• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项前瞻性、随机、EORTC 多组间 3 期研究比较了选择性保留肾单位手术和根治性肾切除术治疗低分期肾细胞癌的肿瘤学结局。

A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2011 Apr;59(4):543-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.013. Epub 2010 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.013
PMID:21186077
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) can safely be performed with slightly higher complication rates than radical nephrectomy (RN), but proof of oncologic effectiveness is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To compare overall survival (OS) and time to progression.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From March 1992 to January 2003, when the study was prematurely closed because of poor accrual, 541 patients with small (≤5 cm), solitary, T1-T2 N0 M0 (Union Internationale Contre le Cancer [UICC] 1978) tumours suspicious for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and a normal contralateral kidney were randomised to NSS or RN in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genito-Urinary Group (EORTC-GU) noninferiority phase 3 trial 30904.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomised to NSS (n=268) or RN (n=273) together with limited lymph node dissection (LND).

MEASUREMENTS

Time to event end points was compared with log-rank test results.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Median follow-up was 9.3 yr. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis showed 10-yr OS rates of 81.1% for RN and 75.7% for NSS. With a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.50 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-2.16), the test for noninferiority is not significant (p=0.77), and test for superiority is significant (p=0.03). In RCC patients and clinically and pathologically eligible patients, the difference is less pronounced (HR=1.43 and HR=1.34, respectively), and the superiority test is no longer significant (p=0.07 and p=0.17, respectively). Only 12 of 117 deaths were the result of renal cancer (four RN and eight NSS). Twenty-one patients progressed (9 after RN and 12 after NSS). Quality of life and renal function outcomes have not been addressed.

CONCLUSIONS

Both methods provide excellent oncologic results. In the ITT population, NSS seems to be significantly less effective than RN in terms of OS. However, in the targeted population of RCC patients, the trend in favour of RN is no longer significant. The small number of progressions and deaths from renal cancer cannot explain any possible OS differences between treatment types.

摘要

背景

与根治性肾切除术(RN)相比,保肾手术(NSS)的并发症发生率略高,但缺乏肿瘤有效性的证据。

目的

比较总生存(OS)和无进展时间。

设计、设置和参与者:从 1992 年 3 月至 2003 年 1 月,当研究因入组人数不足而提前关闭时,欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)生殖泌尿系统组(EORTC-GU)非劣效性 30904 三期临床试验中,541 名患有小(≤5cm)、单发、T1-T2 N0 M0(国际抗癌联盟[UICC]1978)疑似肾细胞癌(RCC)且对侧肾脏正常的患者被随机分配至 NSS 或 RN。

干预

患者被随机分配至 NSS(n=268)或 RN(n=273),并进行有限的淋巴结清扫(LND)。

测量

使用对数秩检验比较时间事件终点。

结果和局限性

中位随访时间为 9.3 年。意向治疗(ITT)分析显示,RN 的 10 年 OS 率为 81.1%,NSS 为 75.7%。非劣效性检验的风险比(HR)为 1.50(95%置信区间[CI],1.03-2.16),检验结果不显著(p=0.77),优势检验结果显著(p=0.03)。在 RCC 患者和临床及病理上符合条件的患者中,差异不明显(HR=1.43 和 HR=1.34),优势检验不再显著(p=0.07 和 p=0.17)。117 例死亡中仅有 12 例(4 例 RN 和 8 例 NSS)为肾癌所致。21 例患者出现进展(9 例 RN,12 例 NSS)。未解决生活质量和肾功能结局问题。

结论

两种方法均提供了出色的肿瘤学结果。在 ITT 人群中,NSS 的 OS 效果明显不如 RN。然而,在 RCC 患者的目标人群中,RN 治疗的优势不再显著。肾癌进展和死亡的数量较少,无法解释两种治疗方法之间可能存在的 OS 差异。

相似文献

1
A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma.一项前瞻性、随机、EORTC 多组间 3 期研究比较了选择性保留肾单位手术和根治性肾切除术治疗低分期肾细胞癌的肿瘤学结局。
Eur Urol. 2011 Apr;59(4):543-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.013. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
2
A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the complications of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma.一项前瞻性随机的欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)组间3期研究,比较选择性保留肾单位手术和根治性肾切除术治疗低分期肾细胞癌的并发症。
Eur Urol. 2007 Jun;51(6):1606-15. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.013. Epub 2006 Nov 15.
3
Renal function after nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy: results from EORTC randomized trial 30904.保肾手术与根治性肾切除术对肾功能的影响:EORTC 随机试验 30904 的结果。
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):372-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.044. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
4
Elective nephron sparing surgery should become standard treatment for small unilateral renal cell carcinoma: Long-term survival data of 216 patients.选择性保留肾单位手术应成为小的单侧肾细胞癌的标准治疗方法:216例患者的长期生存数据。
Eur Urol. 2006 Feb;49(2):308-13. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.10.020. Epub 2005 Dec 9.
5
Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy.对于4至7厘米之间适当选择的肾细胞癌,保留肾单位手术的结果与根治性肾切除术相似。
J Urol. 2004 Mar;171(3):1066-70. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000113274.40885.db.
6
Oncological efficacy and safety of nephron-sparing surgery for selected patients with locally advanced renal cell carcinoma.保留肾单位手术治疗部分局部晚期肾细胞癌患者的肿瘤学疗效与安全性
BJU Int. 2007 Dec;100(6):1235-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07225.x.
7
Nephron-sparing surgery is equally effective to radical nephrectomy for T1BN0M0 renal cell carcinoma: a population-based assessment.保肾手术与根治性肾切除术治疗 T1BN0M0 期肾细胞癌同样有效:基于人群的评估。
Urology. 2010 Feb;75(2):271-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.04.098. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
8
Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy vs nephron-sparing surgery in patients with unilateral renal cell carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney.单侧肾细胞癌且对侧肾脏正常患者行根治性肾切除术与保留肾单位手术的配对比较。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2000 Dec;75(12):1236-42. doi: 10.4065/75.12.1236.
9
Bilateral synchronous sporadic renal cell carcinoma: surgical management, oncological and functional outcomes.双侧同步散发性肾细胞癌:手术治疗、肿瘤学及功能预后
BJU Int. 2007 Jul;100(1):26-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06899.x.
10
Long-term outcome of multiple ipsilateral renal tumours found at the time of planned nephron-sparing surgery.计划性保留肾单位手术时发现的多发同侧肾肿瘤的长期预后。
BJU Int. 2008 Jun;101(11):1375-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07588.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical Strategies in Renal Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Partial vs. Radical Nephrectomy Outcomes Across Tumor Stages.肾癌的手术策略:一项关于不同肿瘤分期下部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术结果的荟萃分析
Qatar Med J. 2025 Jun 9;2025(2):54. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2025.54. eCollection 2025.
2
Development and validation of a CT prediction model for precise stratification of renal cystic tumors: a multicenter retrospective study based on the BOSNIAK classification.基于博斯尼亚克分类的肾囊性肿瘤精确分层CT预测模型的开发与验证:一项多中心回顾性研究
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun 20. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11720-z.
3
Perioperative, Functional, and Oncological Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy in 1,267 Indian Patients: A Multicenter Analysis by the Indian Robotic Partial Nephrectomy (IRPN) Collaborative Group.
1267例印度患者机器人辅助部分肾切除术的围手术期、功能及肿瘤学结局:印度机器人部分肾切除术(IRPN)协作组的多中心分析
Cureus. 2025 May 16;17(5):e84209. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84209. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Surgical Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma in Transplanted Kidneys-A Narrative Review.移植肾肾细胞癌的外科治疗——一项叙述性综述
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 31;17(11):1864. doi: 10.3390/cancers17111864.
5
Nephron preservation in the management of renal cell carcinoma.肾细胞癌治疗中的肾单位保留
Singapore Med J. 2025 Jun 1;66(6):291-293. doi: 10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2025-109. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
6
Prediction of Glomerular Filtration Rate Following Partial Nephrectomy for Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma with Different Machine Learning Techniques.不同机器学习技术对局限性肾细胞癌行部分肾切除术后肾小球滤过率的预测
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 13;17(10):1647. doi: 10.3390/cancers17101647.
7
Partial versus radical nephrectomy for T1b renal cell carcinoma: A comparison of efficacy and prognostic factors based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.T1b期肾细胞癌行部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术的比较:基于监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库的疗效及预后因素分析
Curr Urol. 2024 Dec;18(4):328-335. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000229. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
8
The impact of ischemic reperfusion injury on contralateral kidneys and the determinants of renal prognosis after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.缺血再灌注损伤对健侧肾脏的影响及机器人辅助部分肾切除术后肾脏预后的决定因素。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 15;20(4):e0321769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321769. eCollection 2025.
9
Comparing the long-term prognosis and renal function changes of partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) in T1 stage renal cell carcinoma patients.比较T1期肾细胞癌患者行部分肾切除术(PN)和根治性肾切除术(RN)的长期预后及肾功能变化。
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Mar 30;14(3):740-750. doi: 10.21037/tau-2025-136. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
10
Role of artificial intelligence in predicting the renal function after nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.人工智能在预测肾细胞癌肾切除术后肾功能中的作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Apr 1. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04467-5.