• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肱二头肌肌腱切断术与肌腱固定术后等速肌力、耐力和主观结果的比较:一项术后研究。

Isokinetic strength, endurance, and subjective outcomes after biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a postoperative study.

机构信息

Bassett Shoulder and Sports Medicine Research Institute, Division of Orthopaedics, Bassett Healthcare Network, Cooperstown, New York, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2011 Apr;39(4):857-65. doi: 10.1177/0363546510387512. Epub 2010 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1177/0363546510387512
PMID:21189355
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Similar subjective outcomes have been reported for tenotomy or tenodesis of the long head of the biceps. Few studies have reported on postoperative strength and endurance.

HYPOTHESIS

Biceps tenodesis results in superior subjective outcomes, strength, and endurance compared with tenotomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Participants completed isokinetic strength and endurance testing for elbow flexion and supination on the operative and nonoperative sides a minimum of 2 years after biceps tenotomy or tenodesis. Modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (MASES) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores were obtained. The operative/nonoperative strength and endurance scores were compared for the tenotomy and tenodesis groups, with the nonoperative shoulder serving as the control for each participant's operative shoulder. Change scores for strength and endurance were reported as percentage increase or decrease as compared with the nonoperative side. Change scores and MASES and SANE scores were compared between the 2 groups. The presence of a "popeye" deformity or pain at the tenodesis site was noted.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients (19 tenotomy, 16 tenodesis) were studied. No significant difference was noted in postoperative MASES and SANE scores. Operative-side peak supination torque was significantly decreased relative to the nonoperative side in the tenotomy group, which had a significantly larger decrease in supination peak torque than did the tenodesis group on comparison of change scores. No significant difference was noted for peak flexion torque or flexion/supination endurance between operative and nonoperative sides in either group or between change scores for peak flexion torque or flexion/supination endurance in the tenotomy and tenodesis groups. Four tenotomy patients had a popeye deformity, 2 of whom reported painful cramping. Two patients had pain at the tenodesis site.

CONCLUSION

Subjective outcomes are similar for patients treated with tenotomy and tenodesis. Tenotomy decreases supination peak torque relative to the nonoperative side and tenodesis.

摘要

背景

对于肱二头肌长头肌腱切断术或肌腱固定术,已有类似的主观结果报道。很少有研究报告术后力量和耐力的情况。

假设

与肌腱切断术相比,肱二头肌肌腱固定术可获得更好的主观结果、力量和耐力。

研究设计

队列研究;证据水平,3 级。

方法

至少在肱二头肌肌腱切断术或肌腱固定术后 2 年,参与者对手术侧和非手术侧的肘部弯曲和旋前进行等速力量和耐力测试。获得改良美国肩肘外科医师(MASES)和单项评估数值评估(SANE)评分。比较肌腱切断术和肌腱固定术组的手术/非手术侧力量和耐力评分,每位参与者的手术肩以非手术肩为对照。将力量和耐力的变化评分报告为与非手术侧相比的增加或减少的百分比。比较两组间的变化评分以及 MASES 和 SANE 评分。注意肌腱固定术部位是否存在“蛤蟆眼”畸形或疼痛。

结果

共 35 例患者(19 例肌腱切断术,16 例肌腱固定术)参与研究。术后 MASES 和 SANE 评分无显著差异。与非手术侧相比,肌腱切断术组的手术侧旋后峰值扭矩显著降低,且与肌腱固定术组相比,变化评分的旋后峰值扭矩下降幅度更大。两组中,手术侧和非手术侧的峰值屈肌扭矩或屈肌/旋后耐力均无显著差异,肌腱切断术和肌腱固定术组的峰值屈肌扭矩或屈肌/旋后耐力的变化评分也无显著差异。4 例肌腱切断术患者出现“蛤蟆眼”畸形,其中 2 例报告疼痛性痉挛。2 例患者肌腱固定术部位疼痛。

结论

肌腱切断术和肌腱固定术治疗的患者主观结果相似。与非手术侧相比,肌腱切断术会降低旋后峰值扭矩,而肌腱固定术则不会。

相似文献

1
Isokinetic strength, endurance, and subjective outcomes after biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a postoperative study.肱二头肌肌腱切断术与肌腱固定术后等速肌力、耐力和主观结果的比较:一项术后研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Apr;39(4):857-65. doi: 10.1177/0363546510387512. Epub 2010 Dec 28.
2
Clinical and isokinetic comparison between tenotomy and tenodesis in biceps pathologies.二头肌病变中肌腱切断术与肌腱固定术的临床及等速肌力比较
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2011;45(1):41-6. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2011.2308.
3
Long head biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a cadaveric biomechanical analysis.肱二头肌长头腱切断术与腱固定术:一项尸体生物力学分析
Arthroscopy. 2005 Feb;21(2):182-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.10.014.
4
Patient-related factors and complications after arthroscopic tenotomy of the long head of the biceps tendon.关节镜下肱二头肌长头肌腱切断术后与患者相关的因素和并发症。
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Apr;39(4):783-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546510388158. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
5
Tenotomy or tenodesis for pathology of the long head of the biceps brachii: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肱二头肌长头病变的肌腱切断术或肌腱固定术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Dec;24(12):3765-3771. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3640-6. Epub 2015 May 15.
6
Tenotomy versus tenodesis in the management of pathologic lesions of the tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii.肱二头肌长头肌腱病理性病变治疗中肌腱切断术与肌腱固定术的比较
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Apr;37(4):828-33. doi: 10.1177/0363546508322179. Epub 2008 Sep 1.
7
Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a review of clinical outcomes and biomechanical results.肱二头肌切断术与肌腱固定术:临床疗效和生物力学结果的综述。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Mar;20(2):326-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.019. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
8
Tenotomy versus tenodesis in the treatment of the long head of biceps brachii tendon lesions.经肌腱切断术与肌腱固定术治疗肱二头肌长头肌腱病变。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Oct 22;13:205. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-205.
9
A comparison of forearm supination and elbow flexion strength in patients with long head of the biceps tenotomy or tenodesis.对比肱二头肌长头腱切断或固定术患者的前臂旋后和肘屈肌力。
Arthroscopy. 2011 Jan;27(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.06.022. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
10
Patient acceptance of long head of biceps brachii tenotomy.患者对肱二头肌长头肌腱切断术的接受程度。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Jan;21(1):61-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.01.014. Epub 2011 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Arthroscopic intra-articular vs. subpectoral biceps tenodesis with concomitant rotator cuff repair leads to equivocal MCID achievement.关节镜下关节内与胸小肌下肱二头肌固定术联合肩袖修复术在达到最小临床重要差异方面结果不明确。
JSES Int. 2025 Feb 14;9(3):728-734. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.01.020. eCollection 2025 May.
2
The impact of biceps tenotomy/tenodesis on Popeye sign incidence and functional outcome.肱二头肌肌腱切断术/肌腱固定术对大力水手征发生率及功能结局的影响。
JSES Int. 2024 Nov 23;9(2):373-379. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.10.015. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
The Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Tenotomy versus Tenodesis with Medium-to-Massive Rotator Cuff Tear in the Elderly: A Retrospective Study.
关节镜下肌腱切断术与肌腱固定术治疗老年中重度肩袖撕裂的临床疗效:一项回顾性研究
Clin Interv Aging. 2025 Jan 9;20:33-42. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S493029. eCollection 2025.
4
Clinical Outcome of an All Arthroscopic 'Whole Layer' Rotator Cuff Repair Technique with Simultaneous Biceps Tenodesis.关节镜下全层 "整体层" 修复技术同期肱二头肌肌腱固定术治疗肩袖撕裂的临床疗效。
Orthop Surg. 2024 Nov;16(11):2751-2760. doi: 10.1111/os.14198. Epub 2024 Aug 25.
5
Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using press-fit bony plug: a case series study.关节镜下肱二头肌肌腱固定术采用压配式骨塞:病例系列研究。
Int Orthop. 2024 Mar;48(3):785-792. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-06021-3. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
6
Biomechanical Analysis of Lark-Loop, Lasso-Loop and Krackow Suture Technique in Tenodesis.十钉固定术中鸽嘴样、套索样和 Krackow 缝合技术的生物力学分析
Orthop Surg. 2023 Apr;15(4):1136-1143. doi: 10.1111/os.13669. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
7
Clinical Outcomes of Long Head Biceps Tendinitis Treatment by a Semitenodesis Technique.采用半腱肌固定技术治疗肱二头肌长头肌腱炎的临床疗效
Cureus. 2022 Nov 12;14(11):e31430. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31430. eCollection 2022 Nov.
8
Is biceps tenodesis necessary when performing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients older than 55 years?对于 55 岁以上的患者,行关节镜肩袖修复时是否需要进行肱二头肌长头肌腱切断术?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):4267-4275. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04707-8. Epub 2022 Nov 27.
9
Rotator cuff repair with or without proximal end detachment for long head of the biceps tendon tenodesis.用于肱二头肌肌腱固定术的带或不带近端附着点分离的肩袖修复术。
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2022 Jun;25(2):101-105. doi: 10.5397/cise.2021.00493. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
10
Mini-Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Using a Suture Anchor with Bone-Bridge Backup.使用带骨桥支撑的缝合锚钉进行小切口胸小肌下肱二头肌肌腱固定术
Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Nov 2;10(12):e2639-e2644. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2021.08.006. eCollection 2021 Dec.