Boufi Mourad, Bordon Sébastien, Dona Bianca, Hartung Olivier, Sarran Anthony, Nadeau Sébastien, Maurin Charlotte, Alimi Yves S
Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Nord, Chemin des Bourrelly, Marseille Cedex 20, France.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2011 Apr;25(3):352-8. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.09.008. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
In hemodynamically unstable patients, the management of retroperitoneal vascular trauma is both difficult and challenging. Endovascular techniques have become an alternative to surgery in several trauma centers.
Between 2004 and 2006, 16 patients (nine men, mean age: 46 years, range: 19-79 years) with retroperitoneal vascular trauma and hemodynamic instability were treated using an endovascular approach. The mean injury severity score was 30.7 ± 13.1. Mean systolic blood pressure and the shock index were 74 mm Hg and 1.9, respectively. Vasopressor drugs were required in 68.7% of cases (n = 11). Injuries were attributable to road traffic accidents (n = 15) and falls (n = 1). The hemorrhage sites included the internal iliac artery or its branches (n = 12) with bilateral injury in one case, renal artery (n = 2), abdominal aorta (n = 1), and lumbar artery (n = 1).
In all, 14 coil embolizations and three stent-grafts were implanted. The technical success rate was 75%, as early re-embolization was necessary in one case and three patients died during the perioperative period. Six patients died during the period of hospitalization (37.5%). No surgical conversion or major morbidity was reported.
In comparison with particulates, coil ± stent-graft may provide similar efficacy with regard to survival, and thus may be a valuable solution when particulate embolization is not available or feasible.
在血流动力学不稳定的患者中,腹膜后血管创伤的处理既困难又具有挑战性。在一些创伤中心,血管内技术已成为手术的替代方法。
2004年至2006年期间,对16例(9例男性,平均年龄46岁,范围19 - 79岁)患有腹膜后血管创伤且血流动力学不稳定的患者采用血管内方法进行治疗。平均损伤严重程度评分为30.7±13.1。平均收缩压和休克指数分别为74 mmHg和1.9。68.7%的病例(n = 11)需要使用血管加压药物。损伤原因包括道路交通事故(n = 15)和跌倒(n = 1)。出血部位包括髂内动脉或其分支(n = 12),其中1例为双侧损伤,肾动脉(n = 2),腹主动脉(n = 1)和腰动脉(n = 1)。
总共进行了14次弹簧圈栓塞和3次支架植入。技术成功率为75%,因为1例需要早期再次栓塞,3例患者在围手术期死亡。6例患者在住院期间死亡(37.5%)。未报告手术中转或重大并发症。
与微粒相比,弹簧圈±支架在生存方面可能具有相似的疗效,因此当微粒栓塞不可用或不可行时,可能是一种有价值的解决方案。