• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科患者的就诊情况。

Access to care among emergency department patients.

机构信息

University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2012 Jan;29(1):28-31. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.103077. Epub 2010 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1136/emj.2010.103077
PMID:21183527
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The number of annual patient visits to US emergency departments (ED) has been increasing since 1995, whereas the number of ED is decreasing. Previous studies have identified many reasons why patients seek care in ED, including lack of access to care elsewhere, lack of insurance, inability to see their doctor in a timely manner and lower levels of social support. This study identifies factors that influence patients' decisions to seek care in ED and assesses their access to primary care.

METHODS

A prospective study, conducted by standardised verbal interview with adult ED patients, was performed in the XXX ED during June-July 2009. Non-English speaking patients, the mentally incapacitated and those under severe distress were excluded. Consenting patients were asked a series of questions on access to primary care, factors that influenced their decision to attend the ED, health insurance status and demographic information.

RESULTS

Among 292 study participants (89% response rate), the majority were over 40 years (52%), Caucasian (69%) and unemployed (58%). Among employed participants, 66% (N=88/133) of employers offered health insurance. Most participants had a primary care physician (PCP; 73%; N=214), but a minority had called their PCP about the current problem (31%; N=78/253). Most participants came to the ED because of convenience/location (41%) or preference for this institution (23%). Participants came to the ED, rather than their regular doctor, because they had no PCP (27%), an emergency condition (19%), or communication challenges (17%).

CONCLUSION

Convenience, location, institutional preference and access to other physicians are common factors that influence patients' decisions to seek care in ED.

摘要

目的

自 1995 年以来,美国急诊部(ED)的年就诊患者人数一直在增加,而 ED 的数量却在减少。先前的研究已经确定了患者为何选择在 ED 就诊的许多原因,包括无法在其他地方获得医疗服务、缺乏保险、无法及时看医生以及社会支持水平较低。本研究确定了影响患者选择在 ED 就诊的因素,并评估了他们获得初级保健的情况。

方法

2009 年 6 月至 7 月,在 XXX ED 通过标准口头访谈对成年 ED 患者进行了前瞻性研究。排除不会说英语、精神障碍和处于严重痛苦中的患者。同意参与研究的患者被问及一系列有关获得初级保健、影响他们选择去 ED 的因素、健康保险状况和人口统计学信息的问题。

结果

在 292 名研究参与者中(89%的应答率),大多数人年龄在 40 岁以上(52%),白种人(69%)和失业(58%)。在有雇主的参与者中,66%(88/133)的雇主提供健康保险。大多数参与者有初级保健医生(PCP;73%;N=214),但只有少数人因当前问题致电 PCP(31%;N=78/253)。大多数参与者选择来 ED 是因为方便/位置(41%)或对该机构的偏好(23%)。参与者选择来 ED 而不是他们的常规医生,是因为他们没有 PCP(27%)、紧急情况(19%)或沟通障碍(17%)。

结论

便利性、位置、机构偏好以及获得其他医生的机会是影响患者选择在 ED 就诊的常见因素。

相似文献

1
Access to care among emergency department patients.急诊科患者的就诊情况。
Emerg Med J. 2012 Jan;29(1):28-31. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.103077. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
2
Reasons for using the emergency department: results of the EMPATH Study.使用急诊科的原因:共情研究结果
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Dec;12(12):1158-66. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.030. Epub 2005 Nov 10.
3
Practical barriers to timely primary care access: impact on adult use of emergency department services.及时获得初级保健服务的实际障碍:对成年人使用急诊科服务的影响。
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Aug 11;168(15):1705-10. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.15.1705.
4
Emergency department visits and primary care among adults with chronic conditions.急诊就诊和慢性病成年人的初级保健。
Med Care. 2010 Nov;48(11):972-80. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181eaf86d.
5
Ultrasonography in community emergency departments in the United States: access to ultrasonography performed by consultants and status of emergency physician-performed ultrasonography.美国社区急诊科的超声检查:由会诊医生进行超声检查的情况及急诊医生实施超声检查的现状
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Feb;47(2):147-53. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.08.023. Epub 2005 Nov 21.
6
Factors associated with self-reported pain scores among ED patients.与 ED 患者自我报告疼痛评分相关的因素。
Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Feb;30(2):331-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.12.015. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
7
Factors associated with walkout of patients from New South Wales hospital emergency departments, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州医院急诊科患者擅自离开的相关因素。
Emerg Med Australas. 2005 Oct-Dec;17(5-6):434-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00774.x.
8
Nonurgent emergency department patient characteristics and barriers to primary care.非紧急情况的急诊科患者特征及初级保健的障碍
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Dec;11(12):1302-10. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.032.
9
Community characteristics affecting emergency department use by Medicaid enrollees.影响医疗补助计划参保者急诊科就诊情况的社区特征
Med Care. 2009 Jan;47(1):15-22. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181844e1c.
10
Characteristics that distinguish adolescents who present to a children's hospital emergency department from those presenting to a general emergency department.区分前往儿童医院急诊科的青少年与前往综合急诊科的青少年的特征。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009 Jun;25(6):376-9. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181a7924f.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency department-initiated oral naltrexone for patients with moderate to severe alcohol use disorder: A pilot feasibility study.急诊科为中重度酒精使用障碍患者启动口服纳曲酮治疗:一项试点可行性研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 May;32(5):488-497. doi: 10.1111/acem.15059. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
2
Medicaid Expansion and Preventable Emergency Department Use by Race/Ethnicity.医疗补助计划扩大对不同种族/族裔急诊使用的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2024 Jun;66(6):989-998. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.02.002. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
3
What Brings You in Today? Sex, Race, Substance Type, and Other Sociodemographic and Health-Related Characteristics Predict if Substance Use is the Main Reason for a Clinical Encounter.
今天是什么原因让你来看病?性别、种族、物质类型以及其他社会人口学和健康相关特征可预测物质使用是否是临床就诊的主要原因。
Yale J Biol Med. 2023 Sep 29;96(3):277-291. doi: 10.59249/UDRG5942. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Motives behind low-acuity geriatric emergency medicine attenders: a picture from free healthcare system.低 acuity 老年急诊就诊者的就诊动机:免费医疗体系下的一幅图景。
Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Dec;192(6):3091-3099. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03359-w. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
5
An integrative review of adult patient-reported reasons for non-urgent use of the emergency department.对成年患者报告的非紧急使用急诊科原因的综合综述。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Mar 30;22(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01251-7.
6
Out-of-Hospital COVID-19 Deaths: Consequences for Quality of Medical Care and Accuracy of Cause of Death Coding.院外 COVID-19 死亡病例:对医疗质量和死因编码准确性的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Jul;111(S2):S101-S106. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306428.
7
Examining the Association between Community-Level Marginalization and Emergency Room Wait Time in Ontario, Canada.考察加拿大安大略省社区边缘化程度与急诊室候诊时间之间的关系。
Healthc Policy. 2020 May;15(4):64-76. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2020.26223.
8
Predictors of Overdose Death Among High-Risk Emergency Department Patients With Substance-Related Encounters: A Data Linkage Cohort Study.高风险急诊科物质相关就诊患者药物过量死亡的预测因素:一项数据链接队列研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Jan;75(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.07.014. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
9
Why do patients seek primary medical care in emergency departments? An ethnographic exploration of access to general practice.为何患者在急诊科寻求初级医疗护理?对获得全科医疗服务的人种志探索。
BMJ Open. 2017 May 4;7(4):e013816. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013816.
10
Emergency Department Referral Process and Subsequent Use of Safety-Net Clinics.急诊科转诊流程及安全网诊所的后续使用情况。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2015 Oct;17(5):1298-304. doi: 10.1007/s10903-014-0111-y.