Suppr超能文献

一项随机可行性/II 期研究(SBG 2004-1),采用密集剂量/个体化表阿霉素、环磷酰胺(EC)序贯多西他赛(T)或固定剂量密集剂量 EC/T 与 T、多柔比星和环磷酰胺(TAC)治疗淋巴结阳性乳腺癌。

A randomised feasibility/phase II study (SBG 2004-1) with dose-dense/tailored epirubicin, cyclophoshamide (EC) followed by docetaxel (T) or fixed dosed dose-dense EC/T versus T, doxorubicin and C (TAC) in node-positive breast cancer.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Karolinska Institute and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Oncol. 2011 Jan;50(1):35-41. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2010.535847.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of tailored and dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel as adjuvant breast cancer therapy. Material and methods. Patients with node-positive breast cancer received either four cycles of biweekly and tailored EC (epirubicin 38-60-75-90-105-120 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 450-600-900-1200 mg/m(2)) followed by four cycles of docetaxel (60-75-85-100 mg/m(2)) (arm A) or the same regimen with fixed doses (E(90)C(600) + 4 → T(75) + 4) (arm B) or docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (T(75)A(50)C(500)) every three weeks for six cycles (arm C). All patients received G-CSF support and prophylactic ciprofloxacin. Results. One-hundred and twenty-four patients were randomised in the study. In the A, B and C arm, 17% 19% and 3% of the patients had one or more cycles delayed due to side-effects whereas 24%, 5% and 15% experienced a grade 3 infection or febrile neutropenia. After the introduction of an extra week between the EC and T parts in the A and B arms, grade 3 hand-foot-skin reactions were reduced from 5 to 0.2%. Twenty-nine percent (A and B) and 20% (C) of the patients were hospitalised due to side-effects. Discussion. Dose-dense and tailored EC/T can be given with manageable toxicity and is after adjustment presently studied in the phase III Panther trial.

摘要

研究目的是评估个体化和密集剂量表柔比星和环磷酰胺序贯多西他赛作为辅助乳腺癌治疗的可行性。

材料和方法。淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者接受 4 周期的每 2 周个体化和密集 EC(表柔比星 38-60-75-90-105-120mg/m²,环磷酰胺 450-600-900-1200mg/m²),随后接受 4 周期多西他赛(60-75-85-100mg/m²)(A 组),或相同方案固定剂量(E(90)C(600)+4→T(75)+4)(B 组),或多西他赛、阿霉素和环磷酰胺(T(75)A(50)C(500))每 3 周 6 周期(C 组)。所有患者均接受 G-CSF 支持和预防性环丙沙星治疗。

结果。该研究共纳入 124 例患者。在 A、B 和 C 组中,17%、19%和 3%的患者因不良反应而延迟 1 个或多个周期,24%、5%和 15%发生 3 级感染或发热性中性粒细胞减少症。在 A 和 B 组中,EC 和 T 部分之间增加 1 周后,3 级手足皮肤反应从 5%降至 0.2%。29%(A 和 B)和 20%(C)的患者因不良反应住院。

讨论。密集剂量和个体化 EC/T 可在可管理的毒性下使用,目前正在 Panther 三期试验中进行调整研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验