Department of Nutrition, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2010 Dec 13;5(12):e15208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015208.
With the current rise in obesity-related morbidities, real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) has become a widely used method for assessment of genes expressed and regulated by adipocytes. In order to measure accurate changes in relative gene expression and monitor intersample variability, normalization to endogenous control genes that do not change in relative expression is commonly used with qRT-PCR determinations. However, historical evidence has clearly demonstrated that the expression profiles of traditional control genes (e.g., β-actin, GAPDH, α-tubulin) are differentially regulated across multiple tissue types and experimental conditions.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Therefore, we validated six commonly used endogenous control genes under diverse experimental conditions of inflammatory stress, oxidative stress, synchronous cell cycle progression and cellular differentiation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes using TaqMan qRT-PCR. Under each study condition, we further evaluated the impact of reference gene selection on experimental outcome using examples of target genes relevant to adipocyte function and differentiation. We demonstrate that multiple reference genes are regulated in a condition-specific manner that is not suitable for use in target gene normalization.
CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Data are presented demonstrating that inappropriate reference gene selection can have profound influence on study conclusions ranging from divergent statistical outcome to inaccurate data interpretation of significant magnitude. This study validated the use of endogenous controls in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and highlights the impact of inappropriate reference gene selection on data interpretation and study conclusions.
随着肥胖相关发病率的上升,实时定量逆转录聚合酶链反应(qRT-PCR)已成为评估脂肪细胞表达和调节基因的常用方法。为了测量相对基因表达的准确变化并监测样本间的变异性,通常使用 qRT-PCR 测定法将内源性对照基因(其相对表达不变)进行归一化,以进行准确的测量。然而,历史证据清楚地表明,传统对照基因(例如β-肌动蛋白、GAPDH、α-微管蛋白)的表达谱在多种组织类型和实验条件下存在差异调节。
方法/主要发现:因此,我们使用 TaqMan qRT-PCR 在 3T3-L1 脂肪细胞的炎症应激、氧化应激、同步细胞周期进展和细胞分化等多种实验条件下验证了六种常用的内源性对照基因。在每种研究条件下,我们进一步通过与脂肪细胞功能和分化相关的靶基因的示例评估了参考基因选择对实验结果的影响。我们证明了多个参考基因以特定于条件的方式进行调节,不适合用于靶基因归一化。
结论/意义:本研究提供了数据,证明了不合适的参考基因选择会对研究结论产生深远影响,从不同的统计结果到对显著程度的不准确数据解释不等。这项研究验证了内源性对照在 3T3-L1 脂肪细胞中的使用,并强调了不适当的参考基因选择对数据解释和研究结论的影响。