Kinsella Christopher R, Cray James J, Cooper Gregory M, Pollack Ian F, Losee Joseph E
Divisions of Pediatric Plastic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Craniofac Surg. 2011 Jan;22(1):66-7. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181f6c488.
Suture reformation after strip craniectomy for nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis remains an inconsistent and underreported phenomenon. Although several theories have been proposed to account for the fate of the cranial defect, no explanation accurately matches clinical experience with the appearance of reformed sutures, ectopic sutures, and complete defect ossification postoperatively.
We review the case of a 7-year-old boy who formed a parasagittal suture at the defect margin after strip craniectomy for nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis. We review the literature and the clinical experiences of previous authors.
The pathogenesis of suture reformation and the biomechanical forces shaping suture formation are still poorly understood. Previous reports of postoperative suture reformation offer inconclusive evidence as to whether a pathologic suture, an abnormal cranial base, or a combination of biomechanical forces plays the larger role. It remains an open question as to whether a single underlying mechanism can explain suture reformation or if there are instead multiple causes.
对于非综合征性矢状缝早闭,在颅骨条带切除术后缝线重塑仍然是一种不一致且报道不足的现象。尽管已经提出了几种理论来解释颅骨缺损的转归,但没有一种解释能准确地将临床经验与术后重塑缝线、异位缝线及完全缺损骨化的表现相匹配。
我们回顾了一名7岁男孩的病例,该男孩在因非综合征性矢状缝早闭行颅骨条带切除术后,在缺损边缘形成了一条矢状旁缝线。我们回顾了文献及既往作者的临床经验。
缝线重塑的发病机制以及形成缝线的生物力学力量仍未被充分理解。既往关于术后缝线重塑的报道对于病理性缝线、异常颅底或生物力学力量的组合何者起更大作用提供了不确定的证据。单一潜在机制能否解释缝线重塑,还是存在多种原因,这仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。