Department of Orthodontics, Vale do Rio Verde University, Três Coracpes, MG, Brazil.
Braz Oral Res. 2010 Oct-Dec;24(4):433-7. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242010000400010.
The aim of the present study was to compare the use of three cervical vertebral evaluation methods (Hassel-Farman, Baccetti et al., and Seedat-Forsberg) for determinating skeletal maturation stage in orthodontic patients. Twenty-three radiographs were randomly selected from a private orthodontic practice. Each radiograph was analyzed on three separate occasions by four evaluators (one radiologist and three orthodontists), who determined the skeletal maturation stage using the references established by each of the three methods. Intraevaluator and interevaluator comparisons were performed, and the degree of agreement was established using the weighted Kappa coefficient (95% CI). Good agreement (Kappa between 0.61 and 0.80) was observed between the determinations of most of the evaluators. The three methods demonstrated clinical applicability. However, the method proposed by Baccetti et al. achieved the best results, followed by the Hassel-Farman and the Seedat-Forsberg methods.
本研究旨在比较三种颈椎评估方法(Hassel-Farman、Baccetti 等和 Seedat-Forsberg)在确定正畸患者骨骼成熟阶段中的应用。从一家私人正畸诊所中随机抽取 23 张 X 光片。每个 X 光片由四位评估者(一位放射科医生和三位正畸医生)分别在三个不同的时间进行分析,他们使用三种方法中的每一种建立的参考标准来确定骨骼成熟阶段。对评估者内和评估者间的比较进行了分析,并使用加权 Kappa 系数(95%置信区间)来确定一致性程度。大多数评估者的测定结果之间观察到良好的一致性(Kappa 在 0.61 到 0.80 之间)。三种方法均具有临床适用性。然而,Baccetti 等提出的方法取得了最佳结果,其次是 Hassel-Farman 和 Seedat-Forsberg 方法。