Liu Pin-ming, Zheng Hai-sheng, Luo Nian-sang, Li Guo-zhao, Wang Jing-feng
Department of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2010 Oct;38(10):909-13.
To assess the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (64-SCTCA) in individuals with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).
The study enrolled 285 individuals undergoing 64-SCTCA with calcium scoring and thereafter invasive coronary angiography (CAG) within 4 weeks for suspected CAD. Pretest probability of having obstructive CAD was determined using the Duke clinical score, which was estimated by type of chest discomfort, age, gender, and traditional risk factors and stratified into 3 levels of probability: low (≤ 30%, n = 80), intermediate (31% to 70%, n = 92), and high (≥ 71%, n = 113). CAD was defined as the presence of at least one vessel of ≥ 50% coronary stenosis on CAG.
The patient-based diagnostic accuracy of 64-SCTCA for detecting CAD according to CAG revealed a sensitivity of 81.2%, a specificity of 93.3%, a positive predictive value of 68.0% and negative predictive value of 96.6%. The CAD prevalence in the low, intermediate and high risk groups according to Duke probability was 46.3%, 72.8% and 82.3%, respectively. The sensitivity and positive predictive value were lower in the low probability group than those in the intermediate and high probability groups. For those with coronary artery Agatston calcium score > 400, the diagnostic accuracy was linked with a higher sensitivity but lower specificity. The diagnostic value of 64-SCTCA for proximal and mid-segment of coronary artery was superior to that for distal segment.
64-SCTCA is mainly indicated in individuals with an intermediate probability of having CAD. The diagnostic value of 64-SCTCA could be affected by coronary artery calcium, lesion location and vessel diameter.
评估64层螺旋CT冠状动脉造影(64-SCTCA)对疑似冠心病(CAD)患者的诊断准确性。
本研究纳入了285例因疑似CAD接受64-SCTCA及钙化积分检查,并在4周内接受有创冠状动脉造影(CAG)的患者。使用杜克临床评分确定存在阻塞性CAD的预检概率,该评分由胸痛类型、年龄、性别和传统危险因素估算得出,并分为3个概率水平:低(≤30%,n = 80)、中(31%至70%,n = 92)和高(≥71%,n = 113)。CAD定义为CAG显示至少一支血管存在≥50%的冠状动脉狭窄。
基于患者的64-SCTCA检测CAD的诊断准确性显示,敏感性为81.2%,特异性为93.3%,阳性预测值为68.0%,阴性预测值为96.6%。根据杜克概率,低、中、高风险组的CAD患病率分别为46.3%、72.8%和82.3%。低概率组的敏感性和阳性预测值低于中、高概率组。对于冠状动脉阿加斯顿钙化积分>400的患者,诊断准确性与较高的敏感性但较低的特异性相关。64-SCTCA对冠状动脉近端和中段的诊断价值优于远端。
64-SCTCA主要适用于CAD可能性为中等的患者。64-SCTCA的诊断价值可能受冠状动脉钙化、病变位置和血管直径的影响。