对结肠癌切除术后的淋巴结检查率及生存率
JAMA. 2007 Nov 14;298(18):2149-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.18.2149.
5
Lymph node evaluation as a colon cancer quality measure.作为结肠癌质量指标的淋巴结评估
CA Cancer J Clin. 2009 Jan-Feb;59(1):2-4. doi: 10.3322/caac.20012.
6
Lymph Node Yield in Colon Cancer: Individuals Can Make the Difference.结肠癌的淋巴结获取量:个体因素至关重要。
Dig Surg. 2015;32(4):269-74. doi: 10.1159/000381863. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
7
Impact of patient, hospital, and operative characteristics relative to social determinants of health: Compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for colon cancer.患者、医院和手术特征对健康社会决定因素的影响:遵守国家综合癌症网络结肠癌指南的情况。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Sep;28(9):1463-1471. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.06.010. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
8
Quality of care along the cancer continuum: does receiving adequate lymph node evaluation for colon cancer lead to comprehensive postsurgical care?癌症连续护理质量:接受充分的结肠癌淋巴结评估是否会导致全面的术后护理?
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Sep;215(3):400-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.05.014. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
9
Factors affecting lymph node yield from patients undergoing colectomy for cancer.影响结肠癌患者淋巴结检出数量的因素。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 Sep;26(9):1163-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-011-1240-6. Epub 2011 May 15.
10
Prognostic accuracy of different lymph node staging system in predicting overall survival in stage IV colon cancer.不同淋巴结分期系统在预测 IV 期结肠癌总生存中的预后准确性。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Feb;35(2):317-322. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03486-w. Epub 2019 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Lymph node harvest as a predictor of survival for colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.淋巴结清扫作为结肠癌生存的预测指标:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
Surg Pract Sci. 2023 Jun 15;14:100190. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100190. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Disparities in Access, Quality, and Clinical Outcome for Latino Californians With Colon Cancer.加利福尼亚州拉丁裔结肠癌患者在医疗服务可及性、医疗质量和临床结局方面的差异。
Ann Surg. 2025 Mar 1;281(3):469-475. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006251. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
3
Prognostic Value of Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio and Identification of Factors Influencing the Lymph Node Yield in Patients Undergoing Curative Colon Cancer Resection.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2010.癌症统计数据,2010 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):277-300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
2
Should total number of lymph nodes be used as a quality of care measure for stage III colon cancer?淋巴结总数应作为III期结肠癌护理质量的衡量指标吗?
Ann Surg. 2009 Apr;249(4):559-63. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318197f2c8.
3
Clinically important aspects of lymph node assessment in colon cancer.结肠癌中淋巴结评估的临床重要方面。
根治性结肠癌切除患者中转移淋巴结比率的预后价值及影响淋巴结获取量的因素分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 2;16(1):218. doi: 10.3390/cancers16010218.
4
Immune microenvironment and lymph node yield in colorectal cancer.结直肠癌的免疫微环境与淋巴结检出数。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Oct;129(6):917-924. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02372-1. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
5
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of methylene blue to improve the lymph node harvest in rectal cancer surgery.一项关于使用亚甲蓝改善直肠癌手术中淋巴结清扫的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 May;27(5):361-371. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02779-1. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
6
Associations of acute medical care with the transfer and acceptance functions of hospitals in a region in Japan with limited medical resources.日本某医疗资源有限地区的急性医疗与医院转介和接收功能的关联。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 23;18(1):e0280802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280802. eCollection 2023.
7
Exploration of a modified stage for pN0 colon cancer patients.探讨 pN0 期结肠癌患者的改良分期。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 25;12(1):5214. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09228-3.
8
Influence of colonic mesenteric area on the number of lymph node retrieval for colon cancer: a prospective cohort study.结肠系膜面积对结肠癌淋巴结清扫数量的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Ann Coloproctol. 2023 Feb;39(1):77-84. doi: 10.3393/ac.2021.00444.0063. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
9
Readiness of Graduating General Surgery Residents to Perform Colorectal Procedures.普通外科住院医师施行结直肠手术的准备情况。
J Surg Educ. 2021 Jul-Aug;78(4):1127-1135. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.12.015. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
10
Robotic Complete Mesocolic Excision with Central Vascular Ligation for Right Colon Cancer: Surgical Technique and Short-term Outcomes.机器人辅助右半结肠癌全结肠系膜切除术并中央血管结扎:手术技术与短期疗效
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;11(4):674-683. doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01181-9. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
J Surg Oncol. 2009 Mar 15;99(4):248-55. doi: 10.1002/jso.21226.
4
Evidence for cure by adjuvant therapy in colon cancer: observations based on individual patient data from 20,898 patients on 18 randomized trials.结肠癌辅助治疗治愈的证据:基于18项随机试验中20898例患者个体数据的观察结果
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 20;27(6):872-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.5362. Epub 2009 Jan 5.
5
Is lymph node count an ideal quality indicator for cancer care?淋巴结计数是癌症护理的理想质量指标吗?
J Surg Oncol. 2009 Mar 15;99(4):265-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.21197.
6
Lymph node evaluation as a colon cancer quality measure: a national hospital report card.作为结肠癌质量指标的淋巴结评估:一份全国医院报告卡
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Sep 17;100(18):1310-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn293. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
7
Adequacy and importance of lymph node evaluation for colon cancer in the elderly.老年结肠癌患者淋巴结评估的充分性及重要性
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Feb;206(2):247-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.07.044. Epub 2007 Oct 29.
8
Nodal harvest: surgeon or pathologist?淋巴结清扫:外科医生还是病理学家?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Mar;51(3):366-7; author reply 368. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9113-3. Epub 2007 Dec 18.
9
Hospital lymph node examination rates and survival after resection for colon cancer.医院对结肠癌切除术后的淋巴结检查率及生存率
JAMA. 2007 Nov 14;298(18):2149-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.18.2149.
10
Limitations of claims and registry data in surgical oncology research.外科肿瘤学研究中索赔数据和登记数据的局限性。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Feb;15(2):415-23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9658-3. Epub 2007 Nov 7.