Suppr超能文献

“门户假说”“共同责任模型”和/或“给药途径模型”能否预测青少年开始使用大麻?一项生存分析——TRAILS 研究。

Can the gateway hypothesis, the common liability model and/or, the route of administration model predict initiation of cannabis use during adolescence? A survival analysis--the TRAILS study.

机构信息

Research Institute of Child Development and Education, Department of Education, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Adolesc Health. 2011 Jan;48(1):73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.05.008. Epub 2010 Aug 30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

There is substantial research linking tobacco and alcohol use to subsequent cannabis use, yet the specificity of this relationship is still under debate. The aim of this study was to examine which substance use model--the gateway hypothesis, the common liability (CL) model and/or the route of administration model--best explains the relationship between early onset of tobacco and alcohol use and subsequent cannabis use initiation.

METHODS

We used data from 2,113 (51% female) Dutch adolescents who participated in three consecutive assessment waves (mean age: 11.09, 13.56, and 16.27 years, respectively) of the TRacking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey study. (Pre)adolescent cannabis, tobacco and alcohol use was assessed using the Youth Self-Report and a TRacking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey developed questionnaire.

RESULTS

We found that, during adolescence, early onset of tobacco use does not pose a significantly higher risk of initiating cannabis use than early onset alcohol use. Therefore, we can rule out the route of administration model. Moreover, we found that adolescents who reported early onset comorbid use of both tobacco and alcohol have a higher likelihood to initiate cannabis use than adolescents who have tried either tobacco or alcohol. The gateway hypothesis is not broad enough to explain this finding. Therefore, the CL model best predicts our findings.

CONCLUSION

Future research on adolescent cannabis initiation should focus on testing the robustness of the CL model. Furthermore, identifying adolescents who use both tobacco and alcohol, before the age of 13, may help to curtail the onset of cannabis use.

摘要

目的

有大量研究表明,烟草和酒精的使用与随后的大麻使用有关,但这种关系的特异性仍存在争议。本研究旨在检验哪种物质使用模型——门户假说、共同易感性(CL)模型和/或给药途径模型——最能解释早期吸烟和饮酒与随后大麻使用开始之间的关系。

方法

我们使用了来自 2113 名(51%为女性)荷兰青少年的数据,他们参加了跟踪青少年个体生活调查研究的三个连续评估阶段(平均年龄分别为 11.09 岁、13.56 岁和 16.27 岁)。(前)青春期大麻、烟草和酒精使用情况使用青少年自我报告和一个跟踪青少年个体生活调查开发的问卷进行评估。

结果

我们发现,在青少年时期,早期开始吸烟并不会比早期开始饮酒更显著地增加开始使用大麻的风险。因此,我们可以排除给药途径模型。此外,我们发现,报告同时早期开始使用烟草和酒精的青少年比仅尝试过烟草或酒精的青少年更有可能开始使用大麻。门户假说不足以解释这一发现。因此,CL 模型最能预测我们的研究结果。

结论

未来关于青少年大麻使用开始的研究应侧重于检验 CL 模型的稳健性。此外,在 13 岁之前识别同时使用烟草和酒精的青少年可能有助于遏制大麻使用的开始。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验