Division of Infectious Diseases, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Am J Infect Control. 2011 Mar;39(2):135-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.03.022. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
Although hospital-acquired infections presumably may have a poorer prognosis than community-onset infections because of unanticipated antimicrobial resistance, little data are available on the clinical and microbiological characteristics of hospital-acquired versus community-onset urinary tract-related bacteremia cases.
Data were collected from a nationwide database of surveillance for bacteremia. Data from patients with hospital-acquired urinary tract-related bacteremia were compared with those with community-onset bacteremia.
Of 398 patients with urinary tract-related bacteremia, 71 (17.8%) had hospital-acquired infection, and the remaining 327 (82.2%) had community-onset infection. Although Escherichia coli was the most common isolate identified, pathogens other than E coli were more frequently isolated in hospital-acquired infections than in community-onset infections (46.5% vs 19.3%). Among E coli isolates causing hospital-acquired infections, 26.3% (10 of 38) were resistant to extended-spectrum cephalosporins (ESCs), whereas among E coli isolates causing community-onset infections, only 6.1% (16 of 264) were ESC-resistant. Hospital-acquired infection had a significantly higher mortality rate than community-onset infection (21.1% [15 of 71] vs 8.3% [27 of 327]; P = .004). Multivariate analysis identified nosocomial acquisition as a significant independent risk factor for mortality, along with severe sepsis, underlying solid tumor, ESC resistance, and high Pitt bacteremia score (all P < .05).
Hospital-acquired urinary tract-related bacteremia has a poorer prognosis than community-onset bacteremia. The ESC-resistant nature of gram-negative bacilli, which may be more common in nosocomial isolates than in community isolates, adversely affects the outcome of urinary tract-related bacteremia.
由于预料之外的抗生素耐药性,医院获得性感染的预后可能比社区获得性感染差,但关于医院获得性与社区获得性尿路感染相关菌血症病例的临床和微生物学特征的数据很少。
从全国性的菌血症监测数据库中收集数据。将医院获得性尿路感染相关菌血症患者的数据与社区获得性菌血症患者的数据进行比较。
在 398 例尿路感染相关菌血症患者中,71 例(17.8%)为医院获得性感染,其余 327 例(82.2%)为社区获得性感染。虽然大肠杆菌是最常见的分离菌,但医院获得性感染中分离出的病原体除大肠杆菌外的比例高于社区获得性感染(46.5%比 19.3%)。在引起医院获得性感染的大肠杆菌分离株中,26.3%(38 株中的 10 株)对第三代头孢菌素耐药,而在引起社区获得性感染的大肠杆菌分离株中,只有 6.1%(264 株中的 16 株)对第三代头孢菌素耐药。医院获得性感染的死亡率明显高于社区获得性感染(21.1%[71 例中的 15 例]比 8.3%[327 例中的 27 例];P=0.004)。多变量分析确定医院获得性感染是死亡率的一个显著独立危险因素,此外还有严重脓毒症、基础实体瘤、第三代头孢菌素耐药和高 Pitt 菌血症评分(均 P<0.05)。
医院获得性尿路感染相关菌血症的预后比社区获得性菌血症差。革兰氏阴性杆菌的第三代头孢菌素耐药性,可能比社区分离株更常见于医院分离株,这对尿路感染相关菌血症的结果产生不利影响。